儿童时期的社会关怀与成年后的结果:对少数民族儿童的双重打击?

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Longitudinal and Life Course Studies Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI:10.1332/17579597y2023d000000008
Amanda Sacker, Emily T. Murray, Barbara Maughan, Rebecca E. Lacey
{"title":"儿童时期的社会关怀与成年后的结果:对少数民族儿童的双重打击?","authors":"Amanda Sacker, Emily T. Murray, Barbara Maughan, Rebecca E. Lacey","doi":"10.1332/17579597y2023d000000008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children in social care report poor outcomes in many aspects of their later lives. Less is known about differences by ethnicity.\nWe examined the health, socio-economic, family and living arrangements across the first three decades of adult life by the intersection of ethnicity (White, Black, South Asian) with social care.\nLinked census and life events data for a 1% sample of the population of England and Wales in the ONS Longitudinal Study. Participants were dependent children in 1971–2001 (analytic sample n = 669,474).\nCategorical regression models compared health, socio-economic circumstances, living arrangements and relationships, controlling for country of birth, childhood census year, childhood and adult age in years, gender, and head of household social class, qualifications, employment status and marital status.\nAdverse adult outcomes following social care in childhood were conditional on the interaction of social care with ethnicity, mainly in the socio-economic domain. for some outcomes the White group had the poorest outcomes: for example, 15% lower probability of being employed than other White people (65% versus 80%). Black adults with a history of social care did not differ from other Black adults, except for the lowest probability of acquiring their own home, while care-experienced South Asian adults did not differ from other South Asian adults.\nMinority ethnicity moderated the social care to adult outcomes relationship in both positive and negative ways. Overall, there was little evidence of intersectionality for Black children in social care affecting their life chances.","PeriodicalId":45988,"journal":{"name":"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies","volume":"53 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social care in childhood and adult outcomes: double whammy for minority children?\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Sacker, Emily T. Murray, Barbara Maughan, Rebecca E. Lacey\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/17579597y2023d000000008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Children in social care report poor outcomes in many aspects of their later lives. Less is known about differences by ethnicity.\\nWe examined the health, socio-economic, family and living arrangements across the first three decades of adult life by the intersection of ethnicity (White, Black, South Asian) with social care.\\nLinked census and life events data for a 1% sample of the population of England and Wales in the ONS Longitudinal Study. Participants were dependent children in 1971–2001 (analytic sample n = 669,474).\\nCategorical regression models compared health, socio-economic circumstances, living arrangements and relationships, controlling for country of birth, childhood census year, childhood and adult age in years, gender, and head of household social class, qualifications, employment status and marital status.\\nAdverse adult outcomes following social care in childhood were conditional on the interaction of social care with ethnicity, mainly in the socio-economic domain. for some outcomes the White group had the poorest outcomes: for example, 15% lower probability of being employed than other White people (65% versus 80%). Black adults with a history of social care did not differ from other Black adults, except for the lowest probability of acquiring their own home, while care-experienced South Asian adults did not differ from other South Asian adults.\\nMinority ethnicity moderated the social care to adult outcomes relationship in both positive and negative ways. Overall, there was little evidence of intersectionality for Black children in social care affecting their life chances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies\",\"volume\":\"53 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/17579597y2023d000000008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/17579597y2023d000000008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

接受社会护理的儿童在其晚年生活的许多方面都表现不佳。我们根据种族(白人、黑人、南亚人)与社会关怀的交叉点,研究了成年后前三十年的健康、社会经济、家庭和生活安排。分类回归模型比较了健康、社会经济环境、生活安排和人际关系,并对出生国、儿童普查年份、儿童和成人年龄(岁)、性别、户主的社会阶层、学历、就业状况和婚姻状况进行了控制。童年时期接受社会关怀后,成年后的不利结果取决于社会关怀与种族的交互作用,主要体现在社会经济领域。在某些结果中,白人群体的结果最差:例如,就业概率比其他白人低 15%(65% 对 80%)。有社会关怀经历的黑人成年人与其他黑人成年人没有区别,只是获得自己住房的概率最低,而有关怀经历的南亚成年人与其他南亚成年人没有区别。总体而言,几乎没有证据表明黑人儿童在社会关怀方面的交叉性会影响他们的生活机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social care in childhood and adult outcomes: double whammy for minority children?
Children in social care report poor outcomes in many aspects of their later lives. Less is known about differences by ethnicity. We examined the health, socio-economic, family and living arrangements across the first three decades of adult life by the intersection of ethnicity (White, Black, South Asian) with social care. Linked census and life events data for a 1% sample of the population of England and Wales in the ONS Longitudinal Study. Participants were dependent children in 1971–2001 (analytic sample n = 669,474). Categorical regression models compared health, socio-economic circumstances, living arrangements and relationships, controlling for country of birth, childhood census year, childhood and adult age in years, gender, and head of household social class, qualifications, employment status and marital status. Adverse adult outcomes following social care in childhood were conditional on the interaction of social care with ethnicity, mainly in the socio-economic domain. for some outcomes the White group had the poorest outcomes: for example, 15% lower probability of being employed than other White people (65% versus 80%). Black adults with a history of social care did not differ from other Black adults, except for the lowest probability of acquiring their own home, while care-experienced South Asian adults did not differ from other South Asian adults. Minority ethnicity moderated the social care to adult outcomes relationship in both positive and negative ways. Overall, there was little evidence of intersectionality for Black children in social care affecting their life chances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
John Bynner obituary: to a pioneer of social research using comparative longitudinal data (28 April 1938 to 22 August 2023). Creating our legacy. Mediation of risk factors for high blood pressure in four racial and ethnic populations. Socio-economic gradients in pupils' self-efficacy: evidence, evolution and main drivers during the primary school years in France. SHARE Corona Surveys: study profile.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1