基于可塑性而非局部遗传适应性的 Polistes 黄蜂个体面部学习的地域差异

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioral Ecology Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI:10.1093/beheco/arad100
Meagan Simons, Delbert A Green, E. Tibbetts
{"title":"基于可塑性而非局部遗传适应性的 Polistes 黄蜂个体面部学习的地域差异","authors":"Meagan Simons, Delbert A Green, E. Tibbetts","doi":"10.1093/beheco/arad100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Signals and receiver responses often vary across a species’ geographic range. Effective communication requires a match between signal and receiver response, so there is much interest in the developmental mechanisms that maintain this link. Two potential mechanisms are genetic covariance between signal and receiver response and plasticity where individuals adjust their phenotype based on their partner’s phenotype. Here, we test how plasticity contributes to geographic variation in individual face recognition in Polistes fuscatus wasps. Previous work has shown that P. fuscatus from Michigan, USA (MI) have variable facial patterns used for individual recognition, while P. fuscatus from central Pennsylvania, USA (PA) lack variable facial patterns and are unable to learn individual conspecifics. We experimentally altered rearing environment, so wasps were either reared with their own population or in a common garden with wasps from both populations. Then, we tested the wasps’ capacity to learn and remember individual conspecific faces. Consistent with previous work, MI wasps reared with MI wasps were adept at learning conspecific faces, while PA wasps reared with PA wasps were unable to learn conspecific faces. However, MI and PA wasps reared in a common garden developed similar, intermediate capacity for individual face learning. These results indicate that individual face learning in Polistes wasps is highly plastic and responsive to the social environment. Plasticity in receiver responses may be a common mechanism mediating geographic differences in non-sexual signaling systems and may play a role in maintaining links between signals and receiver responses in geographically variable communication systems.","PeriodicalId":8840,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology","volume":"77 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographic variation in individual face learning based on plasticity rather than local genetic adaptation in Polistes wasps\",\"authors\":\"Meagan Simons, Delbert A Green, E. Tibbetts\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/beheco/arad100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Signals and receiver responses often vary across a species’ geographic range. Effective communication requires a match between signal and receiver response, so there is much interest in the developmental mechanisms that maintain this link. Two potential mechanisms are genetic covariance between signal and receiver response and plasticity where individuals adjust their phenotype based on their partner’s phenotype. Here, we test how plasticity contributes to geographic variation in individual face recognition in Polistes fuscatus wasps. Previous work has shown that P. fuscatus from Michigan, USA (MI) have variable facial patterns used for individual recognition, while P. fuscatus from central Pennsylvania, USA (PA) lack variable facial patterns and are unable to learn individual conspecifics. We experimentally altered rearing environment, so wasps were either reared with their own population or in a common garden with wasps from both populations. Then, we tested the wasps’ capacity to learn and remember individual conspecific faces. Consistent with previous work, MI wasps reared with MI wasps were adept at learning conspecific faces, while PA wasps reared with PA wasps were unable to learn conspecific faces. However, MI and PA wasps reared in a common garden developed similar, intermediate capacity for individual face learning. These results indicate that individual face learning in Polistes wasps is highly plastic and responsive to the social environment. Plasticity in receiver responses may be a common mechanism mediating geographic differences in non-sexual signaling systems and may play a role in maintaining links between signals and receiver responses in geographically variable communication systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Ecology\",\"volume\":\"77 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arad100\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arad100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

信号和接收器的反应在一个物种的地理范围内往往各不相同。有效的交流需要信号和接收者的反应相匹配,因此维持这种联系的发育机制备受关注。两种潜在的机制是信号和接收反应之间的遗传协方差和可塑性(个体根据其伙伴的表型调整自己的表型)。在这里,我们测试了可塑性如何导致 Polistes fuscatus 黄蜂个体人脸识别的地理变异。先前的研究表明,来自美国密歇根州(MI)的P. fuscatus具有用于个体识别的可变面部模式,而来自美国宾夕法尼亚州中部(PA)的P. fuscatus则缺乏可变面部模式,无法学习同种个体。我们通过实验改变了饲养环境,使黄蜂要么与自己的种群一起饲养,要么与来自两个种群的黄蜂一起在一个共同的花园中饲养。然后,我们测试了黄蜂学习和记忆单个同种面孔的能力。与之前的研究结果一致,与MI小蜂一起饲养的MI小蜂善于学习同种人脸,而与PA小蜂一起饲养的PA小蜂则无法学习同种人脸。然而,在一个共同花园中饲养的MI和PA小蜂发展出了类似的、中等水平的个体面孔学习能力。这些结果表明,Polistes黄蜂的个体面孔学习具有高度可塑性,并能对社会环境做出反应。接收者反应的可塑性可能是介导非性信号系统地理差异的共同机制,并可能在维持地理可变通讯系统中信号与接收者反应之间的联系方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geographic variation in individual face learning based on plasticity rather than local genetic adaptation in Polistes wasps
Signals and receiver responses often vary across a species’ geographic range. Effective communication requires a match between signal and receiver response, so there is much interest in the developmental mechanisms that maintain this link. Two potential mechanisms are genetic covariance between signal and receiver response and plasticity where individuals adjust their phenotype based on their partner’s phenotype. Here, we test how plasticity contributes to geographic variation in individual face recognition in Polistes fuscatus wasps. Previous work has shown that P. fuscatus from Michigan, USA (MI) have variable facial patterns used for individual recognition, while P. fuscatus from central Pennsylvania, USA (PA) lack variable facial patterns and are unable to learn individual conspecifics. We experimentally altered rearing environment, so wasps were either reared with their own population or in a common garden with wasps from both populations. Then, we tested the wasps’ capacity to learn and remember individual conspecific faces. Consistent with previous work, MI wasps reared with MI wasps were adept at learning conspecific faces, while PA wasps reared with PA wasps were unable to learn conspecific faces. However, MI and PA wasps reared in a common garden developed similar, intermediate capacity for individual face learning. These results indicate that individual face learning in Polistes wasps is highly plastic and responsive to the social environment. Plasticity in receiver responses may be a common mechanism mediating geographic differences in non-sexual signaling systems and may play a role in maintaining links between signals and receiver responses in geographically variable communication systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Ecology
Behavioral Ecology 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Studies on the whole range of behaving organisms, including plants, invertebrates, vertebrates, and humans, are included. Behavioral Ecology construes the field in its broadest sense to include 1) the use of ecological and evolutionary processes to explain the occurrence and adaptive significance of behavior patterns; 2) the use of behavioral processes to predict ecological patterns, and 3) empirical, comparative analyses relating behavior to the environment in which it occurs.
期刊最新文献
Urban sensory conditions alter rival interactions and mate choice in urban and forest túngara frogs. Interaction between anthropogenic stressors affects antipredator defense in an intertidal crustacean. An immune challenge induces a decline in parental effort and compensation by the mate. Social and seasonal variation in dwarf mongoose home-range size, daily movements, and burrow use. Detectability of a poison frog and its Batesian mimic depends on body posture and viewing angle.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1