{"title":"荷兰手语的偏极性问题表(NGT)","authors":"M. Oomen, F. Roelofsen","doi":"10.31009/feast.i5.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We identify several polar question forms in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT)through a production experiment in which we manipulate two types of biases: (i) theprior expectations of the person asking the question, and (ii) the evidence available inthe immediate context of utterance. Our analysis in the present paper focuses on formsinvolving headshake. We find that in some cases headshake expresses negation, as expected,but in other cases it fulfils another function, namely, it is part of a sentence-finalphrase either expressing uncertainty or signalling a request for a response from the addressee,or possibly both at the same time. We further observe that each question formhas a distinct ‘bias profile’, indicating a certain combination of prior expectations andcontextual evidence. Besides these empirical findings, our study also makes a methodologicalcontribution: our experimental design could be used in future work to identifypolar question forms with different bias profiles in sign languages other than NGT, aswell as visual cues accompanying polar questions with different bias profiles in spokenlanguages.","PeriodicalId":164096,"journal":{"name":"FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign language Theory","volume":"4 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biased polar question forms in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT)\",\"authors\":\"M. Oomen, F. Roelofsen\",\"doi\":\"10.31009/feast.i5.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We identify several polar question forms in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT)through a production experiment in which we manipulate two types of biases: (i) theprior expectations of the person asking the question, and (ii) the evidence available inthe immediate context of utterance. Our analysis in the present paper focuses on formsinvolving headshake. We find that in some cases headshake expresses negation, as expected,but in other cases it fulfils another function, namely, it is part of a sentence-finalphrase either expressing uncertainty or signalling a request for a response from the addressee,or possibly both at the same time. We further observe that each question formhas a distinct ‘bias profile’, indicating a certain combination of prior expectations andcontextual evidence. Besides these empirical findings, our study also makes a methodologicalcontribution: our experimental design could be used in future work to identifypolar question forms with different bias profiles in sign languages other than NGT, aswell as visual cues accompanying polar questions with different bias profiles in spokenlanguages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign language Theory\",\"volume\":\"4 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign language Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31009/feast.i5.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign language Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31009/feast.i5.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们通过一个制作实验确定了荷兰手语(NGT)中的几种极性提问形式,在这个实验中,我们操纵了两种类型的偏差:(i) 提问者之前的期望,以及 (ii) 语篇的直接语境中可用的证据。本文的分析重点是涉及摇头的形式。我们发现,在某些情况下,摇头表示否定,正如预期的那样,但在另一些情况下,摇头却有另一种功能,即它是句末短语的一部分,要么表示不确定性,要么表示要求被问者做出回应,或者可能同时表示这两种功能。我们进一步观察到,每种提问形式都有独特的 "偏差特征",表明了先前预期和语境证据的某种结合。除了这些实证研究结果之外,我们的研究还在方法论上做出了贡献:我们的实验设计可以在未来的工作中用于识别 NGT 以外的其他手语中具有不同偏向特征的极性提问形式,以及口语中具有不同偏向特征的极性提问所伴随的视觉线索。
Biased polar question forms in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT)
We identify several polar question forms in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT)through a production experiment in which we manipulate two types of biases: (i) theprior expectations of the person asking the question, and (ii) the evidence available inthe immediate context of utterance. Our analysis in the present paper focuses on formsinvolving headshake. We find that in some cases headshake expresses negation, as expected,but in other cases it fulfils another function, namely, it is part of a sentence-finalphrase either expressing uncertainty or signalling a request for a response from the addressee,or possibly both at the same time. We further observe that each question formhas a distinct ‘bias profile’, indicating a certain combination of prior expectations andcontextual evidence. Besides these empirical findings, our study also makes a methodologicalcontribution: our experimental design could be used in future work to identifypolar question forms with different bias profiles in sign languages other than NGT, aswell as visual cues accompanying polar questions with different bias profiles in spokenlanguages.