首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Cardiac Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Single-Center Success of Concomitant Cryothermal Cox-Maze IV Procedure 单中心成功实施低温 Cox-Maze IV 程序
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI: 10.1155/2024/1136595
Benedikt Mayr, Anna Maria Kokott, Teodora Georgescu, Bernhard Voss, Markus Krane, Keti Vitanova

Background. Despite the guideline recommendation, implementation of the Cox-maze (CM) IV procedure has been variable and current data are limited. Methods. We reviewed patients with concomitant CM IV procedure (05/2019−05/2020). The primary endpoints of the study were the success rate of surgical ablation and continuity of sinus rhythm (SR) 1 year after surgery. Secondary endpoints included permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, postoperative mortality, and identification of predictors for postoperative SR. Results. The concomitant CM IV procedure was performed in 92 patients. Indications were persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in 40 patients (43.5%), paroxysmal AF in 36 (39.1%), and long-standing persistent AF in 16 (17.4%). At hospital discharge, SR was achieved in 49 patients (63.6%) and PPM implantation was necessary in 12 patients (13%). At 1 year after surgical ablation, SR was seen in 31 patients (59.6%) and PPM implantation was required in six further patients (6.5%). Patients with long-standing persistent AF were significantly less likely to achieve SR (odds ratio (OR): 0.18, p = 0.003), and postoperative mortality was significantly increased in this subgroup (hazard ratio (HR): 5.4, p = 0.02). In patients with enlarged left atrial (LA) diameter, the probability of achieving SR was significantly decreased (OR: 0.48, p = 0.045). Need for postoperative dialysis (HR: 12.9, p = 0.02) and prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (HR: 2.2, p = 0.01) were independently associated with increased mortality after CM IV. Conclusions. The cryothermal CM IV procedure has an overall 1-year success rate of 60% with increased rates of PPM implantation. Patients with long-standing persistent AF and increased LA diameter were significantly less likely to achieve SR.

背景。尽管有指南建议,Cox-maze(CM)IV 程序的实施情况却不尽相同,目前的数据也很有限。方法。我们回顾了同时进行CM IV手术的患者(2019年5月至2020年5月)。研究的主要终点是手术消融的成功率和术后一年窦性心律(SR)的持续性。次要终点包括永久起搏器(PPM)植入、术后死亡率以及术后窦性心律预测因素的鉴定。结果。92名患者同时进行了CM IV手术。40名患者(43.5%)的适应症为持续性房颤(AF),36名患者(39.1%)为阵发性房颤,16名患者(17.4%)为长期持续性房颤。出院时,49 名患者(63.6%)达到了 SR,12 名患者(13%)需要植入 PPM。手术消融 1 年后,31 名患者(59.6%)达到了 SR,另有 6 名患者(6.5%)需要植入 PPM。长期持续性房颤患者获得 SR 的几率明显较低(几率比 (OR):0.18,P = 0.003),而且该亚组患者的术后死亡率明显增加(危险比 (HR):5.4,P = 0.02)。在左心房(LA)直径增大的患者中,达到 SR 的概率明显降低(OR:0.48,p = 0.045)。术后需要透析(HR:12.9,p = 0.02)和在重症监护室住院时间延长(HR:2.2,p = 0.01)与 CM IV 后死亡率增加有独立关联。结论低温 CM IV 手术的 1 年总体成功率为 60%,PPM 植入率有所提高。长期持续房颤和 LA 直径增大的患者获得 SR 的可能性明显降低。
{"title":"Single-Center Success of Concomitant Cryothermal Cox-Maze IV Procedure","authors":"Benedikt Mayr,&nbsp;Anna Maria Kokott,&nbsp;Teodora Georgescu,&nbsp;Bernhard Voss,&nbsp;Markus Krane,&nbsp;Keti Vitanova","doi":"10.1155/2024/1136595","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1136595","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Background</i>. Despite the guideline recommendation, implementation of the Cox-maze (CM) IV procedure has been variable and current data are limited. <i>Methods</i>. We reviewed patients with concomitant CM IV procedure (05/2019−05/2020). The primary endpoints of the study were the success rate of surgical ablation and continuity of sinus rhythm (SR) 1 year after surgery. Secondary endpoints included permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, postoperative mortality, and identification of predictors for postoperative SR. <i>Results</i>. The concomitant CM IV procedure was performed in 92 patients. Indications were persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in 40 patients (43.5%), paroxysmal AF in 36 (39.1%), and long-standing persistent AF in 16 (17.4%). At hospital discharge, SR was achieved in 49 patients (63.6%) and PPM implantation was necessary in 12 patients (13%). At 1 year after surgical ablation, SR was seen in 31 patients (59.6%) and PPM implantation was required in six further patients (6.5%). Patients with long-standing persistent AF were significantly less likely to achieve SR (odds ratio (OR): 0.18, <i>p</i> = 0.003), and postoperative mortality was significantly increased in this subgroup (hazard ratio (HR): 5.4, <i>p</i> = 0.02). In patients with enlarged left atrial (LA) diameter, the probability of achieving SR was significantly decreased (OR: 0.48, <i>p</i> = 0.045). Need for postoperative dialysis (HR: 12.9, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (HR: 2.2, <i>p</i> = 0.01) were independently associated with increased mortality after CM IV. <i>Conclusions</i>. The cryothermal CM IV procedure has an overall 1-year success rate of 60% with increased rates of PPM implantation. Patients with long-standing persistent AF and increased LA diameter were significantly less likely to achieve SR.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1136595","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142152265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interrupted Aortic Arch: Assessment of Morphology and Associated Cardiovascular Anomalies on Computed Tomography Angiography 主动脉弓中断:计算机断层扫描血管造影术对形态学和相关心血管异常的评估
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1155/2024/5552627
Vidiyala Pujitha, Niraj Nirmal Pandey, Mansi Verma, Sanjeev Kumar, Sivasubramanian Ramakrishnan, Priya Jagia

