利用 RUSLE 和 GIS 勘测不同土壤侵蚀等级下面积的十年变化:阿鲁纳恰尔邦西部和东部流域案例研究

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of the Geological Society of India Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI:10.1007/s12594-023-2528-1
M. Vese, P. Mishra, W. R. Singh, P. Lowang, S. Assumi, A. Bandyopadhyay, A. Bhadra
{"title":"利用 RUSLE 和 GIS 勘测不同土壤侵蚀等级下面积的十年变化:阿鲁纳恰尔邦西部和东部流域案例研究","authors":"M. Vese, P. Mishra, W. R. Singh, P. Lowang, S. Assumi, A. Bandyopadhyay, A. Bhadra","doi":"10.1007/s12594-023-2528-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study provides a comparative evaluation of spatio-temporal distribution of soil erosion in Western (Mago Basin) and Eastern (Dibang Basin) basins of Arunachal Pradesh, India as these two basins are vulnerably exposed to soil erosion due to its topographical characteristics of mountainous steep slope and experiences heavy rainfall. The study was carried out for a ten-years period (2003 to 2014) using RUSLE model which encompasses five important factors contributing to soil erosion. Rainfall erosivity (R factor) map was calculated using Climate Prediction Center gridded precipitation. Soil map and soil samples were used to analyze soil erodibility (K factor) map. Slope length and slope steepness (LS factor) maps were computed from SRTM DEM (30 m resolution). MODIS NDVI images were used to obtain cover management (C factor) map. Landuse Landcover map was used to obtained support practice (P factor) map. Higher value in rainfall erosivity and cover management factor was observed in Mago basin which contributed to higher average annual soil loss of 17.423 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup> in Mago basin and 5.461 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup> in Dibang basin, whereas the other three factor values were almost the same. The spatial maps showed 56.65% of Mago basin area and 76.27% of Dibang basin area was under the class of slight erosion, with the remaining areas of moderate to severe erosion risk for both the basins. Temporal average soil erosion in Mago basin varied within moderate to very high erosion classes whereas Dibang basin erosion classes varied from slight to moderate. The temporal trend line showed that the overall soil erosion was increasing at an alarming rate for Mago basin whereas a slight increase in Dibang basin was observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50001,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Geological Society of India","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decadal Variations in Area under Different Soil Erosion Classes using RUSLE and GIS: Case Studies of River Basins from Western and Eastern Arunachal Pradesh\",\"authors\":\"M. Vese, P. Mishra, W. R. Singh, P. Lowang, S. Assumi, A. Bandyopadhyay, A. Bhadra\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12594-023-2528-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study provides a comparative evaluation of spatio-temporal distribution of soil erosion in Western (Mago Basin) and Eastern (Dibang Basin) basins of Arunachal Pradesh, India as these two basins are vulnerably exposed to soil erosion due to its topographical characteristics of mountainous steep slope and experiences heavy rainfall. The study was carried out for a ten-years period (2003 to 2014) using RUSLE model which encompasses five important factors contributing to soil erosion. Rainfall erosivity (R factor) map was calculated using Climate Prediction Center gridded precipitation. Soil map and soil samples were used to analyze soil erodibility (K factor) map. Slope length and slope steepness (LS factor) maps were computed from SRTM DEM (30 m resolution). MODIS NDVI images were used to obtain cover management (C factor) map. Landuse Landcover map was used to obtained support practice (P factor) map. Higher value in rainfall erosivity and cover management factor was observed in Mago basin which contributed to higher average annual soil loss of 17.423 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup> in Mago basin and 5.461 t ha<sup>−1</sup> y<sup>−1</sup> in Dibang basin, whereas the other three factor values were almost the same. The spatial maps showed 56.65% of Mago basin area and 76.27% of Dibang basin area was under the class of slight erosion, with the remaining areas of moderate to severe erosion risk for both the basins. Temporal