Taft Keele, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh, Mohammad Reza Movahed
{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术相比,心肌梗死和全因死亡率更低。","authors":"Taft Keele, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh, Mohammad Reza Movahed","doi":"10.2217/fca-2023-0102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> We compared inpatient outcome data of open (OC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). <b>Patients & methods:</b> We used the National Inpatient Samples database from 2010-2014. <b>Results:</b> LC was done in 340,999 and OC in 68,529 OC patients. In 2010, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) prevalence was 0.2 versus 0% (OR: 3.1, CI: 1.7-5.5; p < 0.001), non-STEMI 1 versus 0.4% (OR: 2.5 CI: 2.0-3.0; p < 0001), mortality 3.4 versus 0.4% (OR: 9.2, CI: 7.9-10.6; p < 0001). After multivariate adjustment, OC remained independently associated with STEMI, non-STEMI and all-cause inpatient mortality (mortality multivariate OR: 6.4, CI: 5.5-7.4; p < 0001, STEMI OR: 2.2. CI: 1.2-3.9; p = 0.007, non-STEMI OR: 1.5, CI: 1.3-1.9; p < 0001). <b>Conclusion:</b> OC is independently associated with STEMI, non-STEMI and all-cause inpatient mortality compared with LC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12589,"journal":{"name":"Future cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"759-765"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality with laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with open cholecystectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Taft Keele, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh, Mohammad Reza Movahed\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/fca-2023-0102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> We compared inpatient outcome data of open (OC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). <b>Patients & methods:</b> We used the National Inpatient Samples database from 2010-2014. <b>Results:</b> LC was done in 340,999 and OC in 68,529 OC patients. In 2010, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) prevalence was 0.2 versus 0% (OR: 3.1, CI: 1.7-5.5; p < 0.001), non-STEMI 1 versus 0.4% (OR: 2.5 CI: 2.0-3.0; p < 0001), mortality 3.4 versus 0.4% (OR: 9.2, CI: 7.9-10.6; p < 0001). After multivariate adjustment, OC remained independently associated with STEMI, non-STEMI and all-cause inpatient mortality (mortality multivariate OR: 6.4, CI: 5.5-7.4; p < 0001, STEMI OR: 2.2. CI: 1.2-3.9; p = 0.007, non-STEMI OR: 1.5, CI: 1.3-1.9; p < 0001). <b>Conclusion:</b> OC is independently associated with STEMI, non-STEMI and all-cause inpatient mortality compared with LC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"759-765\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/fca-2023-0102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/fca-2023-0102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lower myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality with laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with open cholecystectomy.
Aim: We compared inpatient outcome data of open (OC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Patients & methods: We used the National Inpatient Samples database from 2010-2014. Results: LC was done in 340,999 and OC in 68,529 OC patients. In 2010, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) prevalence was 0.2 versus 0% (OR: 3.1, CI: 1.7-5.5; p < 0.001), non-STEMI 1 versus 0.4% (OR: 2.5 CI: 2.0-3.0; p < 0001), mortality 3.4 versus 0.4% (OR: 9.2, CI: 7.9-10.6; p < 0001). After multivariate adjustment, OC remained independently associated with STEMI, non-STEMI and all-cause inpatient mortality (mortality multivariate OR: 6.4, CI: 5.5-7.4; p < 0001, STEMI OR: 2.2. CI: 1.2-3.9; p = 0.007, non-STEMI OR: 1.5, CI: 1.3-1.9; p < 0001). Conclusion: OC is independently associated with STEMI, non-STEMI and all-cause inpatient mortality compared with LC.
期刊介绍:
Research advances have contributed to improved outcomes across all specialties, but the rate of advancement in cardiology has been exceptional. Concurrently, the population of patients with cardiac conditions continues to grow and greater public awareness has increased patients" expectations of new drugs and devices. Future Cardiology (ISSN 1479-6678) reflects this new era of cardiology and highlights the new molecular approach to advancing cardiovascular therapy. Coverage will also reflect the major technological advances in bioengineering in cardiology in terms of advanced and robust devices, miniaturization, imaging, system modeling and information management issues.