Aim. The present study sought to evaluate the cardiovascular morphology and associated anomalies in patients with interrupted aortic arch (IAA) on CT angiography. Materials and Methods. A retrospective review of our departmental database was conducted to identify patients diagnosed with IAA on CT angiography between January 2014 and September 2022. The demographic information, anatomic characteristics, and associated cardiovascular abnormalities in patients with IAA were assessed. The morphological types of IAA were described in accordance with Celoria–Patton classification. Results. IAA was seen in 49 patients (32 males and 17 females; mean age: 15.9 months). The most common type of IAA based on the site of interruption was type A seen in 27/49 (55.1%) patients, while type B was observed in 22/49 (44.9%) patients. No patient of type C IAA was encountered in the current series. The most commonly associated cardiovascular anomaly was patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) seen in 45/49 (91.8%) patients. Atrial septal defect was seen in 15/49 (30.6%) patients, while 39/49 (79.6%) patients had a ventricular septal defect (VSD). Common arterial trunk was the most common abnormal ventriculo-arterial connection seen in 13/49 (26.5%) patients. Aorto-pulmonary window was associated with 7/49 (14.3%) patients. Conclusion. IAA is a rare congenital heart defect associated with an array of cardiovascular anomalies, most common being PDA and VSD. CT angiography is useful not only in diagnosing and characterizing the IAA but also in identifying associated anomalies which may have a bearing on the clinical presentation, prognosis, and surgical management.

研究目的本研究旨在通过 CT 血管造影评估主动脉弓中断(IAA)患者的心血管形态和相关异常。材料和方法。我们对科室数据库进行了回顾性审查,以确定在 2014 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月期间通过 CT 血管造影确诊为 IAA 的患者。评估IAA患者的人口统计学信息、解剖学特征和相关心血管异常。根据 Celoria-Patton 分类法描述了 IAA 的形态学类型。结果。49名患者(32名男性,17名女性;平均年龄:15.9个月)患有IAA。根据中断部位,最常见的 IAA 类型是 A 型,见于 27/49 例患者(55.1%),而 B 型见于 22/49 例患者(44.9%)。本系列中没有发现 C 型 IAA 患者。最常见的心血管异常是动脉导管未闭(PDA),见于 45/49 例(91.8%)患者。15/49(30.6%)例患者出现房间隔缺损,39/49(79.6%)例患者出现室间隔缺损(VSD)。动脉总干是最常见的异常心室-动脉连接,见于 13/49 (26.5%)例患者。7/49(14.3%)例患者伴有主动脉-肺窗。结论IAA是一种罕见的先天性心脏缺陷,伴有一系列心血管畸形,最常见的是PDA和VSD。CT 血管造影不仅有助于诊断 IAA 和确定其特征,还能发现与之相关的异常,这些异常可能会对临床表现、预后和手术治疗产生影响。
{"title":"Interrupted Aortic Arch: Assessment of Morphology and Associated Cardiovascular Anomalies on Computed Tomography Angiography","authors":"Vidiyala Pujitha,&nbsp;Niraj Nirmal Pandey,&nbsp;Mansi Verma,&nbsp;Sanjeev Kumar,&nbsp;Sivasubramanian Ramakrishnan,&nbsp;Priya Jagia","doi":"10.1155/2024/5552627","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5552627","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Aim</i>. The present study sought to evaluate the cardiovascular morphology and associated anomalies in patients with interrupted aortic arch (IAA) on CT angiography. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. A retrospective review of our departmental database was conducted to identify patients diagnosed with IAA on CT angiography between January 2014 and September 2022. The demographic information, anatomic characteristics, and associated cardiovascular abnormalities in patients with IAA were assessed. The morphological types of IAA were described in accordance with Celoria–Patton classification. <i>Results</i>. IAA was seen in 49 patients (32 males and 17 females; mean age: 15.9 months). The most common type of IAA based on the site of interruption was type A seen in 27/49 (55.1%) patients, while type B was observed in 22/49 (44.9%) patients. No patient of type C IAA was encountered in the current series. The most commonly associated cardiovascular anomaly was patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) seen in 45/49 (91.8%) patients. Atrial septal defect was seen in 15/49 (30.6%) patients, while 39/49 (79.6%) patients had a ventricular septal defect (VSD). Common arterial trunk was the most common abnormal ventriculo-arterial connection seen in 13/49 (26.5%) patients. Aorto-pulmonary window was associated with 7/49 (14.3%) patients. <i>Conclusion</i>. IAA is a rare congenital heart defect associated with an array of cardiovascular anomalies, most common being PDA and VSD. CT angiography is useful not only in diagnosing and characterizing the IAA but also in identifying associated anomalies which may have a bearing on the clinical presentation, prognosis, and surgical management.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5552627","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142152343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementation of Robotic Coronary Surgery after Established Mitral Robotic Program 在建立二尖瓣机器人项目后实施机器人冠状动脉手术
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.1155/2024/8822068
Valentina Grazioli, Matteo Pettinari, Davide Personeni, Ascanio Graniero, Laura Giroletti, Giovanni Albano, Matteo Parrinello, Claudio Roscitano, Gianluca Torregrossa, Alfonso Agnino

Aims. We described our advancement in the field of robotic cardiac surgery, particularly in the context of coronary revascularization. We will outline how the application of the Da Vinci® X Surgical System in coronary surgery is safe, feasible, and reproducible after an adequate familiarization with the docking system, that could come from a previous mitral valve robotic program, and after a sufficient learning time period. Methods. Between February 2021 and December 2023, a cohort of 33 patients underwent coronary artery revascularization surgery, involving robotic harvesting of the left mammary artery and off-pump hand-direct bypass to the left descending coronary artery or marginal coronary artery. In cases of hybrid revascularization, percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent placement was performed either before or after surgery. Results. There were no mortalities within 30 days and at 1 year of follow-up after surgery. Notably, 70% of patients were extubated in the operating room immediately following the surgical procedure. The median postoperative mechanical ventilation time was 0 [0–4] hours, and the median length of stay in the intensive care unit was 21 [20–48] hours. A progressive reduction of the console and instrumental Da Vinci® X Surgical System was underling after the 21st patient. Conclusion. The promising outcomes observed in this series highlight that robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass represents a well-established technique that could be reproducible, especially when integrated into a hybrid strategy. Initiating a program in robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery can be effectively attained in particularly when a well-established background in Da Vinci® X Surgical System utilization is achieved.