average soil erosion in Mago basin varied within moderate to very high erosion classes whereas Dibang basin erosion classes varied from slight to moderate. The temporal trend line showed that the overall soil erosion was increasing at an alarming rate for Mago basin whereas a slight increase in Dibang basin was observed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Geological Society of India\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Geological Society of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-023-2528-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Geological Society of India","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-023-2528-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对印度阿鲁纳恰尔邦西部盆地(马戈盆地)和东部盆地(迪邦盆地)的土壤侵蚀时空分布情况进行了比较评估,因为这两个盆地具有山地陡坡和降雨量大的地形特点,很容易受到土壤侵蚀的影响。研究采用 RUSLE 模型进行,为期十年(2003 年至 2014 年),该模型包含导致土壤侵蚀的五个重要因素。降雨侵蚀率(R因子)图是利用气候预测中心的网格降水量计算得出的。土壤地图和土壤样本用于分析土壤侵蚀率(K 系数)图。根据 SRTM DEM(30 米分辨率)计算出斜坡长度和斜坡陡度(LS 因子)图。利用 MODIS NDVI 图像获得覆盖管理(C 因子)地图。利用土地利用土地覆盖图获得支持实践(P 因子)图。马戈盆地的降雨侵蚀率和植被管理因子值较高,导致年平均土壤流失量较高,马戈盆地为 17.423 吨/公顷-年-1,迪邦盆地为 5.461 吨/公顷-年-1,而其他三个因子值几乎相同。空间分布图显示,马戈盆地 56.65% 的面积和迪邦盆地 76.27% 的面积处于轻度侵蚀等级,其余地区均处于中度至重度侵蚀风险等级。马戈盆地的时间平均土壤侵蚀程度在中度到极重度侵蚀等级之间变化,而迪邦盆地的侵蚀等级则从轻微到中度不等。时间趋势线显示,马戈盆地的总体土壤侵蚀正在以惊人的速度加剧,而迪邦盆地则略有加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decadal Variations in Area under Different Soil Erosion Classes using RUSLE and GIS: Case Studies of River Basins from Western and Eastern Arunachal Pradesh

This study provides a comparative evaluation of spatio-temporal distribution of soil erosion in Western (Mago Basin) and Eastern (Dibang Basin) basins of Arunachal Pradesh, India as these two basins are vulnerably exposed to soil erosion due to its topographical characteristics of mountainous steep slope and experiences heavy rainfall. The study was carried out for a ten-years period (2003 to 2014) using RUSLE model which encompasses five important factors contributing to soil erosion. Rainfall erosivity (R factor) map was calculated using Climate Prediction Center gridded precipitation. Soil map and soil samples were used to analyze soil erodibility (K factor) map. Slope length and slope steepness (LS factor) maps were computed from SRTM DEM (30 m resolution). MODIS NDVI images were used to obtain cover management (C factor) map. Landuse Landcover map was used to obtained support practice (P factor) map. Higher value in rainfall erosivity and cover management factor was observed in Mago basin which contributed to higher average annual soil loss of 17.423 t ha−1 y−1 in Mago basin and 5.461 t ha−1 y−1 in Dibang basin, whereas the other three factor values were almost the same. The spatial maps showed 56.65% of Mago basin area and 76.27% of Dibang basin area was under the class of slight erosion, with the remaining areas of moderate to severe erosion risk for both the basins. Temporal average soil erosion in Mago basin varied within moderate to very high erosion classes whereas Dibang basin erosion classes varied from slight to moderate. The temporal trend line showed that the overall soil erosion was increasing at an alarming rate for Mago basin whereas a slight increase in Dibang basin was observed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Geological Society of India
Journal of the Geological Society of India 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
233
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal aims to promote the cause of advanced study and research in all branches of geology connected with India, and to disseminate the findings of geological research in India through the publication.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Spatio-temporal Variability of a Flood Using the Hydrological Process of Flood Frequency in Ghagra River Basin, India Nature of the Two Episodes of Paleoproterozoic Magmatism (2495 Ma and 2190 Ma) in the Trans-North China Orogen, North China, with Implications for the Tectonic Evolution Semi-automated Rock Layer Recognition from Borehole Log Data Using Combined Wavelet and Fourier Transform: A Case Study in the KG basin, India Origin and Tectonic Implications of I-type Granites, North Delhi Fold Belt, NW, India: Insights from Whole Rock Geochemistry and Mineral Compositions Numerical Analysis of a Tunnel Passing through Jointed Rockmass
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1