手术主动脉瓣置换术后急性肾损伤的 ACEF 评分预测价值

Gokhan Demirci, A. R. Demir, Serkan Kahraman, S. Çamcı, Emre Yilmaz
{"title":"手术主动脉瓣置换术后急性肾损伤的 ACEF 评分预测价值","authors":"Gokhan Demirci, A. R. Demir, Serkan Kahraman, S. Çamcı, Emre Yilmaz","doi":"10.18621/eurj.1334048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Aortic stenosis is the most common form of degenerative heart valve disease. Acute kidney injury (AKI) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a common complication and is related to worse outcomes. Age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score is a simple scoring method that includes three parameters. Our study aimed to evaluate whether ACEF score could predict the development of AKI in patients who underwent AVR.\nMethods: A total of 366 consecutive patients who underwent isolated AVR for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis were evaluated retrospectively. The development of AKI was the primary endpoint of the study. The ACEF score was calculated by the formula: age (years)/left ventricular ejection fraction (%) + 1 (if baseline serum creatinine was >2 mg/dL). According to the ACEF score the study population was divided into two groups.\nResults: AKI was developed in 66 (18%) patients. The cut-off value of the ACEF score for the prediction of AKI was 1.07 with a sensitivity of 69.7% and a specificity of 56.7% (AUC 0.663; 95% CI: 0.589-0.736; P<0.001). AKI incidence was found to be higher in patients with high ACEF score than low ACEF score [46 (26.1%) vs. 20 (10.5%); P<0.001]. In addition, ACEF score [OR: 2.599; 95% CI: 1.399-4.828; P=0.002] and hemoglobin levels (OR: 0.837; 95% CI: 0.729-0.961; P=0.012) were found to be independent predictors of AKI. \nConclusions: Our study revealed that the ACEF score is an independent predictor of AKI. ACEF score, as a simple and objective score, can be useful in predicting AKI in patients undergoing AVR.","PeriodicalId":22571,"journal":{"name":"The European Research Journal","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive value of ACEF score for acute kidney injury after surgical aortic valve replacement\",\"authors\":\"Gokhan Demirci, A. R. Demir, Serkan Kahraman, S. Çamcı, Emre Yilmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.18621/eurj.1334048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Aortic stenosis is the most common form of degenerative heart valve disease. Acute kidney injury (AKI) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a common complication and is related to worse outcomes. Age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score is a simple scoring method that includes three parameters. Our study aimed to evaluate whether ACEF score could predict the development of AKI in patients who underwent AVR.\\nMethods: A total of 366 consecutive patients who underwent isolated AVR for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis were evaluated retrospectively. The development of AKI was the primary endpoint of the study. The ACEF score was calculated by the formula: age (years)/left ventricular ejection fraction (%) + 1 (if baseline serum creatinine was >2 mg/dL). According to the ACEF score the study population was divided into two groups.\\nResults: AKI was developed in 66 (18%) patients. The cut-off value of the ACEF score for the prediction of AKI was 1.07 with a sensitivity of 69.7% and a specificity of 56.7% (AUC 0.663; 95% CI: 0.589-0.736; P<0.001). AKI incidence was found to be higher in patients with high ACEF score than low ACEF score [46 (26.1%) vs. 20 (10.5%); P<0.001]. In addition, ACEF score [OR: 2.599; 95% CI: 1.399-4.828; P=0.002] and hemoglobin levels (OR: 0.837; 95% CI: 0.729-0.961; P=0.012) were found to be independent predictors of AKI. \\nConclusions: Our study revealed that the ACEF score is an independent predictor of AKI. ACEF score, as a simple and objective score, can be useful in predicting AKI in patients undergoing AVR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1334048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1334048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:主动脉瓣狭窄是最常见的退行性心脏瓣膜病。主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)后的急性肾损伤(AKI)是一种常见的并发症,与较差的预后有关。年龄、肌酐和射血分数(ACEF)评分是一种简单的评分方法,包括三个参数。我们的研究旨在评估 ACEF 评分能否预测接受 AVR 患者发生 AKI 的情况:回顾性评估了因症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄而接受孤立房室成形术的 366 例连续患者。发生 AKI 是研究的主要终点。ACEF 评分的计算公式为:年龄(岁)/左室射血分数(%)+1(如果基线血清肌酐大于 2 毫克/分升)。根据 ACEF 评分将研究对象分为两组:结果:66 例(18%)患者出现了 AKI。ACEF 评分预测 AKI 的临界值为 1.07,灵敏度为 69.7%,特异度为 56.7%(AUC 0.663;95% CI:0.589-0.736;P<0.001)。发现 ACEF 得分高的患者 AKI 发生率高于 ACEF 得分低的患者 [46 (26.1%) vs. 20 (10.5%); P<0.001]。此外,ACEF评分[OR:2.599;95% CI:1.399-4.828;P=0.002]和血红蛋白水平(OR:0.837;95% CI:0.729-0.961;P=0.012)是AKI的独立预测因素。结论我们的研究显示,ACEF 评分是 AKI 的独立预测因子。ACEF 评分作为一种简单而客观的评分,可用于预测接受 AVR 患者的 AKI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictive value of ACEF score for acute kidney injury after surgical aortic valve replacement
Objectives: Aortic stenosis is the most common form of degenerative heart valve disease. Acute kidney injury (AKI) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a common complication and is related to worse outcomes. Age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score is a simple scoring method that includes three parameters. Our study aimed to evaluate whether ACEF score could predict the development of AKI in patients who underwent AVR. Methods: A total of 366 consecutive patients who underwent isolated AVR for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis were evaluated retrospectively. The development of AKI was the primary endpoint of the study. The ACEF score was calculated by the formula: age (years)/left ventricular ejection fraction (%) + 1 (if baseline serum creatinine was >2 mg/dL). According to the ACEF score the study population was divided into two groups. Results: AKI was developed in 66 (18%) patients. The cut-off value of the ACEF score for the prediction of AKI was 1.07 with a sensitivity of 69.7% and a specificity of 56.7% (AUC 0.663; 95% CI: 0.589-0.736; P<0.001). AKI incidence was found to be higher in patients with high ACEF score than low ACEF score [46 (26.1%) vs. 20 (10.5%); P<0.001]. In addition, ACEF score [OR: 2.599; 95% CI: 1.399-4.828; P=0.002] and hemoglobin levels (OR: 0.837; 95% CI: 0.729-0.961; P=0.012) were found to be independent predictors of AKI. Conclusions: Our study revealed that the ACEF score is an independent predictor of AKI. ACEF score, as a simple and objective score, can be useful in predicting AKI in patients undergoing AVR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in pseudophakic bullous keratopathy: comparison of visual outcomes, graft survival rates, and complications Eisenmenger syndrome presenting with chronic thromboembolic disease Exploring menopausal dynamics: a cross-sectional analysis of age, symptomatology, and sociodemographic influences in a developing population of women aged 40-60 Rheumatology nurses’ knowledge and practices on pain management Relationship between fortilin levels and coronary ischemia in heart failure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1