目的我们介绍了机器人心脏手术领域的进展,特别是在冠状动脉血运重建方面。我们将概述达芬奇® X 手术系统在冠状动脉手术中的应用是如何在充分熟悉对接系统(可能来自于之前的二尖瓣机器人手术项目)和经过足够的学习时间后变得安全、可行和可重现的。方法。在2021年2月至2023年12月期间,33名患者接受了冠状动脉血运重建手术,包括机器人采集左乳动脉和左降支冠状动脉或边缘冠状动脉的体外手控旁路。在进行混合血管重建手术的病例中,在手术前或手术后进行了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,并植入了药物洗脱支架。手术结果术后30天内和1年随访期间无死亡病例。值得注意的是,70%的患者在手术后立即在手术室拔管。术后机械通气的中位时间为 0 [0-4] 小时,在重症监护室的中位住院时间为 21 [20-48] 小时。在第 21 位患者之后,控制台和达芬奇® X 手术系统的器械逐渐减少。结论。本系列观察到的良好结果突出表明,机器人辅助冠状动脉搭桥术是一种成熟的技术,具有可重复性,尤其是在整合到混合策略中时。启动机器人辅助冠状动脉搭桥手术项目,尤其是在达芬奇® X 手术系统的使用方面具有成熟背景的情况下,可以有效实现。
{"title":"Implementation of Robotic Coronary Surgery after Established Mitral Robotic Program","authors":"Valentina Grazioli,&nbsp;Matteo Pettinari,&nbsp;Davide Personeni,&nbsp;Ascanio Graniero,&nbsp;Laura Giroletti,&nbsp;Giovanni Albano,&nbsp;Matteo Parrinello,&nbsp;Claudio Roscitano,&nbsp;Gianluca Torregrossa,&nbsp;Alfonso Agnino","doi":"10.1155/2024/8822068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8822068","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Aims</i>. We described our advancement in the field of robotic cardiac surgery, particularly in the context of coronary revascularization. We will outline how the application of the Da Vinci® X Surgical System in coronary surgery is safe, feasible, and reproducible after an adequate familiarization with the docking system, that could come from a previous mitral valve robotic program, and after a sufficient learning time period. <i>Methods</i>. Between February 2021 and December 2023, a cohort of 33 patients underwent coronary artery revascularization surgery, involving robotic harvesting of the left mammary artery and off-pump hand-direct bypass to the left descending coronary artery or marginal coronary artery. In cases of hybrid revascularization, percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent placement was performed either before or after surgery. <i>Results</i>. There were no mortalities within 30 days and at 1 year of follow-up after surgery. Notably, 70% of patients were extubated in the operating room immediately following the surgical procedure. The median postoperative mechanical ventilation time was 0 [0–4] hours, and the median length of stay in the intensive care unit was 21 [20–48] hours. A progressive reduction of the console and instrumental Da Vinci® X Surgical System was underling after the 21<sup>st</sup> patient. <i>Conclusion</i>. The promising outcomes observed in this series highlight that robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass represents a well-established technique that could be reproducible, especially when integrated into a hybrid strategy. Initiating a program in robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery can be effectively attained in particularly when a well-established background in Da Vinci® X Surgical System utilization is achieved.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8822068","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141973725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Short- and Midterm Outcomes of Off- and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass in Patients with a Mean Age of 65 or More: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 平均年龄为 65 岁或以上的患者使用非泵和泵上冠状动脉搭桥术的短期和中期疗效:系统回顾和元分析
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI: 10.1155/2024/3616580
Jake E. Trotman, Toluwalase F. Eboka, Neil A. Smart, Nicola King

Background. Advancing age is a nonmodifiable risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease. Furthermore, patients >65 years old are considered at high risk for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study was to investigate whether there were any differences in clinical outcomes for patients with a mean age ≥65 undergoing CABG on or off pump. Methods. Systematic searches were conducted in EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The key search terms used were “cardiopulmonary bypass” OR “On pump” AND “off pump” OR “beating heart” AND “coronary artery bypass grafting” OR “CABG” AND “age.” This was followed by a meta-analysis assessing the primary outcomes mortality, myocardial infarction, renal failure, and stroke in the short—(30 days) and midterm (12–44 months) and repeat revascularisation at midterm follow up. Secondary outcomes investigated included postoperative atrial fibrillation, number of units of blood transfused, ventilation time, length of intensive care unit stay, and length of hospital stay. Results. 14 studies involving 10,260 participants, 5,141 of whom had on-pump CABG and 5,119 of whom had off-pump CABG were identified. There was a significantly greater need for repeat revascularisation in the off-pump group (risk ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 2.01, I2 = 0%, p = 0.02) at midterm follow up. The off-pump group also had a shorter hospital stay. All other comparisons were insignificant. Conclusion. A number of different factors contribute to whether the increased need for repeat revascularisation for off-pump patients is truly clinically significant. This requires further investigation in meta-analysis based on longer-term trials in patients with a mean age ≥65. Otherwise, the similarity in clinical outcomes for patients in this age group suggests the choice to carry out CABG on or off pump should continue to be at the surgeon’s discretion.

