荷兰手语的偏极性问题表(NGT)

M. Oomen, F. Roelofsen
{"title":"荷兰手语的偏极性问题表(NGT)","authors":"M. Oomen, F. Roelofsen","doi":"10.31009/feast.i5.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We identify several polar question forms in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT)through a production experiment in which we manipulate two types of biases: (i) theprior expectations of the person asking the question, and (ii) the evidence available inthe immediate context of utterance. Our analysis in the present paper focuses on formsinvolving headshake. We find that in some cases headshake expresses negation, as expected,but in other cases it fulfils another function, namely, it is part of a sentence-finalphrase either expressing uncertainty or signalling a request for a response from the addressee,or possibly both at the same time. We further observe that each question formhas a distinct ‘bias profile’, indicating a certain combination of prior expectations andcontextual evidence. Besides these empirical findings, our study also makes a methodologicalcontribution: our experimental design could be used in future work to identifypolar question forms with different bias profiles in sign languages other than NGT, aswell as visual cues accompanying polar questions with different bias profiles in spokenlanguages.","PeriodicalId":164096,"journal":{"name":"FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign language Theory","volume":"4 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biased polar question forms in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT)\",\"authors\":\"M. Oomen, F. Roelofsen\",\"doi\":\"10.31009/feast.i5.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We identify several polar question forms in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT)through a production experiment in which we manipulate two types of biases: (i) theprior expectations of the person asking the question, and (ii) the evidence available inthe immediate context of utterance. Our analysis in the present paper focuses on formsinvolving headshake. We find that in some cases headshake expresses negation, as expected,but in other cases it fulfils another function, namely, it is part of a sentence-finalphrase either expressing uncertainty or signalling a request for a response from the addressee,or possibly both at the same time. We further observe that each question formhas a distinct ‘bias profile’, indicating a certain combination of prior expectations andcontextual evidence. Besides these empirical findings, our study also makes a methodologicalcontribution: our experimental design could be used in future work to identifypolar question forms with different bias profiles in sign languages other than NGT, aswell as visual cues accompanying polar questions with different bias profiles in spokenlanguages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign language Theory\",\"volume\":\"4 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign language Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31009/feast.i5.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign language Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31009/feast.i5.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们通过一个制作实验确定了荷兰手语(NGT)中的几种极性提问形式,在这个实验中,我们操纵了两种类型的偏差:(i) 提问者之前的期望,以及 (ii) 语篇的直接语境中可用的证据。本文的分析重点是涉及摇头的形式。我们发现,在某些情况下,摇头表示否定,正如预期的那样,但在另一些情况下,摇头却有另一种功能,即它是句末短语的一部分,要么表示不确定性,要么表示要求被问者做出回应,或者可能同时表示这两种功能。我们进一步观察到,每种提问形式都有独特的 "偏差特征",表明了先前预期和语境证据的某种结合。除了这些实证研究结果之外,我们的研究还在方法论上做出了贡献:我们的实验设计可以在未来的工作中用于识别 NGT 以外的其他手语中具有不同偏向特征的极性提问形式,以及口语中具有不同偏向特征的极性提问所伴随的视觉线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biased polar question forms in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT)
We identify several polar question forms in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT)through a production experiment in which we manipulate two types of biases: (i) theprior expectations of the person asking the question, and (ii) the evidence available inthe immediate context of utterance. Our analysis in the present paper focuses on formsinvolving headshake. We find that in some cases headshake expresses negation, as expected,but in other cases it fulfils another function, namely, it is part of a sentence-finalphrase either expressing uncertainty or signalling a request for a response from the addressee,or possibly both at the same time. We further observe that each question formhas a distinct ‘bias profile’, indicating a certain combination of prior expectations andcontextual evidence. Besides these empirical findings, our study also makes a methodologicalcontribution: our experimental design could be used in future work to identifypolar question forms with different bias profiles in sign languages other than NGT, aswell as visual cues accompanying polar questions with different bias profiles in spokenlanguages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Indexicals under role shift in Sign Language of the Netherlands Inherently reciprocal verbs in Brazilian Sign Language The relationship between place of articulation and semantic features in a corpus of astronomical neologisms in Quebec Sign Language Some properties of neg-raising in three sign languages Manual and nonmanual cues used for the prosodic encoding of contrastive focus in LSFB (French Belgian Sign Language)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1