{"title":"资优和天才学生成绩不佳研究:类型和影响","authors":"","doi":"10.55057/ijares.2023.5.4.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine the existence of low-performance issues or underachievers (UA) among gifted and talented students. Specifically, the study identified the type of UA that dominates in the sample group studied. This survey involved 63 students from GENIUS@Pintar Negara College, UKM answering the UA instrument built by the researcher. The value of the UA instrument's reliability correlation coefficient for all 60 items is ᾳ=0.87. Data were analyzed descriptively using SPSS software and ANNOVA inferential statistics to answer the research questions. The results show that the overall value of low-performing students at Kolej GENIUS@Pintar Negara is moderate (mean = 3.22, SP = 0.126). From the six types of UA, it was found that the category of low-performing intelligent students, Type 6, Autonomous UA Students, obtained the highest mean, followed by Type 3, Underground UA, and Type 5, Twice-Multiple Exceptional. There is no significant difference among UA students regarding gender, race, and level. The findings of this study give implications about the importance of providing a comprehensive intervention program for gifted UA students by involving several roles including UA students, academic management, counselling management, and parents to empower the development of gifted UA students' talents to an optimal level.","PeriodicalId":426882,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society","volume":"411 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Underachiever Studies of Gifted and Talented Students: Types and Implications\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.55057/ijares.2023.5.4.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to examine the existence of low-performance issues or underachievers (UA) among gifted and talented students. Specifically, the study identified the type of UA that dominates in the sample group studied. This survey involved 63 students from GENIUS@Pintar Negara College, UKM answering the UA instrument built by the researcher. The value of the UA instrument's reliability correlation coefficient for all 60 items is ᾳ=0.87. Data were analyzed descriptively using SPSS software and ANNOVA inferential statistics to answer the research questions. The results show that the overall value of low-performing students at Kolej GENIUS@Pintar Negara is moderate (mean = 3.22, SP = 0.126). From the six types of UA, it was found that the category of low-performing intelligent students, Type 6, Autonomous UA Students, obtained the highest mean, followed by Type 3, Underground UA, and Type 5, Twice-Multiple Exceptional. There is no significant difference among UA students regarding gender, race, and level. The findings of this study give implications about the importance of providing a comprehensive intervention program for gifted UA students by involving several roles including UA students, academic management, counselling management, and parents to empower the development of gifted UA students' talents to an optimal level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society\",\"volume\":\"411 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55057/ijares.2023.5.4.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55057/ijares.2023.5.4.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在探讨资优学生中存在的低表现问题或成绩不佳者(UA)。具体而言,本研究确定了在所研究的样本群体中占主导地位的 UA 类型。这项调查涉及英国国立自治大学GENIUS@Pintar Negara学院的63名学生,他们回答了研究人员制作的UA问卷。所有 60 个项目的问卷信度相关系数均为ᾳ=0.87。为回答研究问题,研究人员使用 SPSS 软件对数据进行了描述性分析,并使用方差分析(ANNOVA)进行了推理统计。结果显示,在 Kolej GENIUS@Pintar Negara,成绩差的学生的整体价值处于中等水平(平均值 = 3.22,SP = 0.126)。从六种类型的 UA 中可以发现,成绩较差的智能型学生中,第 6 类 "自主型 UA 学生 "的平均值最高,其次是第 3 类 "地下型 UA "和第 5 类 "双重-多重异常型 UA"。UA 学生在性别、种族和水平方面没有明显差异。这项研究的结果启示我们,必须为资优未完成学业学生提供全面的干预计划,让包括未完成学业学生、学业管理、辅导管理和家长在内的多个角色参与其中,以增强资优未完成学业学生的能力,使他们的才能发展到最佳水平。
Underachiever Studies of Gifted and Talented Students: Types and Implications
This study aims to examine the existence of low-performance issues or underachievers (UA) among gifted and talented students. Specifically, the study identified the type of UA that dominates in the sample group studied. This survey involved 63 students from GENIUS@Pintar Negara College, UKM answering the UA instrument built by the researcher. The value of the UA instrument's reliability correlation coefficient for all 60 items is ᾳ=0.87. Data were analyzed descriptively using SPSS software and ANNOVA inferential statistics to answer the research questions. The results show that the overall value of low-performing students at Kolej GENIUS@Pintar Negara is moderate (mean = 3.22, SP = 0.126). From the six types of UA, it was found that the category of low-performing intelligent students, Type 6, Autonomous UA Students, obtained the highest mean, followed by Type 3, Underground UA, and Type 5, Twice-Multiple Exceptional. There is no significant difference among UA students regarding gender, race, and level. The findings of this study give implications about the importance of providing a comprehensive intervention program for gifted UA students by involving several roles including UA students, academic management, counselling management, and parents to empower the development of gifted UA students' talents to an optimal level.