背景。年龄增长是冠状动脉疾病发病的一个不可改变的危险因素。此外,65 岁的患者被认为是冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的高风险人群。本研究旨在探讨平均年龄≥65岁的患者在使用或不使用泵的情况下接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床结果是否存在差异。研究方法。在 EMBASE、PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 对照试验中央登记处 (CENTRAL) 中进行了系统检索。使用的关键检索词为 "心肺旁路术 "或 "开泵 "和 "关泵 "或 "心脏跳动 "和 "冠状动脉旁路移植术 "或 "CABG "和 "年龄"。随后进行了一项荟萃分析,评估了短期(30 天)和中期(12-44 个月)的死亡率、心肌梗死、肾功能衰竭和中风的主要结果,以及中期随访时重复血管再通的情况。次要研究结果包括术后心房颤动、输血单位数、通气时间、重症监护室住院时间和住院时间。研究结果14 项研究共涉及 10,260 名参与者,其中 5,141 人接受了体外循环心脏搭桥术,5,119 人接受了体外循环心脏搭桥术。在中期随访中,非泵组需要重复血管再通的比例明显更高(风险比 1.47,95% 置信区间 1.07 至 2.01,I2 = 0%,P = 0.02)。非泵组的住院时间也更短。所有其他比较结果均不显著。结论非泵患者重复血管重建需求的增加是否具有真正的临床意义,有许多不同的因素。这需要在对平均年龄≥65岁的患者进行的长期试验基础上进行的荟萃分析中进一步研究。否则,该年龄组患者临床结果的相似性表明,选择在泵上还是在泵下进行 CABG 应继续由外科医生决定。
{"title":"Short- and Midterm Outcomes of Off- and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass in Patients with a Mean Age of 65 or More: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Jake E. Trotman,&nbsp;Toluwalase F. Eboka,&nbsp;Neil A. Smart,&nbsp;Nicola King","doi":"10.1155/2024/3616580","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3616580","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Background</i>. Advancing age is a nonmodifiable risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease. Furthermore, patients &gt;65 years old are considered at high risk for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study was to investigate whether there were any differences in clinical outcomes for patients with a mean age ≥65 undergoing CABG on or off pump. <i>Methods</i>. Systematic searches were conducted in EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The key search terms used were “cardiopulmonary bypass” OR “On pump” AND “off pump” OR “beating heart” AND “coronary artery bypass grafting” OR “CABG” AND “age.” This was followed by a meta-analysis assessing the primary outcomes mortality, myocardial infarction, renal failure, and stroke in the short—(30 days) and midterm (12–44 months) and repeat revascularisation at midterm follow up. Secondary outcomes investigated included postoperative atrial fibrillation, number of units of blood transfused, ventilation time, length of intensive care unit stay, and length of hospital stay. <i>Results</i>. 14 studies involving 10,260 participants, 5,141 of whom had on-pump CABG and 5,119 of whom had off-pump CABG were identified. There was a significantly greater need for repeat revascularisation in the off-pump group (risk ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 2.01, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.02) at midterm follow up. The off-pump group also had a shorter hospital stay. All other comparisons were insignificant. <i>Conclusion</i>. A number of different factors contribute to whether the increased need for repeat revascularisation for off-pump patients is truly clinically significant. This requires further investigation in meta-analysis based on longer-term trials in patients with a mean age ≥65. Otherwise, the similarity in clinical outcomes for patients in this age group suggests the choice to carry out CABG on or off pump should continue to be at the surgeon’s discretion.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/3616580","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141967782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Donor Coronary Artery Disease on Recipient Outcomes in Heart Transplantation 供体冠状动脉疾病对心脏移植受体预后的影响
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI: 10.1155/2024/4957703
Aakash Shah, Justin Robinson, Corbin E. Goerlich, Chetan Pasrija, Bartley P. Griffith

Background. Efforts to expand the heart donor pool have included the use of extended criteria donors (e.g., advanced age or comorbid conditions). Another potential avenue is donor hearts with pre-existing coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database between 10/1/1987 and 12/3/2020. Postoperative complications, graft failure, and survival were examined between recipients of donor hearts with abnormal (CAD donor) versus normal (non-CAD donor) coronary angiogram. Analysis was performed in unmatched cohorts as well as after propensity score matching. Results. A total of 12,230 heart transplant recipients were identified, of which 940 (7.6%) had an abnormal donor coronary angiogram. There were no differences between CAD and non-CAD donor groups in acute rejection, stroke, or dialysis prior to discharge or treatment for rejection <1 year. However, the CAD donor group had a greater pacemaker incidence (5.2% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.02). After matching, 785 patients were in each group and there were no differences in perioperative outcomes or treatment for rejection <1 year. There was no difference in 10-year freedom from graft failure (53.1% vs. 54.6%, log rank = 1.03, and P = 0.31) or cumulative survival (54.7% vs. 55.8%, log rank = 0.63, and P = 0.43) between the matched CAD and non-CAD donor groups. Conclusion. The presence of CAD may not be a contraindication to transplantation. Carefully selected donor hearts with CAD may have equivalent postoperative and long-term outcomes to donor hearts without CAD. Further study in this area may expand the pool of donors.

背景。扩大心脏供体库的努力包括使用扩展标准供体(如高龄或合并症)。另一个潜在的途径是捐献预先存在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的心脏。方法。利用器官获取和移植网络数据库对 1987 年 10 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 12 日期间的情况进行了回顾性队列研究。对冠状动脉造影异常(CAD 供体)与冠状动脉造影正常(非 CAD 供体)的供体心脏受体之间的术后并发症、移植失败和存活率进行了研究。分析在非匹配队列和倾向得分匹配后进行。结果。共确定了 12,230 名心脏移植受者,其中 940 人(7.6%)的供体冠状动脉造影异常。在急性排斥反应、中风、出院前透析或排斥反应治疗<1年方面,CAD和非CAD供体组之间没有差异。不过,CAD供体组的起搏器安装率更高(5.2% vs. 3.6%,P = 0.02)。配对后,两组各有785名患者,围手术期结果或排斥反应治疗<1年无差异。匹配的 CAD 供体组和非 CAD 供体组在 10 年免于移植失败(53.1% 对 54.6%,对数秩 = 1.03,P = 0.31)或累积存活率(54.7% 对 55.8%,对数秩 = 0.63,P = 0.43)方面没有差异。结论存在 CAD 可能不是移植的禁忌症。精心挑选的有 CAD 的供体心脏可能与无 CAD 的供体心脏具有相同的术后和长期预后。这方面的进一步研究可能会扩大供体库。
{"title":"Impact of Donor Coronary Artery Disease on Recipient Outcomes in Heart Transplantation","authors":"Aakash Shah,&nbsp;Justin Robinson,&nbsp;Corbin E. Goerlich,&nbsp;Chetan Pasrija,&nbsp;Bartley P. Griffith","doi":"10.1155/2024/4957703","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4957703","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Background</i>. Efforts to expand the heart donor pool have included the use of extended criteria donors (e.g., advanced age or comorbid conditions). Another potential avenue is donor hearts with pre-existing coronary artery disease (CAD). <i>Methods</i>. A retrospective cohort study was performed using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database between 10/1/1987 and 12/3/2020. Postoperative complications, graft failure, and survival were examined between recipients of donor hearts with abnormal (CAD donor) versus normal (non-CAD donor) coronary angiogram. Analysis was performed in unmatched cohorts as well as after propensity score matching. <i>Results</i>. A total of 12,230 heart transplant recipients were identified, of which 940 (7.6%) had an abnormal donor coronary angiogram. There were no differences between CAD and non-CAD donor groups in acute rejection, stroke, or dialysis prior to discharge or treatment for rejection &lt;1 year. However, the CAD donor group had a greater pacemaker incidence (5.2% vs. 3.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.02). After matching, 785 patients were in each group and there were no differences in perioperative outcomes or treatment for rejection &lt;1 year. There was no difference in 10-year freedom from graft failure (53.1% vs. 54.6%, log rank = 1.03, and <i>P</i> = 0.31) or cumulative survival (54.7% vs. 55.8%, log rank = 0.63, and <i>P</i> = 0.43) between the matched CAD and non-CAD donor groups. <i>Conclusion</i>. The presence of CAD may not be a contraindication to transplantation. Carefully selected donor hearts with CAD may have equivalent postoperative and long-term outcomes to donor hearts without CAD. Further study in this area may expand the pool of donors.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4957703","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141967781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Branch-First Technique of Aortic Arch Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 主动脉弓置换的分支先行技术:系统回顾和元分析
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI: 10.1155/2024/1869656
Lubna Bakr, Tharushi Wijesena, Ravi De Silva, Jason M. Ali

