Ph+ ALL的低强度和无化疗治疗:基于间接比较的无进展生存期。

IF 1.1 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Hematology Reports Pub Date : 2023-11-26 DOI:10.3390/hematolrep15040068
Melania Rivano, Daniele Mengato, Marco Chiumente, Andrea Messori
{"title":"Ph+ ALL的低强度和无化疗治疗:基于间接比较的无进展生存期。","authors":"Melania Rivano, Daniele Mengato, Marco Chiumente, Andrea Messori","doi":"10.3390/hematolrep15040068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Philadelphia chromosome-positive B-cell (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (LLA), growing evidence has accumulated regarding the efficacy of low-intensity and chemo-free regimens. Our objective was to analyze all recent trials evaluating these treatments and to compare them in terms of efficacy. We applied the Shiny method, an artificial intelligence technique, to analyze Kaplan-Meier curves and reconstruct patient-level data. Reconstructed patient data were then evaluated through standard survival statistics and subjected to indirect head-to-head treatment comparisons. The endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Based on 432 reconstructed patients, eight trials were analyzed. The survival data from these trials were pooled into three types of treatments: (i) treatments based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with reduced-intensity chemotherapy (denoted as TKICHE); (ii) TKIs associated with steroids with no chemotherapy (TKISTE); (iii) chemotherapy-free combinations of blinatumomab plus TKIs (TKIBLI). According to the Shiny method, the three PFS curves were reported in a single Kaplan-Meier graph and subjected to survival statistics. In terms of PFS, TKIBLI ranked first, TKICHE second, and TKISTE third; the differences between these three regimens were statistically significant. This multi-treatment Kaplan-Meier graph, generated through the Shiny method, summarized the current evidence on these treatments in both qualitative and quantitative terms.</p>","PeriodicalId":12829,"journal":{"name":"Hematology Reports","volume":"15 4","pages":"670-683"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10743216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-Intensity and Chemo-Free Treatments in Ph+ ALL: Progression-Free Survival Based on Indirect Comparisons.\",\"authors\":\"Melania Rivano, Daniele Mengato, Marco Chiumente, Andrea Messori\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/hematolrep15040068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Philadelphia chromosome-positive B-cell (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (LLA), growing evidence has accumulated regarding the efficacy of low-intensity and chemo-free regimens. Our objective was to analyze all recent trials evaluating these treatments and to compare them in terms of efficacy. We applied the Shiny method, an artificial intelligence technique, to analyze Kaplan-Meier curves and reconstruct patient-level data. Reconstructed patient data were then evaluated through standard survival statistics and subjected to indirect head-to-head treatment comparisons. The endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Based on 432 reconstructed patients, eight trials were analyzed. The survival data from these trials were pooled into three types of treatments: (i) treatments based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with reduced-intensity chemotherapy (denoted as TKICHE); (ii) TKIs associated with steroids with no chemotherapy (TKISTE); (iii) chemotherapy-free combinations of blinatumomab plus TKIs (TKIBLI). According to the Shiny method, the three PFS curves were reported in a single Kaplan-Meier graph and subjected to survival statistics. In terms of PFS, TKIBLI ranked first, TKICHE second, and TKISTE third; the differences between these three regimens were statistically significant. This multi-treatment Kaplan-Meier graph, generated through the Shiny method, summarized the current evidence on these treatments in both qualitative and quantitative terms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematology Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"670-683\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10743216/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/hematolrep15040068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/hematolrep15040068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在费城染色体阳性B细胞(Ph+)急性淋巴细胞白血病(LLA)中,越来越多的证据表明低强度和无化疗方案具有疗效。我们的目标是分析最近所有评估这些疗法的试验,并比较它们的疗效。我们采用人工智能技术 Shiny 方法分析 Kaplan-Meier 曲线,并重建患者层面的数据。重建后的患者数据通过标准生存统计进行评估,并进行间接的头对头治疗比较。终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。根据 432 位重建患者的数据,对 8 项试验进行了分析。这些试验的生存数据被汇总为三种治疗方法:(i)基于酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)联合降低化疗强度的治疗(简称TKICHE);(ii)TKIs与类固醇联合治疗,但不进行化疗(TKISTE);(iii)blinatumomab加TKIs的无化疗联合治疗(TKIBLI)。根据 "Shiny "方法,三条PFS曲线被报告在一张Kaplan-Meier图中,并进行生存统计。就PFS而言,TKIBLI排名第一,TKICHE排名第二,TKISTE排名第三;三种方案之间的差异具有统计学意义。通过 Shiny 方法生成的这种多疗法 Kaplan-Meier 图从定性和定量两个方面总结了这些疗法的现有证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Low-Intensity and Chemo-Free Treatments in Ph+ ALL: Progression-Free Survival Based on Indirect Comparisons.

In Philadelphia chromosome-positive B-cell (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (LLA), growing evidence has accumulated regarding the efficacy of low-intensity and chemo-free regimens. Our objective was to analyze all recent trials evaluating these treatments and to compare them in terms of efficacy. We applied the Shiny method, an artificial intelligence technique, to analyze Kaplan-Meier curves and reconstruct patient-level data. Reconstructed patient data were then evaluated through standard survival statistics and subjected to indirect head-to-head treatment comparisons. The endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Based on 432 reconstructed patients, eight trials were analyzed. The survival data from these trials were pooled into three types of treatments: (i) treatments based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with reduced-intensity chemotherapy (denoted as TKICHE); (ii) TKIs associated with steroids with no chemotherapy (TKISTE); (iii) chemotherapy-free combinations of blinatumomab plus TKIs (TKIBLI). According to the Shiny method, the three PFS curves were reported in a single Kaplan-Meier graph and subjected to survival statistics. In terms of PFS, TKIBLI ranked first, TKICHE second, and TKISTE third; the differences between these three regimens were statistically significant. This multi-treatment Kaplan-Meier graph, generated through the Shiny method, summarized the current evidence on these treatments in both qualitative and quantitative terms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hematology Reports
Hematology Reports HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Awareness and Attitude of the General Population Towards Inherited Hemoglobinopathies in the Premarital Screening Program in the Northern Region of Saudi Arabia. Solid Tumors, Liquid Challenges: The Impact of Coagulation Disorders. Bosutinib-Induced Pleural Effusion-Class Effect and Cross-Intolerance to All Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Risk Factors for Impaired Glucose Metabolism in Transfusion-Dependent Patients with β-Thalassemia: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study. The Role of Ferritin and Folate in Determining Stem Cell Collection for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Multiple Myeloma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1