基于异速关系的生物量因子兼容估算方法:中国西南部云南省松类天然林案例研究

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forests Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI:10.3390/f15010026
Wenfang Li, Hui Xu, Yong Wu, Xiaoli Zhang, Chunxiao Liu, Chi Lu, Zhibo Yu, Guanglong Ou
{"title":"基于异速关系的生物量因子兼容估算方法:中国西南部云南省松类天然林案例研究","authors":"Wenfang Li, Hui Xu, Yong Wu, Xiaoli Zhang, Chunxiao Liu, Chi Lu, Zhibo Yu, Guanglong Ou","doi":"10.3390/f15010026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using various biomass factors, such as biomass expansion factor (BEF) and biomass conversion and expansion factor (BCEF), yields different results for estimating forest biomass. Therefore, ensuring compatibility between total biomass and its components when employing different biomass factors is crucial for developing a set of rapid and efficient models for large-scale biomass calculation. In this study, allometric equations were utilized to construct independent models and the proportional values (root-to-shoot ratio (Rra), crown-to-stem ratio (Rcs), bark-to-wood ratio (Rbw), foliage-to-bark ratio (Rfb), and wood biomass-to-wood volume (ρ)) by using the mean height (Hm) and the mean diameter at breast height (Dg) of 98 Pinus densata plots in Shangri-La, Yunnan province, China. The compatible methods were applied to reveal the compatibility between the total biomass and each component’s biomass. The results showed the following: (1) Both the independent model and compatible model had a higher accuracy. The values were greater than 0.7 overall, but the foliage biomass accuracy was only 0.2. The total biomass and the component biomass showed compatibility. (2) The accuracy of BEF and BCEF exceeded 0.87 and the total error was less than 0.1 for most components. (3) The mean BEF (1.6) was greater than that of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (M = 1.3), and the mean BCEF was smaller than that of the IPCC; the values were 0.6 and 0.7, respectively. The range of BEF (1.4–2.1) and BCEF (0.44–0.89) were all within the range of the IPCC (1.15–3.2, 0.4–1.0). This study provides a more convenient and accurate method for calculating conversion coefficients (BEF and BCEF), especially when only Rcs data is available.","PeriodicalId":12339,"journal":{"name":"Forests","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Compatible Estimation Method for Biomass Factors Based on Allometric Relationship: A Case Study on Pinus densata Natural Forest in Yunnan Province of Southwest China\",\"authors\":\"Wenfang Li, Hui Xu, Yong Wu, Xiaoli Zhang, Chunxiao Liu, Chi Lu, Zhibo Yu, Guanglong Ou\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/f15010026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using various biomass factors, such as biomass expansion factor (BEF) and biomass conversion and expansion factor (BCEF), yields different results for estimating forest biomass. Therefore, ensuring compatibility between total biomass and its components when employing different biomass factors is crucial for developing a set of rapid and efficient models for large-scale biomass calculation. In this study, allometric equations were utilized to construct independent models and the proportional values (root-to-shoot ratio (Rra), crown-to-stem ratio (Rcs), bark-to-wood ratio (Rbw), foliage-to-bark ratio (Rfb), and wood biomass-to-wood volume (ρ)) by using the mean height (Hm) and the mean diameter at breast height (Dg) of 98 Pinus densata plots in Shangri-La, Yunnan province, China. The compatible methods were applied to reveal the compatibility between the total biomass and each component’s biomass. The results showed the following: (1) Both the independent model and compatible model had a higher accuracy. The values were greater than 0.7 overall, but the foliage biomass accuracy was only 0.2. The total biomass and the component biomass showed compatibility. (2) The accuracy of BEF and BCEF exceeded 0.87 and the total error was less than 0.1 for most components. (3) The mean BEF (1.6) was greater than that of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (M = 1.3), and the mean BCEF was smaller than that of the IPCC; the values were 0.6 and 0.7, respectively. The range of BEF (1.4–2.1) and BCEF (0.44–0.89) were all within the range of the IPCC (1.15–3.2, 0.4–1.0). This study provides a more convenient and accurate method for calculating conversion coefficients (BEF and BCEF), especially when only Rcs data is available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forests\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forests\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/f15010026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forests","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/f15010026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用不同的生物量因子,如生物量扩展因子(BEF)和生物量转换与扩展因子(BCEF),会产生不同的森林生物量估算结果。因此,在使用不同的生物量因子时,确保总生物量及其组成部分之间的兼容性,对于开发一套快速、高效的大规模生物量计算模型至关重要。在本研究中,利用异速方程构建了独立模型,并利用中国云南省香格里拉市 98 个松树地块的平均高度(Hm)和平均胸径(Dg)计算了比例值(根与芽比(Rra)、冠与茎比(Rcs)、树皮与木材比(Rbw)、叶与树皮比(Rfb)和木材生物量与木材体积比(ρ))。应用相容性方法揭示了总生物量与各组分生物量之间的相容性。结果表明(1)独立模型和兼容模型的准确度都较高。总体数值大于 0.7,但叶片生物量的精确度仅为 0.2。总生物量和组分生物量显示出兼容性。(2) BEF 和 BCEF 的精度超过 0.87,大部分成分的总误差小于 0.1。(3) BEF 的平均值(1.6)大于政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)的平均值(M = 1.3),BCEF 的平均值小于 IPCC 的平均值,分别为 0.6 和 0.7。BEF(1.4-2.1)和 BCEF(0.44-0.89)的范围均在 IPCC(1.15-3.2,0.4-1.0)的范围之内。这项研究为计算转换系数(BEF 和 BCEF)提供了一种更方便、更准确的方法,尤其是在只有 Rcs 数据的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Compatible Estimation Method for Biomass Factors Based on Allometric Relationship: A Case Study on Pinus densata Natural Forest in Yunnan Province of Southwest China
Using various biomass factors, such as biomass expansion factor (BEF) and biomass conversion and expansion factor (BCEF), yields different results for estimating forest biomass. Therefore, ensuring compatibility between total biomass and its components when employing different biomass factors is crucial for developing a set of rapid and efficient models for large-scale biomass calculation. In this study, allometric equations were utilized to construct independent models and the proportional values (root-to-shoot ratio (Rra), crown-to-stem ratio (Rcs), bark-to-wood ratio (Rbw), foliage-to-bark ratio (Rfb), and wood biomass-to-wood volume (ρ)) by using the mean height (Hm) and the mean diameter at breast height (Dg) of 98 Pinus densata plots in Shangri-La, Yunnan province, China. The compatible methods were applied to reveal the compatibility between the total biomass and each component’s biomass. The results showed the following: (1) Both the independent model and compatible model had a higher accuracy. The values were greater than 0.7 overall, but the foliage biomass accuracy was only 0.2. The total biomass and the component biomass showed compatibility. (2) The accuracy of BEF and BCEF exceeded 0.87 and the total error was less than 0.1 for most components. (3) The mean BEF (1.6) was greater than that of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (M = 1.3), and the mean BCEF was smaller than that of the IPCC; the values were 0.6 and 0.7, respectively. The range of BEF (1.4–2.1) and BCEF (0.44–0.89) were all within the range of the IPCC (1.15–3.2, 0.4–1.0). This study provides a more convenient and accurate method for calculating conversion coefficients (BEF and BCEF), especially when only Rcs data is available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forests
Forests FORESTRY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.20%
发文量
1823
审稿时长
19.02 days
期刊介绍: Forests (ISSN 1999-4907) is an international and cross-disciplinary scholarly journal of forestry and forest ecology. It publishes research papers, short communications and review papers. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Patterns in Forest Soil CO2 Flux in a Pacific Northwest Temperate Rainforest Assessment of Climate Change and Land Use/Land Cover Effects on Aralia elata Habitat Suitability in Northeastern China Determination of the Static Bending Properties of Green Beech and Oak Wood by the Frequency Resonance Technique Variations in Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Kalidium foliatum Leaves and Roots in Two Saline Habitats in Desert Region Wildfires’ Effect on Soil Properties and Bacterial Biodiversity of Postpyrogenic Histic Podzols (Middle Taiga, Komi Republic)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1