马萨诸塞州妇产科医生使用米非司酮的情况:使用的流行率和预测因素。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Womens Health Issues Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2023.11.007
Emily Newton-Hoe MPH, MPA , Alice Lee MD , Jennifer Fortin MPH , Alisa B. Goldberg MD, MPH , Elizabeth Janiak ScD , Sara Neill MD, MPH
{"title":"马萨诸塞州妇产科医生使用米非司酮的情况:使用的流行率和预测因素。","authors":"Emily Newton-Hoe MPH, MPA ,&nbsp;Alice Lee MD ,&nbsp;Jennifer Fortin MPH ,&nbsp;Alisa B. Goldberg MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Janiak ScD ,&nbsp;Sara Neill MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2023.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We estimated the prevalence of mifepristone use for evidence-based indications among obstetrician-gynecologists in independent practice in Massachusetts and explored the demographic and practice-related factors associated with use.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We used data from a cross-sectional survey administered to Massachusetts obstetrician-gynecologists identified from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. We measured the prevalence of mifepristone use for four clinical scenarios: </span>early pregnancy<span> loss, medication abortion, cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation<span> procedures, and cervical preparation before induction of labor. Multivariate regression was used to calculate the odds of mifepristone use for these scenarios based on practice type, years in practice, physician sex, and history of medication abortion training.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 198 obstetrician-gynecologists responded to the survey (response rate = 29.0%); this analysis was limited to 158 respondents who were not in residency or fellowship. Overall, 46.0% used mifepristone for early pregnancy loss and 38.6% for medication abortion. Fewer used mifepristone for cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation (26.0%) or before induction of labor (26.4%). Respondents in academic practice settings, with more years in practice, of female sex, and with sufficient medication abortion training were significantly more likely to use mifepristone for one or more evidence-based clinical indications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Sufficient medication abortion training during residency significantly predicts whether obstetrician-gynecologists use mifepristone in practice. The U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of <em>Roe v. Wade</em><span> will allow state-level abortion bans and restrictions to be in effect, which will reduce exposure to abortion training during residency. Increasing training in and utilization of mifepristone are critical for equitable access to reproductive health services. Further interventions may need to be developed to increase mifepristone use in nonacademic practice settings.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mifepristone Use Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists in Massachusetts: Prevalence and Predictors of Use\",\"authors\":\"Emily Newton-Hoe MPH, MPA ,&nbsp;Alice Lee MD ,&nbsp;Jennifer Fortin MPH ,&nbsp;Alisa B. Goldberg MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Janiak ScD ,&nbsp;Sara Neill MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.whi.2023.11.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We estimated the prevalence of mifepristone use for evidence-based indications among obstetrician-gynecologists in independent practice in Massachusetts and explored the demographic and practice-related factors associated with use.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We used data from a cross-sectional survey administered to Massachusetts obstetrician-gynecologists identified from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. We measured the prevalence of mifepristone use for four clinical scenarios: </span>early pregnancy<span> loss, medication abortion, cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation<span> procedures, and cervical preparation before induction of labor. Multivariate regression was used to calculate the odds of mifepristone use for these scenarios based on practice type, years in practice, physician sex, and history of medication abortion training.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 198 obstetrician-gynecologists responded to the survey (response rate = 29.0%); this analysis was limited to 158 respondents who were not in residency or fellowship. Overall, 46.0% used mifepristone for early pregnancy loss and 38.6% for medication abortion. Fewer used mifepristone for cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation (26.0%) or before induction of labor (26.4%). Respondents in academic practice settings, with more years in practice, of female sex, and with sufficient medication abortion training were significantly more likely to use mifepristone for one or more evidence-based clinical indications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Sufficient medication abortion training during residency significantly predicts whether obstetrician-gynecologists use mifepristone in practice. The U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of <em>Roe v. Wade</em><span> will allow state-level abortion bans and restrictions to be in effect, which will reduce exposure to abortion training during residency. Increasing training in and utilization of mifepristone are critical for equitable access to reproductive health services. Further interventions may need to be developed to increase mifepristone use in nonacademic practice settings.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Health Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723002086\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386723002086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:我们估算了马萨诸塞州独立执业的妇产科医生根据循证适应症使用米非司酮的流行率,并探讨了与使用米非司酮相关的人口统计学和执业相关因素:我们使用了一项横断面调查的数据,调查对象为从美国医学协会医生主档案中识别出的马萨诸塞州妇产科医生。我们测量了米非司酮在四种临床情况下的使用率:早期妊娠流产、药物流产、扩张和排空手术前的宫颈准备以及引产前的宫颈准备。根据执业类型、执业年限、医生性别和药物流产培训史,采用多元回归法计算出这些情况下使用米非司酮的几率:共有 198 名妇产科医生对调查做出了回复(回复率=29.0%);本分析仅限于 158 名非住院医师或研究员的受访者。总体而言,46.0% 的人使用米非司酮治疗早期妊娠流产,38.6% 的人使用米非司酮治疗药物流产。使用米非司酮进行扩宫和排空前宫颈准备(26.0%)或引产前宫颈准备(26.4%)的受访者较少。在学术实践环境中、从业年限较长、性别为女性、接受过充分的药物流产培训的受访者使用米非司酮用于一种或多种循证临床适应症的可能性明显更高:结论:在住院医生实习期间接受过充分的药物流产培训可显著预测妇产科医生是否在实践中使用米非司酮。美国最高法院推翻了 "罗伊诉韦德案",这将使州一级的堕胎禁令和限制生效,从而减少住院医师培训期间接受堕胎培训的机会。增加米非司酮的培训和使用对于公平获得生殖健康服务至关重要。可能需要制定进一步的干预措施,以增加米非司酮在非学术实践环境中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mifepristone Use Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists in Massachusetts: Prevalence and Predictors of Use

