生物刺激剂对洋葱(Allium cepa)生物量和抗氧化状态的影响因生产方法而异

IF 3.1 3区 农林科学 Q1 HORTICULTURE Horticulturae Pub Date : 2023-12-16 DOI:10.3390/horticulturae9121345
Đ. Vojnović, I. Maksimović, Aleksandra N. Tepić Horecki, Danijela Žunić, B. Adamović, Anita Milić, Zdravko M. Šumić, V. Sabadoš, Ž. Ilin
{"title":"生物刺激剂对洋葱(Allium cepa)生物量和抗氧化状态的影响因生产方法而异","authors":"Đ. Vojnović, I. Maksimović, Aleksandra N. Tepić Horecki, Danijela Žunić, B. Adamović, Anita Milić, Zdravko M. Šumić, V. Sabadoš, Ž. Ilin","doi":"10.3390/horticulturae9121345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Onions, essential in various salads and cooked dishes, are sought after by producers for high yields, while consumers value their quality, particularly the presence of antioxidant compounds. This study investigates the impact of production methods and biostimulants on the biomass yield and quality of onions. The two-year experiment was conducted in Vojvodina, Serbia, and compared directly seeded (DS) and from-set (FS) onions with four biostimulant treatments: control (C), seaweed extracts (T1), humic and fulvic acids (T2), and Trichoderma sp. (T3). DS onions yielded significantly more biomass, while FS onions had higher dry matter content. DS onions treated with T1 showed a significant increase in phenols (↑ 5.30%), while T2 and T3 led to declines (↓ 8.66% and ↓ 7.55%, respectively). All biostimulants reduced phenol content in FS onions. T1 and T2 significantly increased the flavonoid concentration in DS onions, with no significant changes in FS onions. T1 enhanced antioxidant properties in DS onions and reduced them in FS onions. Additionally, T2 and T3 decreased antioxidant activity in both DS and FS onions, as evidenced by DPPH, FRAP, and ABTS tests. These findings guide onion production, advocating for the fresh consumption of DS onions with higher biomass and industrial processing suitability for FS onions, emphasizing the potential of bio-based products.","PeriodicalId":13034,"journal":{"name":"Horticulturae","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biostimulants Affect Differently Biomass and Antioxidant Status of Onion (Allium cepa) Depending on Production Method\",\"authors\":\"Đ. Vojnović, I. Maksimović, Aleksandra N. Tepić Horecki, Danijela Žunić, B. Adamović, Anita Milić, Zdravko M. Šumić, V. Sabadoš, Ž. Ilin\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/horticulturae9121345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Onions, essential in various salads and cooked dishes, are sought after by producers for high yields, while consumers value their quality, particularly the presence of antioxidant compounds. This study investigates the impact of production methods and biostimulants on the biomass yield and quality of onions. The two-year experiment was conducted in Vojvodina, Serbia, and compared directly seeded (DS) and from-set (FS) onions with four biostimulant treatments: control (C), seaweed extracts (T1), humic and fulvic acids (T2), and Trichoderma sp. (T3). DS onions yielded significantly more biomass, while FS onions had higher dry matter content. DS onions treated with T1 showed a significant increase in phenols (↑ 5.30%), while T2 and T3 led to declines (↓ 8.66% and ↓ 7.55%, respectively). All biostimulants reduced phenol content in FS onions. T1 and T2 significantly increased the flavonoid concentration in DS onions, with no significant changes in FS onions. T1 enhanced antioxidant properties in DS onions and reduced them in FS onions. Additionally, T2 and T3 decreased antioxidant activity in both DS and FS onions, as evidenced by DPPH, FRAP, and ABTS tests. These findings guide onion production, advocating for the fresh consumption of DS onions with higher biomass and industrial processing suitability for FS onions, emphasizing the potential of bio-based products.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Horticulturae\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Horticulturae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9121345\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HORTICULTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horticulturae","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9121345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HORTICULTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

洋葱是各种沙拉和烹饪菜肴中不可或缺的食物,生产者追求洋葱的高产量,而消费者则看重洋葱的质量,尤其是其中含有的抗氧化化合物。本研究调查了生产方法和生物刺激剂对洋葱生物量产量和质量的影响。实验在塞尔维亚伏伊伏丁那省进行,为期两年,比较了直接播种(DS)洋葱和从播种(FS)洋葱与四种生物刺激剂处理:对照(C)、海藻提取物(T1)、腐植酸和富勒酸(T2)以及毛霉(T3)。DS 洋葱的生物量产量明显更高,而 FS 洋葱的干物质含量更高。用 T1 处理的 DS 洋葱的酚含量显著增加(↑ 5.30%),而 T2 和 T3 则导致酚含量下降(分别为 ↓ 8.66% 和 ↓ 7.55%)。所有生物刺激剂都降低了 FS 洋葱中的酚含量。T1 和 T2 能明显提高 DS 型洋葱中黄酮类化合物的浓度,而 FS 型洋葱中的黄酮类化合物浓度没有明显变化。T1 提高了 DS 型洋葱的抗氧化性,降低了 FS 型洋葱的抗氧化性。此外,从 DPPH、FRAP 和 ABTS 测试中可以看出,T2 和 T3 降低了 DS 和 FS 洋葱的抗氧化活性。这些发现为洋葱生产提供了指导,提倡新鲜食用生物量较高的 DS 洋葱,而 FS 洋葱则适合工业加工,强调了生物基产品的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biostimulants Affect Differently Biomass and Antioxidant Status of Onion (Allium cepa) Depending on Production Method
Onions, essential in various salads and cooked dishes, are sought after by producers for high yields, while consumers value their quality, particularly the presence of antioxidant compounds. This study investigates the impact of production methods and biostimulants on the biomass yield and quality of onions. The two-year experiment was conducted in Vojvodina, Serbia, and compared directly seeded (DS) and from-set (FS) onions with four biostimulant treatments: control (C), seaweed extracts (T1), humic and fulvic acids (T2), and Trichoderma sp. (T3). DS onions yielded significantly more biomass, while FS onions had higher dry matter content. DS onions treated with T1 showed a significant increase in phenols (↑ 5.30%), while T2 and T3 led to declines (↓ 8.66% and ↓ 7.55%, respectively). All biostimulants reduced phenol content in FS onions. T1 and T2 significantly increased the flavonoid concentration in DS onions, with no significant changes in FS onions. T1 enhanced antioxidant properties in DS onions and reduced them in FS onions. Additionally, T2 and T3 decreased antioxidant activity in both DS and FS onions, as evidenced by DPPH, FRAP, and ABTS tests. These findings guide onion production, advocating for the fresh consumption of DS onions with higher biomass and industrial processing suitability for FS onions, emphasizing the potential of bio-based products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Horticulturae
Horticulturae HORTICULTURE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
998
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
An Innovative Co-Cultivation of Microalgae and Actinomycete-Inoculated Lettuce in a Hydroponic Deep-Water Culture System for the Sustainable Development of a Food–Agriculture–Energy Nexus Growth, Triterpene Glycosides, and Antioxidant Activities of Centella asiatica L. Urban Grown in a Controlled Environment with Different Nutrient Solution Formulations and LED Light Intensities Melatonin Promotes Accumulation of Resveratrol and Its Derivatives through Upregulation of PAL, 4CL, C4H, and STS in Grape Seeds Transcription Factor MdPLT1 Involved Adventitious Root Initiation in Apple Rootstocks Assessment of Phytotoxicity in Untreated and Electrochemically Treated Leachates through the Analysis of Early Seed Growth and Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectroscopy Characterization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1