Objectives. Aortic arch replacement is a major surgical intervention. This meta-analysis aims to combine the international literature on the branch-first technique to describe its outcomes and offer a comparison to the standard techniques. Methods. PubMed and Cochrane were searched for studies on the branch-first technique in aortic arch surgery including those comparing this technique with the conventional ones. Mortality, neurological complications, bleeding, and renal replacement therapy were the major endpoints of interest. Subgroup analysis was performed for both single- and double-armed studies. Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were used as summary estimates. The random-effects model was used for all outcomes. Results. Ten studies from three countries with a total of 498 patients were included. Proportional analysis of the branch-first technique estimated mortality of (3%, 95% CI [0.02–0.05]), neurological complications of (8%, 95% CI [0.03–0.13]), re-exploration for bleeding of (9%, 95% CI [0.05–0.13]), and renal replacement therapy of (9%, 95% CI [0.05–0.12]). This meta-analysis revealed no significant differences between the branch-first technique and the conventional technique in mortality (5% vs. 15%, OR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.08–1.18], p = 0.09, I2 = 40%), neurological complications (10% vs. 16%, OR = 0.53, 95% CI [0.24–1.21], p = 0.13, I2 = 0%), or renal replacement therapy (12% vs. 14%, OR = 0.72, 95% CI [0.33–1.59], p = 0.41, I2 = 0%). Conclusions. Branch-first technique provides a promising alternative approach in aortic arch surgery with no different surgical risks and potentially reduced operative complexity. Randomised controlled trials are needed to further investigate the safety and advantages of this technique.

目的。主动脉弓置换术是一项重要的外科干预手术。本荟萃分析旨在综合有关分支先行技术的国际文献,描述其结果并与标准技术进行比较。方法。在 PubMed 和 Cochrane 上搜索有关主动脉弓手术中分支先行技术的研究,包括将该技术与传统技术进行比较的研究。死亡率、神经系统并发症、出血和肾脏替代治疗是研究的主要终点。对单臂和双臂研究进行了分组分析。使用带有 95% 置信区间的比值比作为汇总估计值。所有结果均采用随机效应模型。研究结果来自三个国家的十项研究共纳入了 498 名患者。分支先行技术的比例分析估计死亡率为(3%,95% CI [0.02-0.05]),神经系统并发症为(8%,95% CI [0.03-0.13]),因出血而再次手术为(9%,95% CI [0.05-0.13]),肾脏替代治疗为(9%,95% CI [0.05-0.12])。这项荟萃分析显示,分支先行技术与传统技术在死亡率方面没有显著差异(5% vs. 15%,OR = 0.32,95% CI [0.08-1.18],P = 0.09,I2 = 40%)、神经系统并发症(10% vs. 16%,OR = 0.53,95% CI [0.24-1.21],p = 0.13,I2 = 0%)或肾脏替代治疗(12% vs. 14%,OR = 0.72,95% CI [0.33-1.59],p = 0.41,I2 = 0%)方面无显著差异。结论分支先行技术为主动脉弓手术提供了一种很有前景的替代方法,手术风险无差别,并有可能降低手术复杂性。需要进行随机对照试验来进一步研究该技术的安全性和优势。
{"title":"Branch-First Technique of Aortic Arch Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Lubna Bakr,&nbsp;Tharushi Wijesena,&nbsp;Ravi De Silva,&nbsp;Jason M. Ali","doi":"10.1155/2024/1869656","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1869656","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Objectives</i>. Aortic arch replacement is a major surgical intervention. This meta-analysis aims to combine the international literature on the branch-first technique to describe its outcomes and offer a comparison to the standard techniques. <i>Methods</i>. PubMed and Cochrane were searched for studies on the branch-first technique in aortic arch surgery including those comparing this technique with the conventional ones. Mortality, neurological complications, bleeding, and renal replacement therapy were the major endpoints of interest. Subgroup analysis was performed for both single- and double-armed studies. Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were used as summary estimates. The random-effects model was used for all outcomes. <i>Results</i>. Ten studies from three countries with a total of 498 patients were included. Proportional analysis of the branch-first technique estimated mortality of (3%, 95% CI [0.02–0.05]), neurological complications of (8%, 95% CI [0.03–0.13]), re-exploration for bleeding of (9%, 95% CI [0.05–0.13]), and renal replacement therapy of (9%, 95% CI [0.05–0.12]). This meta-analysis revealed no significant differences between the branch-first technique and the conventional technique in mortality (5% vs. 15%, OR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.08–1.18], <i>p</i> = 0.09, <i>I</i>2 = 40%), neurological complications (10% vs. 16%, OR = 0.53, 95% CI [0.24–1.21], <i>p</i> = 0.13, <i>I</i>2 = 0%), or renal replacement therapy (12% vs. 14%, OR = 0.72, 95% CI [0.33–1.59], <i>p</i> = 0.41, <i>I</i>2 = 0%). <i>Conclusions</i>. Branch-first technique provides a promising alternative approach in aortic arch surgery with no different surgical risks and potentially reduced operative complexity. Randomised controlled trials are needed to further investigate the safety and advantages of this technique.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1869656","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141966880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictive Value of Serum CIRP in Acute Kidney Injury after Total Aortic Arch Replacement 血清 CIRP 对全主动脉弓置换术后急性肾损伤的预测价值
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1155/2024/4814978
Ke Chen, Dongxu Wang, Minhua Fang, Pengyu Wang, Peng Hou, Yu Liu, Liming Yu, Zijun Zhou, Juan Gao, Yong Zhang

