{"title":"健康概念化","authors":"Penelope Scott","doi":"10.1075/ijolc.19018.sco","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The word ‘health’ is highly polysemous, and many attempts have been made to define its meaning in terms of actual\n use and to create a workable and even universal concept of health (Balog\n 1978; Boruchovitch & Mednick 2002). However, though the meaning of ‘health’\n has been debated extensively, as well as the metaphorical conceptualizations of illness (e.g., Sontag 1978), there has been little treatment of how health is metaphorically conceptualized. This article\n investigates the meaning of the word ‘health’ in the United States and the United Kingdom, through a search on websites based on\n an examination of concordances in the Corpus of Global Web-Based English (GloWbE). It focuses on the senses\n emerging from metaphorical cultural conceptualizations. Recent developments in Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Kövecses 2005; Yu 2009) and Cultural Linguistics (Palmer 1996; Sharifian 2011) have increased\n the focus on the interaction between cognition and culture. I present an analysis of the conceptual metaphors, proposition\n schemas, and image schemas that converge to form a cultural model for health within these speech communities revealing,\n for example, that one model sees health in terms of a manageable valuable commodity, which may contribute to health\n behaviors such as self-tracking and observation, as discussed by Lupton (2016).","PeriodicalId":37349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language and Culture","volume":"20 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualizing health\",\"authors\":\"Penelope Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ijolc.19018.sco\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The word ‘health’ is highly polysemous, and many attempts have been made to define its meaning in terms of actual\\n use and to create a workable and even universal concept of health (Balog\\n 1978; Boruchovitch & Mednick 2002). However, though the meaning of ‘health’\\n has been debated extensively, as well as the metaphorical conceptualizations of illness (e.g., Sontag 1978), there has been little treatment of how health is metaphorically conceptualized. This article\\n investigates the meaning of the word ‘health’ in the United States and the United Kingdom, through a search on websites based on\\n an examination of concordances in the Corpus of Global Web-Based English (GloWbE). It focuses on the senses\\n emerging from metaphorical cultural conceptualizations. Recent developments in Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Kövecses 2005; Yu 2009) and Cultural Linguistics (Palmer 1996; Sharifian 2011) have increased\\n the focus on the interaction between cognition and culture. I present an analysis of the conceptual metaphors, proposition\\n schemas, and image schemas that converge to form a cultural model for health within these speech communities revealing,\\n for example, that one model sees health in terms of a manageable valuable commodity, which may contribute to health\\n behaviors such as self-tracking and observation, as discussed by Lupton (2016).\",\"PeriodicalId\":37349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Language and Culture\",\"volume\":\"20 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Language and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.19018.sco\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.19018.sco","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
The word ‘health’ is highly polysemous, and many attempts have been made to define its meaning in terms of actual
use and to create a workable and even universal concept of health (Balog
1978; Boruchovitch & Mednick 2002). However, though the meaning of ‘health’
has been debated extensively, as well as the metaphorical conceptualizations of illness (e.g., Sontag 1978), there has been little treatment of how health is metaphorically conceptualized. This article
investigates the meaning of the word ‘health’ in the United States and the United Kingdom, through a search on websites based on
an examination of concordances in the Corpus of Global Web-Based English (GloWbE). It focuses on the senses
emerging from metaphorical cultural conceptualizations. Recent developments in Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Kövecses 2005; Yu 2009) and Cultural Linguistics (Palmer 1996; Sharifian 2011) have increased
the focus on the interaction between cognition and culture. I present an analysis of the conceptual metaphors, proposition
schemas, and image schemas that converge to form a cultural model for health within these speech communities revealing,
for example, that one model sees health in terms of a manageable valuable commodity, which may contribute to health
behaviors such as self-tracking and observation, as discussed by Lupton (2016).
期刊介绍:
The aim of the International Journal of Language and Culture (IJoLC) is to disseminate cutting-edge research that explores the interrelationship between language and culture. The journal is multidisciplinary in scope and seeks to provide a forum for researchers interested in the interaction between language and culture across several disciplines, including linguistics, anthropology, applied linguistics, psychology and cognitive science. The journal publishes high-quality, original and state-of-the-art articles that may be theoretical or empirical in orientation and that advance our understanding of the intricate relationship between language and culture. IJoLC is a peer-reviewed journal published twice a year. Topics of interest to IJoLC include, but are not limited to the following: a. Culture and the structure of language, b. Language, culture, and conceptualisation, c. Language, culture, and politeness, d. Language, culture, and emotion, e. Culture and language development, f. Language, culture, and communication.