误传还是故意欺骗?19 个国家的公民对俄罗斯乌克兰战争的错误和虚假信息的看法

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE European Journal of Political Research Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1111/1475-6765.12646
MICHAEL HAMELEERS, MARINA TULIN, CLAES DE VREESE, TORIL AALBERG, PETER VAN AELST, ANA SOFIA CARDENAL, NICOLETA CORBU, PATRICK VAN ERKEL, FRANK ESSER, LUISA GEHLE, DENIS HALAGIERA, DAVID HOPMANN, KAROLINA KOC-MICHALSKA, JÖRG MATTHES, CHRISTINE MELTZER, SABINA MIHELJ, CHRISTIAN SCHEMER, TAMIR SHEAFER, SERGIO SPLENDORE, JAMES STANYR, AGNIESZKA STEPINSKA, VACLAV STETKA, JESPER STRÖMBÄCK, LUDOVIC TERREN, YANNIS THEOCHARIS, ALON ZOIZNER
{"title":"误传还是故意欺骗?19 个国家的公民对俄罗斯乌克兰战争的错误和虚假信息的看法","authors":"MICHAEL HAMELEERS,&nbsp;MARINA TULIN,&nbsp;CLAES DE VREESE,&nbsp;TORIL AALBERG,&nbsp;PETER VAN AELST,&nbsp;ANA SOFIA CARDENAL,&nbsp;NICOLETA CORBU,&nbsp;PATRICK VAN ERKEL,&nbsp;FRANK ESSER,&nbsp;LUISA GEHLE,&nbsp;DENIS HALAGIERA,&nbsp;DAVID HOPMANN,&nbsp;KAROLINA KOC-MICHALSKA,&nbsp;JÖRG MATTHES,&nbsp;CHRISTINE MELTZER,&nbsp;SABINA MIHELJ,&nbsp;CHRISTIAN SCHEMER,&nbsp;TAMIR SHEAFER,&nbsp;SERGIO SPLENDORE,&nbsp;JAMES STANYR,&nbsp;AGNIESZKA STEPINSKA,&nbsp;VACLAV STETKA,&nbsp;JESPER STRÖMBÄCK,&nbsp;LUDOVIC TERREN,&nbsp;YANNIS THEOCHARIS,&nbsp;ALON ZOIZNER","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.12646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In information environments characterized by institutional distrust, fragmentation and the widespread dissemination of conspiracies and disinformation, citizens perceive misinformation as a salient and threatening issue. Especially amidst disruptive events and crises, news users are likely to believe that information is inaccurate or deceptive. Using an original 19-country comparative survey study across diverse regions in the world (N = 19,037), we find that news users are likely to regard information on the Russian war in Ukraine as false. They are more likely to attribute false information to deliberative deception than to a lack of access to the war area or inaccurate expert knowledge. Russian sources are substantially more likely to be blamed for falsehoods than Ukrainian or Western sources – but these attribution biases depend on a country's position on the war. Our findings reveal that people mostly believe that falsehoods are intended to deceive them, and selectively associate misinformation with the opposed camp.</p>","PeriodicalId":48273,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Research","volume":"63 4","pages":"1642-1654"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6765.12646","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mistakenly misinformed or intentionally deceived? Mis- and Disinformation perceptions on the Russian War in Ukraine among citizens in 19 countries\",\"authors\":\"MICHAEL HAMELEERS,&nbsp;MARINA TULIN,&nbsp;CLAES DE VREESE,&nbsp;TORIL AALBERG,&nbsp;PETER VAN AELST,&nbsp;ANA SOFIA CARDENAL,&nbsp;NICOLETA CORBU,&nbsp;PATRICK VAN ERKEL,&nbsp;FRANK ESSER,&nbsp;LUISA GEHLE,&nbsp;DENIS HALAGIERA,&nbsp;DAVID HOPMANN,&nbsp;KAROLINA KOC-MICHALSKA,&nbsp;JÖRG MATTHES,&nbsp;CHRISTINE MELTZER,&nbsp;SABINA MIHELJ,&nbsp;CHRISTIAN SCHEMER,&nbsp;TAMIR SHEAFER,&nbsp;SERGIO SPLENDORE,&nbsp;JAMES STANYR,&nbsp;AGNIESZKA STEPINSKA,&nbsp;VACLAV STETKA,&nbsp;JESPER STRÖMBÄCK,&nbsp;LUDOVIC TERREN,&nbsp;YANNIS THEOCHARIS,&nbsp;ALON ZOIZNER\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6765.12646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In information environments characterized by institutional distrust, fragmentation and the widespread dissemination of conspiracies and disinformation, citizens perceive misinformation as a salient and threatening issue. Especially amidst disruptive events and crises, news users are likely to believe that information is inaccurate or deceptive. Using an original 19-country comparative survey study across diverse regions in the world (N = 19,037), we find that news users are likely to regard information on the Russian war in Ukraine as false. They are more likely to attribute false information to deliberative deception than to a lack of access to the war area or inaccurate expert knowledge. Russian sources are substantially more likely to be blamed for falsehoods than Ukrainian or Western sources – but these attribution biases depend on a country's position on the war. Our findings reveal that people mostly believe that falsehoods are intended to deceive them, and selectively associate misinformation with the opposed camp.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Political Research\",\"volume\":\"63 4\",\"pages\":\"1642-1654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6765.12646\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Political Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12646\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12646","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在以机构不信任、碎片化以及阴谋和虚假信息广泛传播为特征的信息环境中,公民认为虚假信息是一个突出且具有威胁性的问题。尤其是在破坏性事件和危机中,新闻用户很可能认为信息不准确或具有欺骗性。通过对全球不同地区 19 个国家的原创比较调查研究(N = 19,037),我们发现新闻用户很可能认为有关俄罗斯乌克兰战争的信息是虚假的。他们更倾向于将虚假信息归因于蓄意欺骗,而非缺乏进入战区的途径或专家知识不准确。与乌克兰或西方消息来源相比,俄罗斯消息来源更有可能被指责为虚假信息--但这些归因偏差取决于一个国家对战争的立场。我们的研究结果表明,人们大多认为虚假信息是为了欺骗他们,并选择性地将错误信息与反对阵营联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mistakenly misinformed or intentionally deceived? Mis- and Disinformation perceptions on the Russian War in Ukraine among citizens in 19 countries

In information environments characterized by institutional distrust, fragmentation and the widespread dissemination of conspiracies and disinformation, citizens perceive misinformation as a salient and threatening issue. Especially amidst disruptive events and crises, news users are likely to believe that information is inaccurate or deceptive. Using an original 19-country comparative survey study across diverse regions in the world (N = 19,037), we find that news users are likely to regard information on the Russian war in Ukraine as false. They are more likely to attribute false information to deliberative deception than to a lack of access to the war area or inaccurate expert knowledge. Russian sources are substantially more likely to be blamed for falsehoods than Ukrainian or Western sources – but these attribution biases depend on a country's position on the war. Our findings reveal that people mostly believe that falsehoods are intended to deceive them, and selectively associate misinformation with the opposed camp.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: European Journal of Political Research specialises in articles articulating theoretical and comparative perspectives in political science, and welcomes both quantitative and qualitative approaches. EJPR also publishes short research notes outlining ongoing research in more specific areas of research. The Journal includes the Political Data Yearbook, published as a double issue at the end of each volume.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Correction to (When) do electoral mandates set the agenda? Government capacity and mandate responsiveness in Germany Issue Information Patterns of democracy and democratic satisfaction: Results from a comparative conjoint experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1