Objectives. To investigate the predictive value of serum cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRP) and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) after total aortic arch replacement. Methods. Eighty-six patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) admitted to hospital from October 2019 to February 2021 were retrospectively selected as the study subjects. All patients underwent total aortic arch replacement under moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA) with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP). Detection of the level of serum CIRP after admission and perioperative clinical data of patients were collected and analyzed. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria were used to stage renal function. Patients were divided into a non-AKI-3 group (n = 70) and an AKI-3 group (n = 16) according to the stage of postoperative renal function. The risk factors for postoperative AKI KDIGO stage 3 were analyzed by a multivariate logistic regression model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy. Results. In 86 patients, postoperative AKI-3 stage accounted for 18.6% (16/86). Compared with the non-AKI-3 group, the AKI-3 group had a higher preoperative BMI index, C-reactive protein, and CIRP level; a longer intraoperative cooling time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and aortic cross-clamping time; and a higher intraoperative coronary artery bypass ratio (all P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression results showed that CIRP (OR = 1.001, 95% CI: 1.000–1.002, P = 0.012) was an independent risk factor for postoperative AKI KDIGO stage 3. Conclusion. The serum CIRP is associated with postoperative acute kidney injury after total aortic arch replacement in ATAAD patients and may serve as a predictive indicator for early detection and intervention to improve the prognosis.

研究目的研究血清冷诱导 RNA 结合蛋白(CIRP)与全主动脉弓置换术后急性肾损伤(AKI)的预测价值。方法回顾性选取2019年10月至2021年2月入院的86例急性斯坦福A型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)患者作为研究对象。所有患者均在中度低体温循环停滞(MHCA)和选择性前向脑灌注(SACP)下接受了全主动脉弓置换术。研究人员收集并分析了患者入院后血清 CIRP 水平的检测结果以及围手术期的临床数据。肾病:改善全球预后(KDIGO)标准用于肾功能分期。根据术后肾功能分期,将患者分为非AKI-3组(70人)和AKI-3组(16人)。通过多变量逻辑回归模型分析了术后 AKI KDIGO 3 期的风险因素。采用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线评估诊断效果。结果在86例患者中,术后AKI-3期占18.6%(16/86)。与非 AKI-3 期组相比,AKI-3 期组的术前 BMI 指数、C 反应蛋白和 CIRP 水平更高;术中降温时间、心肺旁路时间和主动脉交叉钳夹时间更长;术中冠状动脉旁路比例更高(所有 P 均为 0.05)。多变量逻辑回归结果显示,CIRP(OR = 1.001,95% CI:1.000-1.002,P = 0.012)是术后 AKI KDIGO 3 期的独立危险因素。结论血清 CIRP 与 ATAAD 患者全主动脉弓置换术后急性肾损伤有关,可作为早期发现和干预以改善预后的预测指标。
{"title":"Predictive Value of Serum CIRP in Acute Kidney Injury after Total Aortic Arch Replacement","authors":"Ke Chen,&nbsp;Dongxu Wang,&nbsp;Minhua Fang,&nbsp;Pengyu Wang,&nbsp;Peng Hou,&nbsp;Yu Liu,&nbsp;Liming Yu,&nbsp;Zijun Zhou,&nbsp;Juan Gao,&nbsp;Yong Zhang","doi":"10.1155/2024/4814978","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4814978","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Objectives</i>. To investigate the predictive value of serum cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRP) and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) after total aortic arch replacement. <i>Methods</i>. Eighty-six patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) admitted to hospital from October 2019 to February 2021 were retrospectively selected as the study subjects. All patients underwent total aortic arch replacement under moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA) with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP). Detection of the level of serum CIRP after admission and perioperative clinical data of patients were collected and analyzed. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria were used to stage renal function. Patients were divided into a non-AKI-3 group (<i>n</i> = 70) and an AKI-3 group (<i>n</i> = 16) according to the stage of postoperative renal function. The risk factors for postoperative AKI KDIGO stage 3 were analyzed by a multivariate logistic regression model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy. <i>Results</i>. In 86 patients, postoperative AKI-3 stage accounted for 18.6% (16/86). Compared with the non-AKI-3 group, the AKI-3 group had a higher preoperative BMI index, C-reactive protein, and CIRP level; a longer intraoperative cooling time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and aortic cross-clamping time; and a higher intraoperative coronary artery bypass ratio (all <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression results showed that CIRP (OR = 1.001, 95% CI: 1.000–1.002, <i>P</i> = 0.012) was an independent risk factor for postoperative AKI KDIGO stage 3. <i>Conclusion</i>. The serum CIRP is associated with postoperative acute kidney injury after total aortic arch replacement in ATAAD patients and may serve as a predictive indicator for early detection and intervention to improve the prognosis.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4814978","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141966632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Thoracic Aortic Graft Infection: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnosis and Treatment Options with a Management Strategy Algorithm 探索胸主动脉移植感染:诊断和治疗方案的全面回顾及管理策略算法
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.1155/2024/2821237
Katie E. O’ Sullivan, Laura Casey, Pushpinder Sidhu, Alastair Graham, Christopher Austin, Michael Hunter

As surveillance and the diagnosis of pathology grow, increasing numbers of patients are undergoing major aortic interventions globally. As a result, surgeons and physicians will encounter thoracic aortic graft infections with increasing frequency. These infections are extremely challenging, high-risk problems to deal with. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management both medical and surgical of this high-risk complication. We provide proposed diagnostic criteria and suggested algorithm for the management of this important group of patients.

