{"title":"从血液培养物中分离出致病性革兰氏阳性杆菌与共生革兰氏阳性杆菌的患者预测因素","authors":"Arjun Sharma, M. Elligsen, Nick Daneman, P. Lam","doi":"10.1017/ash.2023.506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: Gram-positive bacilli represent a diverse species of bacteria that range from commensal flora to pathogens implicated in severe and life-threatening infection. Following the isolation of Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures, the time to species identification may take upward of 24 hours, leaving clinicians to conjecture whether they may represent a contaminant (inadvertent inoculation of commensal flora) or pathogenic organism. In this study, we sought to identify patient variables that could help predict the isolation of contaminant versus pathogenic Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Settings: One quaternary academic medical center affiliated with the University of Toronto. Patients: Adult inpatients were admitted to hospital over a 5-year period (May 2014 to December 2019). Methods: A total of 260 unique Gram-positive bacilli blood culture results from adult inpatients were reviewed and analyzed in both a univariable and multivariable model. Results: Malignancy (aOR 2.78, 95% CI 1.33–5.91, p = 0.007), point increments in the Quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment score for sepsis (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.50–3.47, p < 0.001), peptic ulcer disease (aOR 5.63, 95% CI 1.43–21.0, p = 0.01), and the receipt of immunosuppression prior to a blood culture draw (aOR 3.80, 95% CI 1.86–8.01, p < 0.001) were associated with an increased likelihood of speciating pathogenic Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures such as Clostridium species and Listeria monocytogenes. Conclusion: Such predictors can help supplement a clinician’s assessment on determining when empirical therapy is indicated when faced with Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures and may direct future stewardship interventions for responsible antimicrobial prescribing.","PeriodicalId":7953,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","volume":" 71","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient predictors of pathogenic versus commensal Gram-positive bacilli organisms isolated from blood cultures\",\"authors\":\"Arjun Sharma, M. Elligsen, Nick Daneman, P. Lam\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ash.2023.506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective: Gram-positive bacilli represent a diverse species of bacteria that range from commensal flora to pathogens implicated in severe and life-threatening infection. Following the isolation of Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures, the time to species identification may take upward of 24 hours, leaving clinicians to conjecture whether they may represent a contaminant (inadvertent inoculation of commensal flora) or pathogenic organism. In this study, we sought to identify patient variables that could help predict the isolation of contaminant versus pathogenic Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Settings: One quaternary academic medical center affiliated with the University of Toronto. Patients: Adult inpatients were admitted to hospital over a 5-year period (May 2014 to December 2019). Methods: A total of 260 unique Gram-positive bacilli blood culture results from adult inpatients were reviewed and analyzed in both a univariable and multivariable model. Results: Malignancy (aOR 2.78, 95% CI 1.33–5.91, p = 0.007), point increments in the Quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment score for sepsis (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.50–3.47, p < 0.001), peptic ulcer disease (aOR 5.63, 95% CI 1.43–21.0, p = 0.01), and the receipt of immunosuppression prior to a blood culture draw (aOR 3.80, 95% CI 1.86–8.01, p < 0.001) were associated with an increased likelihood of speciating pathogenic Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures such as Clostridium species and Listeria monocytogenes. Conclusion: Such predictors can help supplement a clinician’s assessment on determining when empirical therapy is indicated when faced with Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures and may direct future stewardship interventions for responsible antimicrobial prescribing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" 71\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要 目的:革兰氏阳性杆菌是细菌中的一种,其种类繁多,既有普通菌群,也有导致严重感染和危及生命的病原体。从血液培养物中分离出革兰氏阳性杆菌后,需要 24 小时才能鉴定出其种类,这让临床医生不得不猜测它们是污染物(不慎接种的共生菌群)还是病原体。在本研究中,我们试图找出有助于预测从血液培养物中分离出污染菌还是致病性革兰氏阳性杆菌的患者变量。设计:回顾性队列研究。研究地点多伦多大学下属的一家四级学术医疗中心。患者:成人住院患者,住院时间为 5 年(2014 年 5 月至 2019 年 12 月)。研究方法通过单变量和多变量模型,对成人住院患者的260份独特革兰氏阳性杆菌血液培养结果进行回顾和分析。结果恶性肿瘤(aOR 2.78,95% CI 1.33-5.91,p = 0.007)、脓毒症快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估评分增量(aOR 2.25,95% CI 1.50-3.47,p < 0.001)、消化性溃疡病(aOR 5.63,95% CI 1.43-21.0,p = 0.01)和抽血培养前接受免疫抑制(aOR 3.80,95% CI 1.86-8.01,p < 0.001)与从血液培养物中检出致病性革兰氏阳性杆菌(如梭菌和李斯特菌)的可能性增加有关。结论:这些预测因素有助于临床医生在面对血培养物中的革兰氏阳性杆菌时,对何时需要进行经验性治疗的评估进行补充,并可指导未来对负责任的抗菌药物处方进行管理干预。
Patient predictors of pathogenic versus commensal Gram-positive bacilli organisms isolated from blood cultures
Abstract Objective: Gram-positive bacilli represent a diverse species of bacteria that range from commensal flora to pathogens implicated in severe and life-threatening infection. Following the isolation of Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures, the time to species identification may take upward of 24 hours, leaving clinicians to conjecture whether they may represent a contaminant (inadvertent inoculation of commensal flora) or pathogenic organism. In this study, we sought to identify patient variables that could help predict the isolation of contaminant versus pathogenic Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Settings: One quaternary academic medical center affiliated with the University of Toronto. Patients: Adult inpatients were admitted to hospital over a 5-year period (May 2014 to December 2019). Methods: A total of 260 unique Gram-positive bacilli blood culture results from adult inpatients were reviewed and analyzed in both a univariable and multivariable model. Results: Malignancy (aOR 2.78, 95% CI 1.33–5.91, p = 0.007), point increments in the Quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment score for sepsis (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.50–3.47, p < 0.001), peptic ulcer disease (aOR 5.63, 95% CI 1.43–21.0, p = 0.01), and the receipt of immunosuppression prior to a blood culture draw (aOR 3.80, 95% CI 1.86–8.01, p < 0.001) were associated with an increased likelihood of speciating pathogenic Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures such as Clostridium species and Listeria monocytogenes. Conclusion: Such predictors can help supplement a clinician’s assessment on determining when empirical therapy is indicated when faced with Gram-positive bacilli from blood cultures and may direct future stewardship interventions for responsible antimicrobial prescribing.