Zachary M Gertz, Raymond J. Strobel, Alex M. Wisniewski, Clifford E. Fonner, Alan Speir, N. Teman, Mohammed Quader
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣置换术时代主动脉瓣手术尺寸和选择的变化","authors":"Zachary M Gertz, Raymond J. Strobel, Alex M. Wisniewski, Clifford E. Fonner, Alan Speir, N. Teman, Mohammed Quader","doi":"10.1155/2023/5537595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. The adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has changed the profile of patients referred for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and drawn more attention to valve sizing and durability. We examined the influence of TAVR on SAVR practice. Methods. Using a statewide database, we evaluated all isolated SAVRs, categorized into three eras: pre-TAVR (2008 to 2011), early TAVR (2012 to 2015), and current-TAVR (2016 to 2022). The primary outcomes of interest were changes in prosthetic valve size and the percentage of mechanical valves used between time periods. Results. There were 6,445 patients included. SAVR volume declined in the current era. Valve size increased over time. In the pre-TAVR era, 41% of patients received a valve smaller than 23 mm, which declined to 33% in the early TAVR era, then to 22% in the current era (p < 0.001 for all). The year of surgery was significantly associated with larger valve selection even after controlling for patient characteristics. Annular enlargement rose in the current-TAVR era (p < 0.001). The use of mechanical valves rose in the current era (p < 0.001 compared to early TAVR). Regression analysis showed that the year of surgery was not predictive of mechanical valve use, suggesting that changes in practice were driven by patient characteristics. Conclusion. Surgical valve choice since the adoption of TAVR has changed, with less frequent use of smaller valves. Increases in mechanical valve usage are likely a reflection of changing patient population.","PeriodicalId":15367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing Surgical Aortic Valve Size and Choices in the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Era\",\"authors\":\"Zachary M Gertz, Raymond J. Strobel, Alex M. Wisniewski, Clifford E. Fonner, Alan Speir, N. Teman, Mohammed Quader\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/5537595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. The adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has changed the profile of patients referred for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and drawn more attention to valve sizing and durability. We examined the influence of TAVR on SAVR practice. Methods. Using a statewide database, we evaluated all isolated SAVRs, categorized into three eras: pre-TAVR (2008 to 2011), early TAVR (2012 to 2015), and current-TAVR (2016 to 2022). The primary outcomes of interest were changes in prosthetic valve size and the percentage of mechanical valves used between time periods. Results. There were 6,445 patients included. SAVR volume declined in the current era. Valve size increased over time. In the pre-TAVR era, 41% of patients received a valve smaller than 23 mm, which declined to 33% in the early TAVR era, then to 22% in the current era (p < 0.001 for all). The year of surgery was significantly associated with larger valve selection even after controlling for patient characteristics. Annular enlargement rose in the current-TAVR era (p < 0.001). The use of mechanical valves rose in the current era (p < 0.001 compared to early TAVR). Regression analysis showed that the year of surgery was not predictive of mechanical valve use, suggesting that changes in practice were driven by patient characteristics. Conclusion. Surgical valve choice since the adoption of TAVR has changed, with less frequent use of smaller valves. Increases in mechanical valve usage are likely a reflection of changing patient population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiac Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiac Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5537595\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5537595","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Changing Surgical Aortic Valve Size and Choices in the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Era
Objective. The adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has changed the profile of patients referred for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and drawn more attention to valve sizing and durability. We examined the influence of TAVR on SAVR practice. Methods. Using a statewide database, we evaluated all isolated SAVRs, categorized into three eras: pre-TAVR (2008 to 2011), early TAVR (2012 to 2015), and current-TAVR (2016 to 2022). The primary outcomes of interest were changes in prosthetic valve size and the percentage of mechanical valves used between time periods. Results. There were 6,445 patients included. SAVR volume declined in the current era. Valve size increased over time. In the pre-TAVR era, 41% of patients received a valve smaller than 23 mm, which declined to 33% in the early TAVR era, then to 22% in the current era (p < 0.001 for all). The year of surgery was significantly associated with larger valve selection even after controlling for patient characteristics. Annular enlargement rose in the current-TAVR era (p < 0.001). The use of mechanical valves rose in the current era (p < 0.001 compared to early TAVR). Regression analysis showed that the year of surgery was not predictive of mechanical valve use, suggesting that changes in practice were driven by patient characteristics. Conclusion. Surgical valve choice since the adoption of TAVR has changed, with less frequent use of smaller valves. Increases in mechanical valve usage are likely a reflection of changing patient population.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiac Surgery (JCS) is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to contemporary surgical treatment of cardiac disease. Renown for its detailed "how to" methods, JCS''s well-illustrated, concise technical articles, critical reviews and commentaries are highly valued by dedicated readers worldwide.
With Editor-in-Chief Harold Lazar, MD and an internationally prominent editorial board, JCS continues its 20-year history as an important professional resource. Editorial coverage includes biologic support, mechanical cardiac assist and/or replacement and surgical techniques, and features current material on topics such as OPCAB surgery, stented and stentless valves, endovascular stent placement, atrial fibrillation, transplantation, percutaneous valve repair/replacement, left ventricular restoration surgery, immunobiology, and bridges to transplant and recovery.
In addition, special sections (Images in Cardiac Surgery, Cardiac Regeneration) and historical reviews stimulate reader interest. The journal also routinely publishes proceedings of important international symposia in a timely manner.