随着监控和病理诊断的发展,全球越来越多的患者正在接受主动脉大手术。因此,外科医生和内科医生会越来越频繁地遇到胸主动脉移植感染。这些感染是极具挑战性的高风险问题。本文全面概述了这种高风险并发症的发病机制、诊断和内外科处理方法。我们提出了诊断标准和处理这一重要患者群体的建议算法。
{"title":"Exploring Thoracic Aortic Graft Infection: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnosis and Treatment Options with a Management Strategy Algorithm","authors":"Katie E. O’ Sullivan,&nbsp;Laura Casey,&nbsp;Pushpinder Sidhu,&nbsp;Alastair Graham,&nbsp;Christopher Austin,&nbsp;Michael Hunter","doi":"10.1155/2024/2821237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2821237","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p>As surveillance and the diagnosis of pathology grow, increasing numbers of patients are undergoing major aortic interventions globally. As a result, surgeons and physicians will encounter thoracic aortic graft infections with increasing frequency. These infections are extremely challenging, high-risk problems to deal with. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management both medical and surgical of this high-risk complication. We provide proposed diagnostic criteria and suggested algorithm for the management of this important group of patients.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2821237","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141968377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Donation after Circulatory Death Does Not Worsen Survival after Heart Transplant for Patients with a Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device 循环性死亡后捐献不会恶化装有耐用左心室辅助装置的患者心脏移植后的存活率
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI: 10.1155/2024/5578819
Erin M. Schumer, Kukbin Choi, Doug A. Gouchoe, Divyaam Satija, Andrew N. Rosenbaum, Sudhir Kushwaha, Atta Behfar, Mauricio A. Villavicencio, Philip J. Spencer

Heart transplantation from donors after circulatory death (DCD) has demonstrated increased primary graft dysfunction. Durable mechanical circulatory (MCS) recipients have slightly higher perioperative risk but excellent long-term survival. We sought to determine if the use of DCD donors impacted outcomes for patients with MCS. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried from 2019 to 2023 for all adult recipients who underwent heart transplant with a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Outcomes were compared for recipients of DBD and DCD donors. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to compare survival. A total of 3449 recipients underwent heart transplant who met the study criteria. The number of DCD and DBD donors was 288 (8.4%) and 3161 (92.6%). There was no difference in the length of stay, postoperative dialysis, pacemaker, stroke rate, or in-hospital mortality. Recipients with durable LVADs of DCD donors had a higher rate of treatment for rejection within the first year. Overall survival was not different between DBD and DCD donors (p = 0.153). Postoperative and survival outcomes for DCD donation remain similar between patients with and without MCS. These findings may help decrease waitlist time for patients with durable MCS.

循环死亡(DCD)后捐献者的心脏移植显示原发性移植物功能障碍增加。持久机械循环(MCS)受者的围手术期风险稍高,但长期存活率极佳。我们试图确定使用 DCD 供体是否会影响 MCS 患者的预后。我们查询了器官共享联合网络(United Network for Organ Sharing)数据库2019年至2023年期间所有使用耐用左心室辅助装置(LVAD)进行心脏移植的成年受者。对DBD和DCD供体的受者的结果进行了比较。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析比较存活率。共有 3449 名符合研究标准的受者接受了心脏移植手术。DCD和DBD供体的数量分别为288例(8.4%)和3161例(92.6%)。在住院时间、术后透析、起搏器、中风率和院内死亡率方面没有差异。DCD捐献者的耐用LVAD受者在第一年内接受排斥治疗的比例较高。DBD 和 DCD 供体的总体存活率没有差异(p = 0.153)。DCD捐献的术后和存活结果在患有和不患有MCS的患者之间仍然相似。这些发现可能有助于减少耐久性 MCS 患者的等待时间。
{"title":"Donation after Circulatory Death Does Not Worsen Survival after Heart Transplant for Patients with a Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device","authors":"Erin M. Schumer,&nbsp;Kukbin Choi,&nbsp;Doug A. Gouchoe,&nbsp;Divyaam Satija,&nbsp;Andrew N. Rosenbaum,&nbsp;Sudhir Kushwaha,&nbsp;Atta Behfar,&nbsp;Mauricio A. Villavicencio,&nbsp;Philip J. Spencer","doi":"10.1155/2024/5578819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5578819","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p>Heart transplantation from donors after circulatory death (DCD) has demonstrated increased primary graft dysfunction. Durable mechanical circulatory (MCS) recipients have slightly higher perioperative risk but excellent long-term survival. We sought to determine if the use of DCD donors impacted outcomes for patients with MCS. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried from 2019 to 2023 for all adult recipients who underwent heart transplant with a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Outcomes were compared for recipients of DBD and DCD donors. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to compare survival. A total of 3449 recipients underwent heart transplant who met the study criteria. The number of DCD and DBD donors was 288 (8.4%) and 3161 (92.6%). There was no difference in the length of stay, postoperative dialysis, pacemaker, stroke rate, or in-hospital mortality. Recipients with durable LVADs of DCD donors had a higher rate of treatment for rejection within the first year. Overall survival was not different between DBD and DCD donors (<i>p</i> = 0.153). Postoperative and survival outcomes for DCD donation remain similar between patients with and without MCS. These findings may help decrease waitlist time for patients with durable MCS.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5578819","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141536555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Training in Advanced Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in the United Kingdom 英国高级冠状动脉搭桥手术培训
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1155/2024/2140060
Jeremy Chan, Shubhra Sinha, Daniel P. Fudulu, Tim Dong, Pradeep Narayan, Gianni D. Angelini

