{"title":"赤足行走对持续性足跟痛患者有益:单盲随机对照试验","authors":"Miriam Reinstein , Asaf Weisman , Youssef Masharawi","doi":"10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A lack of data exist about the effectiveness of active treatments for persistent plantar heel pain (PPHP).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare short-term functional and clinical effects of a 4-week barefoot or shod treadmill walking program for people with PPHP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-blinded clinical trial randomized 52 participants with PPHP into either a barefoot walking group (BWG), or a shod walking group (SWG). All participants received therapeutic ultrasound. Outcomes were measured at baseline (t<sub>0</sub>), following 4 weeks of treatment (t<sub>1</sub>), and at 1-month follow-up (t<sub>2</sub>). The SF-36 functional questionnaire score was the main outcome. Secondary outcomes were self-reported and clinically-assessed pain provocation levels, pressure pain thresholds and pain tolerance. Treadmill walking time and speed were measured at t<sub>0</sub> and t<sub>1</sub>; people also recorded the time spent walking each day in a diary.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The BWG exhibited significant improvements in all SF-36 items (except “emotional well-being”) (<em>P</em> < 0.05), whereas the SWG exhibited improvements only in “pain” and “health change” items (<em>P</em> = 0.0001; effect size 0.13–0.94). Greater improvements were observed in the BWG than the SWG for “physical function” (<em>P</em> = 0.019) and “role limitations due to physical health” items (<em>P</em> = 0.035). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain, with greater improvements in the BWG (<em>P</em> = 0.0001; effect size 0.89). Only the BWG showed significant improvements in pain pressure thresholds (<em>P</em> < 0.05; effect size 0.70) and pain tolerance (<em>P</em> < 0.001; effect size 0.67). Both groups significantly increased their speed and time spent walking on the treadmill (BWG Δ=19.7 min and Δ=1.7 km/h; SWG Δ=16.7 min and Δ=1.1 km/h) and time outdoors (SWG ∆=38.2 min/week; BWG mean ∆=48.5 min/week) (<em>P</em> < 0.001). All clinical tests of pain were significantly less positive in the BWG at all time points (<em>P</em> < 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both walking programs benefited people with PPHP by alleviating pain and improving function and quality of life. Greater improvements were observed in the BWG than the SWG overall.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"67 2","pages":"Article 101786"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barefoot walking is beneficial for individuals with persistent plantar heel pain: A single-blind randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Miriam Reinstein , Asaf Weisman , Youssef Masharawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A lack of data exist about the effectiveness of active treatments for persistent plantar heel pain (PPHP).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare short-term functional and clinical effects of a 4-week barefoot or shod treadmill walking program for people with PPHP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-blinded clinical trial randomized 52 participants with PPHP into either a barefoot walking group (BWG), or a shod walking group (SWG). All participants received therapeutic ultrasound. Outcomes were measured at baseline (t<sub>0</sub>), following 4 weeks of treatment (t<sub>1</sub>), and at 1-month follow-up (t<sub>2</sub>). The SF-36 functional questionnaire score was the main outcome. Secondary outcomes were self-reported and clinically-assessed pain provocation levels, pressure pain thresholds and pain tolerance. Treadmill walking time and speed were measured at t<sub>0</sub> and t<sub>1</sub>; people also recorded the time spent walking each day in a diary.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The BWG exhibited significant improvements in all SF-36 items (except “emotional well-being”) (<em>P</em> < 0.05), whereas the SWG exhibited improvements only in “pain” and “health change” items (<em>P</em> = 0.0001; effect size 0.13–0.94). Greater improvements were observed in the BWG than the SWG for “physical function” (<em>P</em> = 0.019) and “role limitations due to physical health” items (<em>P</em> = 0.035). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain, with greater improvements in the BWG (<em>P</em> = 0.0001; effect size 0.89). Only the BWG showed significant improvements in pain pressure thresholds (<em>P</em> < 0.05; effect size 0.70) and pain tolerance (<em>P</em> < 0.001; effect size 0.67). Both groups significantly increased their speed and time spent walking on the treadmill (BWG Δ=19.7 min and Δ=1.7 km/h; SWG Δ=16.7 min and Δ=1.1 km/h) and time outdoors (SWG ∆=38.2 min/week; BWG mean ∆=48.5 min/week) (<em>P</em> < 0.001). All clinical tests of pain were significantly less positive in the BWG at all time points (<em>P</em> < 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both walking programs benefited people with PPHP by alleviating pain and improving function and quality of life. Greater improvements were observed in the BWG than the SWG overall.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"volume\":\"67 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101786\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187706572300057X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187706572300057X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Barefoot walking is beneficial for individuals with persistent plantar heel pain: A single-blind randomized controlled trial
Background
A lack of data exist about the effectiveness of active treatments for persistent plantar heel pain (PPHP).
Objectives
To compare short-term functional and clinical effects of a 4-week barefoot or shod treadmill walking program for people with PPHP.
Methods
A single-blinded clinical trial randomized 52 participants with PPHP into either a barefoot walking group (BWG), or a shod walking group (SWG). All participants received therapeutic ultrasound. Outcomes were measured at baseline (t0), following 4 weeks of treatment (t1), and at 1-month follow-up (t2). The SF-36 functional questionnaire score was the main outcome. Secondary outcomes were self-reported and clinically-assessed pain provocation levels, pressure pain thresholds and pain tolerance. Treadmill walking time and speed were measured at t0 and t1; people also recorded the time spent walking each day in a diary.
Results
The BWG exhibited significant improvements in all SF-36 items (except “emotional well-being”) (P < 0.05), whereas the SWG exhibited improvements only in “pain” and “health change” items (P = 0.0001; effect size 0.13–0.94). Greater improvements were observed in the BWG than the SWG for “physical function” (P = 0.019) and “role limitations due to physical health” items (P = 0.035). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain, with greater improvements in the BWG (P = 0.0001; effect size 0.89). Only the BWG showed significant improvements in pain pressure thresholds (P < 0.05; effect size 0.70) and pain tolerance (P < 0.001; effect size 0.67). Both groups significantly increased their speed and time spent walking on the treadmill (BWG Δ=19.7 min and Δ=1.7 km/h; SWG Δ=16.7 min and Δ=1.1 km/h) and time outdoors (SWG ∆=38.2 min/week; BWG mean ∆=48.5 min/week) (P < 0.001). All clinical tests of pain were significantly less positive in the BWG at all time points (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
Both walking programs benefited people with PPHP by alleviating pain and improving function and quality of life. Greater improvements were observed in the BWG than the SWG overall.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine covers all areas of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine; such as: methods of evaluation of motor, sensory, cognitive and visceral impairments; acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain; disabilities in adult and children ; processes of rehabilitation in orthopaedic, rhumatological, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary and urological diseases.