Objectives

We estimated the prevalence of mifepristone use for evidence-based indications among obstetrician-gynecologists in independent practice in Massachusetts and explored the demographic and practice-related factors associated with use.

Methods

We used data from a cross-sectional survey administered to Massachusetts obstetrician-gynecologists identified from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. We measured the prevalence of mifepristone use for four clinical scenarios: early pregnancy loss, medication abortion, cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation procedures, and cervical preparation before induction of labor. Multivariate regression was used to calculate the odds of mifepristone use for these scenarios based on practice type, years in practice, physician sex, and history of medication abortion training.

Results

A total of 198 obstetrician-gynecologists responded to the survey (response rate = 29.0%); this analysis was limited to 158 respondents who were not in residency or fellowship. Overall, 46.0% used mifepristone for early pregnancy loss and 38.6% for medication abortion. Fewer used mifepristone for cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation (26.0%) or before induction of labor (26.4%). Respondents in academic practice settings, with more years in practice, of female sex, and with sufficient medication abortion training were significantly more likely to use mifepristone for one or more evidence-based clinical indications.

Conclusions

Sufficient medication abortion training during residency significantly predicts whether obstetrician-gynecologists use mifepristone in practice. The U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade will allow state-level abortion bans and restrictions to be in effect, which will reduce exposure to abortion training during residency. Increasing training in and utilization of mifepristone are critical for equitable access to reproductive health services. Further interventions may need to be developed to increase mifepristone use in nonacademic practice settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
期刊最新文献
A Mixed Methods Longitudinal Investigation of Maternal Depression Across the Perinatal Period Among Mothers Who Gave Birth During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Exploring Consumer Preferences for Pharmacy Provision of Mifepristone in the Human-centered Design Discovery Phase. "Women's Lives Are on the Line, and Our Hands Are Tied": How Television Is Reckoning With a Post-Dobbs America. Women's Health Care Delivery and Coordination After Transitioning From One Electronic Health Record to Another: Perspectives From Staff in the Veterans Health Administration. Protective Factors Associated With Lower Likelihood of Injection Drug Use and Experiencing Overdose Among Incarcerated Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1