Objective. The learning curve of coronary artery bypass grafting with multiple arterial grafting and without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump) is perceived as an advanced subspeciality associated with increased surgical risk. We compared the trends and early clinical outcomes between trainees and consultants as the first operator in the United Kingdom. Methods. All patients who underwent elective or urgent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting from 1996 to 2019 were extracted from the National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit database. Trends and early clinical outcomes between trainees and consultants as the first operator were compared in the whole cohort and after propensity score matching. Results. Of the total coronary artery bypass graft procedures, trainees performed 24.39% (n = 79759/327025). Trainees performed 27.10% (63934/235920) on-pump without multiple arterial graft procedures compared to consultants. The consultants had a shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (82.81 (SD: 35.36) vs 86.21 (SD: 30.07) minutes, p < 0.001) and aortic cross-clamp time (48.05 (SD: 22.46) vs 50.66 (SD: 19.49) minutes, p < 0.001). However, consultants had a higher mortality (1.6% vs 1.0%, p < 0.001) and incidence of postoperative dialysis (2.1% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001). Trainees performed 16.78% (8089/48220) multiple arterial graft procedures, with no differences compared with consultants for in-hospital mortality (1.0% vs 0.9%, p = 0.42), cerebral vascular accident (transient ischaemic attack (0.5% vs 0.5%) and permanent stroke (0.6% vs 0.4%), p = 0.33), return to theatre (4.2% vs 4.47%, p = 0.089), postoperative renal dialysis (1.4% vs 1.1%, p = 0.076), and deep sternal wound infection (0.6% vs 0.6%, p = 0.87). Trainees performed 17.17% (8661/41778) off-pump cases. Consultants had a higher in-hospital mortality (1.2% vs 0.9%, p = 0.045) with no differences in cerebral vascular accident (transient ischaemic attack (0.2% vs 0.3%) and permanent stroke (0.4% vs 0.4%), p = 0.27), return to theatre (3.8% vs 3.9%, p = 0.69), postoperative renal dialysis (2.0% vs 1.6%, p = 0.059), and deep sternal wound infection (1.0% vs 0.8%, p = 0.66). Conclusion. Trainees in the United Kingdom have adequate exposure to advanced coronary surgery without compromising patients’ safety.

目的。多动脉移植和不使用心肺旁路(非泵)的冠状动脉旁路移植术的学习曲线被认为是与手术风险增加相关的高级亚专科。我们比较了英国受训者和顾问作为第一手术者的趋势和早期临床结果。方法从国家成人心脏外科审计数据库中提取了 1996 年至 2019 年期间接受择期或紧急孤立冠状动脉旁路移植术的所有患者。在整个队列和倾向得分匹配后,比较了受训者和顾问作为第一操作者的趋势和早期临床结果。结果在所有冠状动脉旁路移植手术中,受训人员完成了 24.39% 的手术(n = 79759/327025)。与顾问相比,受训人员进行了27.10%(63934/235920)的泵上无多处动脉移植手术。顾问医师的心肺旁路时间(82.81 (SD: 35.36) vs 86.21 (SD: 30.07) 分钟,p < 0.001)和主动脉交叉钳夹时间(48.05 (SD: 22.46) vs 50.66 (SD: 19.49) 分钟,p < 0.001)更短。然而,顾问的死亡率(1.6% vs 1.0%,p <0.001)和术后透析发生率(2.1% vs 1.5%,p <0.001)较高。受训人员进行了 16.78% (8089/48220)的多次动脉移植手术,与顾问相比,在院内死亡率(1.0% vs 0.9%,p = 0.42)、脑血管意外(短暂性缺血发作(0.5% vs 0.5%)和永久性中风(0.6% vs 0.4%),p = 0.33)、重返手术室(4.2% vs 4.47%,p = 0.089)、术后肾透析(1.4% vs 1.1%,p = 0.076)和胸骨深伤口感染(0.6% vs 0.6%,p = 0.87)。受训人员实施了17.17%(8661/41778)的非泵手术。顾问医师的院内死亡率较高(1.2% vs 0.9%,p = 0.045),而脑血管意外(短暂性缺血发作(0.2% vs 0.3%)和永久性中风(0.4% vs 0.4%,p = 0.27)、重返手术室(3.8% vs 3.9%,p = 0.69)、术后肾透析(2.0% vs 1.6%,p = 0.059)和胸骨深伤口感染(1.0% vs 0.8%,p = 0.66)方面没有差异。)结论英国的受训人员有足够的机会接触先进的冠状动脉手术,同时不会影响患者的安全。
{"title":"Training in Advanced Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in the United Kingdom","authors":"Jeremy Chan,&nbsp;Shubhra Sinha,&nbsp;Daniel P. Fudulu,&nbsp;Tim Dong,&nbsp;Pradeep Narayan,&nbsp;Gianni D. Angelini","doi":"10.1155/2024/2140060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2140060","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 <p><i>Objective</i>. The learning curve of coronary artery bypass grafting with multiple arterial grafting and without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump) is perceived as an advanced subspeciality associated with increased surgical risk. We compared the trends and early clinical outcomes between trainees and consultants as the first operator in the United Kingdom. <i>Methods</i>. All patients who underwent elective or urgent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting from 1996 to 2019 were extracted from the National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit database. Trends and early clinical outcomes between trainees and consultants as the first operator were compared in the whole cohort and after propensity score matching. <i>Results</i>. Of the total coronary artery bypass graft procedures, trainees performed 24.39% (<i>n</i> = 79759/327025). Trainees performed 27.10% (63934/235920) on-pump without multiple arterial graft procedures compared to consultants. The consultants had a shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (82.81 (SD: 35.36) vs 86.21 (SD: 30.07) minutes, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and aortic cross-clamp time (48.05 (SD: 22.46) vs 50.66 (SD: 19.49) minutes, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). However, consultants had a higher mortality (1.6% vs 1.0%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and incidence of postoperative dialysis (2.1% vs 1.5%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Trainees performed 16.78% (8089/48220) multiple arterial graft procedures, with no differences compared with consultants for in-hospital mortality (1.0% vs 0.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.42), cerebral vascular accident (transient ischaemic attack (0.5% vs 0.5%) and permanent stroke (0.6% vs 0.4%), <i>p</i> = 0.33), return to theatre (4.2% vs 4.47%, <i>p</i> = 0.089), postoperative renal dialysis (1.4% vs 1.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.076), and deep sternal wound infection (0.6% vs 0.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.87). Trainees performed 17.17% (8661/41778) off-pump cases. Consultants had a higher in-hospital mortality (1.2% vs 0.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.045) with no differences in cerebral vascular accident (transient ischaemic attack (0.2% vs 0.3%) and permanent stroke (0.4% vs 0.4%), <i>p</i> = 0.27), return to theatre (3.8% vs 3.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.69), postoperative renal dialysis (2.0% vs 1.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.059), and deep sternal wound infection (1.0% vs 0.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.66). <i>Conclusion</i>. Trainees in the United Kingdom have adequate exposure to advanced coronary surgery without compromising patients’ safety.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":15367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/2140060","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141430313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Cardiac Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1