对家中有私人供水的人的健康和生活方式的调查。

J R Meara
{"title":"对家中有私人供水的人的健康和生活方式的调查。","authors":"J R Meara","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People living in 102 rural households on private water supplies, and their matched controls on mains water, were asked about their health in a postal questionnaire. People using private water supplies were more likely to be from farming families (and so in socioeconomic class II) and less likely to be retired than their controls on mains water. Families using contaminated private supplies ('dirty' water) reported lower rates of colds and respiratory illnesses than people using mains water or uncontaminated private supplies ('clean' water). The mains-water users had visited their general practitioners more often in the last three months. There was no difference in the incidence of acute abdominal symptoms recorded in a diary kept by survey participants. Considering children, who are more susceptible to infectious illnesses, the only difference in health was that children in the families with 'dirty' private water took more medication (though reported illness less often) than others. In conclusion, the study indicated that private water is not harmful to health, but the results must be put in the context of evidence from other work.</p>","PeriodicalId":75726,"journal":{"name":"Community medicine","volume":"11 2","pages":"131-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042457","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation of health and lifestyle in people who have private water supplies at home.\",\"authors\":\"J R Meara\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>People living in 102 rural households on private water supplies, and their matched controls on mains water, were asked about their health in a postal questionnaire. People using private water supplies were more likely to be from farming families (and so in socioeconomic class II) and less likely to be retired than their controls on mains water. Families using contaminated private supplies ('dirty' water) reported lower rates of colds and respiratory illnesses than people using mains water or uncontaminated private supplies ('clean' water). The mains-water users had visited their general practitioners more often in the last three months. There was no difference in the incidence of acute abdominal symptoms recorded in a diary kept by survey participants. Considering children, who are more susceptible to infectious illnesses, the only difference in health was that children in the families with 'dirty' private water took more medication (though reported illness less often) than others. In conclusion, the study indicated that private water is not harmful to health, but the results must be put in the context of evidence from other work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"131-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042457\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

102个农村家庭的居民使用私人供水,并对他们的自来水进行了相应的控制,调查人员通过邮寄问卷询问了他们的健康状况。使用私人供水的人更有可能来自农业家庭(因此属于社会经济第二阶层),与使用自来水的人相比,退休的可能性更小。使用受污染的私人供水(“脏”水)的家庭报告感冒和呼吸道疾病的发病率低于使用自来水或未受污染的私人供水(“干净”水)的家庭。在过去三个月里,自来水用户更频繁地去看他们的全科医生。调查参与者在日记中记录的急性腹部症状的发生率没有差异。考虑到更容易感染传染病的儿童,健康方面的唯一区别是,私人用水“脏”的家庭的儿童比其他家庭的儿童服用了更多的药物(尽管报告患病的情况较少)。总之,该研究表明,私人用水对健康无害,但必须将结果放在其他工作证据的背景下考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An investigation of health and lifestyle in people who have private water supplies at home.

People living in 102 rural households on private water supplies, and their matched controls on mains water, were asked about their health in a postal questionnaire. People using private water supplies were more likely to be from farming families (and so in socioeconomic class II) and less likely to be retired than their controls on mains water. Families using contaminated private supplies ('dirty' water) reported lower rates of colds and respiratory illnesses than people using mains water or uncontaminated private supplies ('clean' water). The mains-water users had visited their general practitioners more often in the last three months. There was no difference in the incidence of acute abdominal symptoms recorded in a diary kept by survey participants. Considering children, who are more susceptible to infectious illnesses, the only difference in health was that children in the families with 'dirty' private water took more medication (though reported illness less often) than others. In conclusion, the study indicated that private water is not harmful to health, but the results must be put in the context of evidence from other work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of diagnosis-related groups in the National Health Service. Economic analysis in the evaluation of health promotion. A report of the investigation and control measures instituted after the isolation of toxin-producing Corynebacterium diphtheriae mitis from a child in Leeds. Communicable disease report. April to June 1989. The PHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre. Women's knowledge and experience of cervical screening: a failure of health education and medical organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1