英语语言学习者的动机特征:以人为本,发现性别差异

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1177/13621688231213030
Jiajing Li, Ronnel B. King, Chuang Wang
{"title":"英语语言学习者的动机特征:以人为本,发现性别差异","authors":"Jiajing Li, Ronnel B. King, Chuang Wang","doi":"10.1177/13621688231213030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Past studies have shown gender differences among English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. However, most of these studies have focused on mean-level differences using variable-centered analyses. Studies have seldom explored similarities and differences in motivational profiles using person-centered approaches. To bridge this gap, we examined the motivational profiles of boys and girls and explored how these profiles were associated with basic psychological needs support, and academic achievement. A total of 582 Chinese EFL learners participated in the study. Profiles were created based on students’ scores on autonomous and controlled motivation. Results indicated that four distinct profiles emerged for both boys and girls: ‘low quantity motivation’ (low autonomous and controlled motivation), ‘poor quality motivation’ (low autonomous but high controlled motivation), ‘moderate motivation’ (moderate autonomous and controlled motivation), and ‘high quantity motivation’ (high autonomous and controlled motivation) EFL learners. Specifically, the ‘moderate motivation’ group had different levels of autonomous and controlled motivation, with boys exhibiting a higher controlled motivation and girls scoring higher in autonomous motivation. There was also a higher prevalence of ‘poor quality’ motivation among boys. Predictors of profile membership varied across genders. Competence was a stronger predictor of profile membership for boys but autonomy and relatedness were stronger predictors for girls. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motivational profiles of EFL learners: A person-centered approach to uncovering gender differences\",\"authors\":\"Jiajing Li, Ronnel B. King, Chuang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13621688231213030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Past studies have shown gender differences among English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. However, most of these studies have focused on mean-level differences using variable-centered analyses. Studies have seldom explored similarities and differences in motivational profiles using person-centered approaches. To bridge this gap, we examined the motivational profiles of boys and girls and explored how these profiles were associated with basic psychological needs support, and academic achievement. A total of 582 Chinese EFL learners participated in the study. Profiles were created based on students’ scores on autonomous and controlled motivation. Results indicated that four distinct profiles emerged for both boys and girls: ‘low quantity motivation’ (low autonomous and controlled motivation), ‘poor quality motivation’ (low autonomous but high controlled motivation), ‘moderate motivation’ (moderate autonomous and controlled motivation), and ‘high quantity motivation’ (high autonomous and controlled motivation) EFL learners. Specifically, the ‘moderate motivation’ group had different levels of autonomous and controlled motivation, with boys exhibiting a higher controlled motivation and girls scoring higher in autonomous motivation. There was also a higher prevalence of ‘poor quality’ motivation among boys. Predictors of profile membership varied across genders. Competence was a stronger predictor of profile membership for boys but autonomy and relatedness were stronger predictors for girls. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231213030\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231213030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去的研究表明,英语作为外语(EFL)学习者之间存在性别差异。然而,这些研究大多侧重于以变量为中心的平均水平差异分析。很少有研究采用以人为中心的方法来探讨动机特征的异同。为了弥补这一不足,我们研究了男生和女生的学习动机特征,并探讨了这些特征与基本心理需求支持和学习成绩之间的关联。共有 582 名中国 EFL 学习者参与了这项研究。根据学生在自主动机和受控动机方面的得分建立了他们的动机档案。结果表明,男生和女生都出现了四种不同的特征:"低数量动机"(低自主和控制动机)、"低质量动机"(低自主但高控制动机)、"中等动机"(中等自主和控制动机)和 "高数量动机"(高自主和控制动机)。具体来说,"中等动机 "组的自主动机和受控动机水平不同,男生的受控动机较高,而女生的自主动机得分较高。男生中 "劣质 "动机的比例也较高。不同性别的学生在预测是否加入档案方面也有所不同。对男生来说,能力是更强的预测因素,而对女生来说,自主性和相关性是更强的预测因素。本文讨论了其理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Motivational profiles of EFL learners: A person-centered approach to uncovering gender differences
Past studies have shown gender differences among English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. However, most of these studies have focused on mean-level differences using variable-centered analyses. Studies have seldom explored similarities and differences in motivational profiles using person-centered approaches. To bridge this gap, we examined the motivational profiles of boys and girls and explored how these profiles were associated with basic psychological needs support, and academic achievement. A total of 582 Chinese EFL learners participated in the study. Profiles were created based on students’ scores on autonomous and controlled motivation. Results indicated that four distinct profiles emerged for both boys and girls: ‘low quantity motivation’ (low autonomous and controlled motivation), ‘poor quality motivation’ (low autonomous but high controlled motivation), ‘moderate motivation’ (moderate autonomous and controlled motivation), and ‘high quantity motivation’ (high autonomous and controlled motivation) EFL learners. Specifically, the ‘moderate motivation’ group had different levels of autonomous and controlled motivation, with boys exhibiting a higher controlled motivation and girls scoring higher in autonomous motivation. There was also a higher prevalence of ‘poor quality’ motivation among boys. Predictors of profile membership varied across genders. Competence was a stronger predictor of profile membership for boys but autonomy and relatedness were stronger predictors for girls. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1