Emily Newton-Hoe MPH, MPA , Alice Lee MD , Jennifer Fortin MPH , Alisa B. Goldberg MD, MPH , Elizabeth Janiak ScD , Sara Neill MD, MPH
{"title":"马萨诸塞州妇产科医生使用米非司酮的情况:使用的流行率和预测因素。","authors":"Emily Newton-Hoe MPH, MPA , Alice Lee MD , Jennifer Fortin MPH , Alisa B. Goldberg MD, MPH , Elizabeth Janiak ScD , Sara Neill MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We estimated the prevalence of mifepristone use for evidence-based indications among obstetrician-gynecologists in independent practice in Massachusetts and explored the demographic and practice-related factors associated with use.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We used data from a cross-sectional survey administered to Massachusetts obstetrician-gynecologists identified from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. We measured the prevalence of mifepristone use for four clinical scenarios: </span>early pregnancy<span> loss, medication abortion, cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation<span> procedures, and cervical preparation before induction of labor. Multivariate regression was used to calculate the odds of mifepristone use for these scenarios based on practice type, years in practice, physician sex, and history of medication abortion training.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 198 obstetrician-gynecologists responded to the survey (response rate = 29.0%); this analysis was limited to 158 respondents who were not in residency or fellowship. Overall, 46.0% used mifepristone for early pregnancy loss and 38.6% for medication abortion. Fewer used mifepristone for cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation (26.0%) or before induction of labor (26.4%). Respondents in academic practice settings, with more years in practice, of female sex, and with sufficient medication abortion training were significantly more likely to use mifepristone for one or more evidence-based clinical indications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Sufficient medication abortion training during residency significantly predicts whether obstetrician-gynecologists use mifepristone in practice. The U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of <em>Roe v. Wade</em><span> will allow state-level abortion bans and restrictions to be in effect, which will reduce exposure to abortion training during residency. Increasing training in and utilization of mifepristone are critical for equitable access to reproductive health services. Further interventions may need to be developed to increase mifepristone use in nonacademic practice settings.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mifepristone Use Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists in Massachusetts: Prevalence and Predictors of Use\",\"authors\":\"Emily Newton-Hoe MPH, MPA , Alice Lee MD , Jennifer Fortin MPH , Alisa B. Goldberg MD, MPH , Elizabeth Janiak ScD , Sara Neill MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.whi.2023.11.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We estimated the prevalence of mifepristone use for evidence-based indications among obstetrician-gynecologists in independent practice in Massachusetts and explored the demographic and practice-related factors associated with use.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We used data from a cross-sectional survey administered to Massachusetts obstetrician-gynecologists identified from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. We measured the prevalence of mifepristone use for four clinical scenarios: </span>early pregnancy<span> loss, medication abortion, cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation<span> procedures, and cervical preparation before induction of labor. Multivariate regression was used to calculate the odds of mifepristone use for these scenarios based on practice type, years in practice, physician sex, and history of medication abortion training.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 198 obstetrician-gynecologists responded to the survey (response rate = 29.0%); this analysis was limited to 158 respondents who were not in residency or fellowship. Overall, 46.0% used mifepristone for early pregnancy loss and 38.6% for medication abortion. Fewer used mifepristone for cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation (26.0%) or before induction of labor (26.4%). Respondents in academic practice settings, with more years in practice, of female sex, and with sufficient medication abortion training were significantly more likely to use mifepristone for one or more evidence-based clinical indications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Sufficient medication abortion training during residency significantly predicts whether obstetrician-gynecologists use mifepristone in practice. The U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of <em>Roe v. Wade</em><span> will allow state-level abortion bans and restrictions to be in effect, which will reduce exposure to abortion training during residency. Increasing training in and utilization of mifepristone are critical for equitable access to reproductive health services. Further interventions may need to be developed to increase mifepristone use in nonacademic practice settings.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723002086\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723002086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mifepristone Use Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists in Massachusetts: Prevalence and Predictors of Use
Objectives
We estimated the prevalence of mifepristone use for evidence-based indications among obstetrician-gynecologists in independent practice in Massachusetts and explored the demographic and practice-related factors associated with use.
Methods
We used data from a cross-sectional survey administered to Massachusetts obstetrician-gynecologists identified from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. We measured the prevalence of mifepristone use for four clinical scenarios: early pregnancy loss, medication abortion, cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation procedures, and cervical preparation before induction of labor. Multivariate regression was used to calculate the odds of mifepristone use for these scenarios based on practice type, years in practice, physician sex, and history of medication abortion training.
Results
A total of 198 obstetrician-gynecologists responded to the survey (response rate = 29.0%); this analysis was limited to 158 respondents who were not in residency or fellowship. Overall, 46.0% used mifepristone for early pregnancy loss and 38.6% for medication abortion. Fewer used mifepristone for cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation (26.0%) or before induction of labor (26.4%). Respondents in academic practice settings, with more years in practice, of female sex, and with sufficient medication abortion training were significantly more likely to use mifepristone for one or more evidence-based clinical indications.
Conclusions
Sufficient medication abortion training during residency significantly predicts whether obstetrician-gynecologists use mifepristone in practice. The U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade will allow state-level abortion bans and restrictions to be in effect, which will reduce exposure to abortion training during residency. Increasing training in and utilization of mifepristone are critical for equitable access to reproductive health services. Further interventions may need to be developed to increase mifepristone use in nonacademic practice settings.
期刊介绍:
Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.