M. G. Eltarabily, Hany Abd-elhamid, Martina Zeleňáková, Mohamed Kamel Elshaarawy, Mohamed Elkiki, Tarek Selim
{"title":"利用机器学习模型预测衬砌灌渠的渗漏损失","authors":"M. G. Eltarabily, Hany Abd-elhamid, Martina Zeleňáková, Mohamed Kamel Elshaarawy, Mohamed Elkiki, Tarek Selim","doi":"10.3389/frwa.2023.1287357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efficient water resource management in irrigation systems relies on the accurate estimation of seepage loss from lined canals. This study utilized machine learning (ML) algorithms to tackle this challenge in seepage loss prediction.Firstly, seepage flow through irrigation canals was modeled numerically and experimentally using Slide2 and physical models, respectively. Then, the Slide2 model results were compared to the experimental tests. Thus, the model was used to conduct 600 simulation scenarios. A parametric analysis was performed to investigate the effect of canal geometry and liner properties on seepage loss. Based on the conducted scenarios, ML models were developed and evaluated to determine the best predictive model. The ML models included non-ensemble (regression-based, evolutionary, neural network) and ensemble models. Non-ensemble models (adaptive boosting, random forest, gradient boosting). There were four input ratios in these models: bed width to water depth, side slope, liner to soil hydraulic conductivity, and liner thickness to water depth. The output variable was the seepage loss ratio. Seven performance indices and k-fold cross-validation were employed to evaluate reliability and accuracy. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to investigate the significance of each input in predicting seepage loss.The findings revealed that the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model was the most dependable predictor, achieving the highest determination-coefficient (R2) value of 0.997 and root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of 0.201. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) followed the ANN model closely, which achieved an R2 of 0.996 and RMSE of 0.246. Sensitivity analysis showed that liner hydraulic conductivity is the most significant parameter, contributing 62% predictive importance, while the side slope has the lowest significance. In conclusion, this study presented efficient and cost-effective models for predicting seepage loss, eliminating the need for resource-intensive experimental or field investigations.","PeriodicalId":33801,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Water","volume":"54 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting seepage losses from lined irrigation canals using machine learning models\",\"authors\":\"M. G. Eltarabily, Hany Abd-elhamid, Martina Zeleňáková, Mohamed Kamel Elshaarawy, Mohamed Elkiki, Tarek Selim\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frwa.2023.1287357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Efficient water resource management in irrigation systems relies on the accurate estimation of seepage loss from lined canals. This study utilized machine learning (ML) algorithms to tackle this challenge in seepage loss prediction.Firstly, seepage flow through irrigation canals was modeled numerically and experimentally using Slide2 and physical models, respectively. Then, the Slide2 model results were compared to the experimental tests. Thus, the model was used to conduct 600 simulation scenarios. A parametric analysis was performed to investigate the effect of canal geometry and liner properties on seepage loss. Based on the conducted scenarios, ML models were developed and evaluated to determine the best predictive model. The ML models included non-ensemble (regression-based, evolutionary, neural network) and ensemble models. Non-ensemble models (adaptive boosting, random forest, gradient boosting). There were four input ratios in these models: bed width to water depth, side slope, liner to soil hydraulic conductivity, and liner thickness to water depth. The output variable was the seepage loss ratio. Seven performance indices and k-fold cross-validation were employed to evaluate reliability and accuracy. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to investigate the significance of each input in predicting seepage loss.The findings revealed that the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model was the most dependable predictor, achieving the highest determination-coefficient (R2) value of 0.997 and root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of 0.201. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) followed the ANN model closely, which achieved an R2 of 0.996 and RMSE of 0.246. Sensitivity analysis showed that liner hydraulic conductivity is the most significant parameter, contributing 62% predictive importance, while the side slope has the lowest significance. In conclusion, this study presented efficient and cost-effective models for predicting seepage loss, eliminating the need for resource-intensive experimental or field investigations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Water\",\"volume\":\"54 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2023.1287357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2023.1287357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
灌溉系统中有效的水资源管理有赖于对衬砌渠道渗漏损失的准确估算。本研究利用机器学习(ML)算法来解决渗流损失预测中的这一难题。首先,使用 Slide2 和物理模型分别对灌溉渠道中的渗流进行了数值建模和实验建模。然后,将 Slide2 模型结果与实验测试结果进行比较。因此,该模型被用于进行 600 个模拟场景。通过参数分析,研究了运河几何形状和衬垫特性对渗流损失的影响。根据模拟场景,开发并评估了 ML 模型,以确定最佳预测模型。ML 模型包括非集合模型(基于回归的模型、进化模型、神经网络模型)和集合模型。非集合模型(自适应提升、随机森林、梯度提升)。这些模型有四个输入比率:床宽与水深的比率、边坡、衬垫与土壤的导水率以及衬垫厚度与水深的比率。输出变量是渗流损失率。采用了七个性能指标和 k 倍交叉验证来评估可靠性和准确性。研究结果表明,人工神经网络(ANN)模型是最可靠的预测模型,其确定系数(R2)值为 0.997,均方根误差(RMSE)为 0.201。最高梯度提升(XGBoost)紧随 ANN 模型之后,R2 值为 0.996,均方根误差为 0.246。敏感性分析表明,衬垫水导率是最重要的参数,其预测重要性占 62%,而边坡的重要性最低。总之,本研究提出了高效且经济的渗流损失预测模型,无需进行资源密集型实验或实地调查。
Predicting seepage losses from lined irrigation canals using machine learning models
Efficient water resource management in irrigation systems relies on the accurate estimation of seepage loss from lined canals. This study utilized machine learning (ML) algorithms to tackle this challenge in seepage loss prediction.Firstly, seepage flow through irrigation canals was modeled numerically and experimentally using Slide2 and physical models, respectively. Then, the Slide2 model results were compared to the experimental tests. Thus, the model was used to conduct 600 simulation scenarios. A parametric analysis was performed to investigate the effect of canal geometry and liner properties on seepage loss. Based on the conducted scenarios, ML models were developed and evaluated to determine the best predictive model. The ML models included non-ensemble (regression-based, evolutionary, neural network) and ensemble models. Non-ensemble models (adaptive boosting, random forest, gradient boosting). There were four input ratios in these models: bed width to water depth, side slope, liner to soil hydraulic conductivity, and liner thickness to water depth. The output variable was the seepage loss ratio. Seven performance indices and k-fold cross-validation were employed to evaluate reliability and accuracy. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to investigate the significance of each input in predicting seepage loss.The findings revealed that the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model was the most dependable predictor, achieving the highest determination-coefficient (R2) value of 0.997 and root-mean-square-error (RMSE) of 0.201. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) followed the ANN model closely, which achieved an R2 of 0.996 and RMSE of 0.246. Sensitivity analysis showed that liner hydraulic conductivity is the most significant parameter, contributing 62% predictive importance, while the side slope has the lowest significance. In conclusion, this study presented efficient and cost-effective models for predicting seepage loss, eliminating the need for resource-intensive experimental or field investigations.