Roxanne Alvarado-Torres, Melissa Dunn Silesky, Sheena Helgenberger, Aja Anderson, Claudia Granillo, Ty Nared, Erika Bonnevie
{"title":"对减少心理健康污名化的数字媒体活动进行评估","authors":"Roxanne Alvarado-Torres, Melissa Dunn Silesky, Sheena Helgenberger, Aja Anderson, Claudia Granillo, Ty Nared, Erika Bonnevie","doi":"10.1177/00178969231215761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"WhatMakesUs is a digital media campaign aimed at reducing mental health stigma in the Greater Omaha-Council Bluffs metropolitan area. This study evaluated the campaign’s impact at the end of the second year of the campaign by examining different aspects of mental health stigma, including social distance, attitudes, behaviours and self-efficacy, among campaign-aware (CA) individuals and non-campaign-aware (NCA) individuals. The study also explored the campaign’s feasibility and potential for adaptation to other parts of the USA. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in the campaign’s implementation area. Respondents were recruited through a panel recruiting company using non-probabilistic methods. Digital metrics from the campaign’s social media accounts and website were collected and analysed using Google Analytics. CA respondents exhibited lower social distance and stigmatising attitudes and beliefs, and more positive behaviours and self-efficacy towards people with mental health conditions (MHCs) compared to NCA respondents. A significantly higher proportion of CA respondents reported living with ( p = .001), working with ( p = .005), and having close friendships with individuals with MHCs ( p = .043). CA respondents found therapy and counselling effective treatments for MHCs ( p = .005), greater comfort in providing support to individuals with MHCs ( p < .001), pursued steps to improve their own mental health ( p = .032) and perceived their workplaces taking an active role in their mental health ( p = .029), when compared to NCA respondents. Digital metrics indicated successful engagement with the campaign’s intended audience. Findings highlight the impact of digital campaigns in addressing the stigmatisation of MHCs and provide valuable insights for future campaigns.","PeriodicalId":47346,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Journal","volume":"60 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a digital media campaign for reducing mental health stigma\",\"authors\":\"Roxanne Alvarado-Torres, Melissa Dunn Silesky, Sheena Helgenberger, Aja Anderson, Claudia Granillo, Ty Nared, Erika Bonnevie\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00178969231215761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"WhatMakesUs is a digital media campaign aimed at reducing mental health stigma in the Greater Omaha-Council Bluffs metropolitan area. This study evaluated the campaign’s impact at the end of the second year of the campaign by examining different aspects of mental health stigma, including social distance, attitudes, behaviours and self-efficacy, among campaign-aware (CA) individuals and non-campaign-aware (NCA) individuals. The study also explored the campaign’s feasibility and potential for adaptation to other parts of the USA. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in the campaign’s implementation area. Respondents were recruited through a panel recruiting company using non-probabilistic methods. Digital metrics from the campaign’s social media accounts and website were collected and analysed using Google Analytics. CA respondents exhibited lower social distance and stigmatising attitudes and beliefs, and more positive behaviours and self-efficacy towards people with mental health conditions (MHCs) compared to NCA respondents. A significantly higher proportion of CA respondents reported living with ( p = .001), working with ( p = .005), and having close friendships with individuals with MHCs ( p = .043). CA respondents found therapy and counselling effective treatments for MHCs ( p = .005), greater comfort in providing support to individuals with MHCs ( p < .001), pursued steps to improve their own mental health ( p = .032) and perceived their workplaces taking an active role in their mental health ( p = .029), when compared to NCA respondents. Digital metrics indicated successful engagement with the campaign’s intended audience. Findings highlight the impact of digital campaigns in addressing the stigmatisation of MHCs and provide valuable insights for future campaigns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Education Journal\",\"volume\":\"60 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Education Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969231215761\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969231215761","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
WhatMakesUs 是一项数字媒体活动,旨在减少大奥马哈-匡恩布拉夫斯都会区的心理健康耻辱感。本研究通过考察心理健康污名化的不同方面,包括社会距离、态度、行为和自我效能,评估了该活动在第二年年底的影响。该研究还探讨了该运动在美国其他地区的可行性和适应潜力。在该运动的实施地区开展了一项横向在线调查。受访者是通过一家小组招聘公司采用非概率方法招募的。使用 Google Analytics 收集并分析了活动社交媒体账户和网站的数字指标。与 NCA 受访者相比,CA 受访者对精神疾病患者(MHCs)表现出更低的社会距离、轻蔑态度和信念,以及更积极的行为和自我效能。据报告,与精神疾病患者一起生活(p = .001)、一起工作(p = .005)和拥有亲密友谊(p = .043)的 CA 受访者比例明显更高。与 NCA 受访者相比,CA 受访者认为治疗和咨询是治疗多发性硬化症的有效方法 ( p = .005),在为多发性硬化症患者提供支持时更加得心应手 ( p < .001),采取步骤改善自己的心理健康 ( p = .032),并认为其工作单位在其心理健康方面发挥了积极作用 ( p = .029)。数字指标表明,活动成功地吸引了目标受众。研究结果凸显了数字活动在解决精神健康问题污名化方面的影响,并为未来的活动提供了宝贵的见解。
Evaluation of a digital media campaign for reducing mental health stigma
WhatMakesUs is a digital media campaign aimed at reducing mental health stigma in the Greater Omaha-Council Bluffs metropolitan area. This study evaluated the campaign’s impact at the end of the second year of the campaign by examining different aspects of mental health stigma, including social distance, attitudes, behaviours and self-efficacy, among campaign-aware (CA) individuals and non-campaign-aware (NCA) individuals. The study also explored the campaign’s feasibility and potential for adaptation to other parts of the USA. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in the campaign’s implementation area. Respondents were recruited through a panel recruiting company using non-probabilistic methods. Digital metrics from the campaign’s social media accounts and website were collected and analysed using Google Analytics. CA respondents exhibited lower social distance and stigmatising attitudes and beliefs, and more positive behaviours and self-efficacy towards people with mental health conditions (MHCs) compared to NCA respondents. A significantly higher proportion of CA respondents reported living with ( p = .001), working with ( p = .005), and having close friendships with individuals with MHCs ( p = .043). CA respondents found therapy and counselling effective treatments for MHCs ( p = .005), greater comfort in providing support to individuals with MHCs ( p < .001), pursued steps to improve their own mental health ( p = .032) and perceived their workplaces taking an active role in their mental health ( p = .029), when compared to NCA respondents. Digital metrics indicated successful engagement with the campaign’s intended audience. Findings highlight the impact of digital campaigns in addressing the stigmatisation of MHCs and provide valuable insights for future campaigns.
期刊介绍:
Health Education Journal is a leading peer reviewed journal established in 1943. It carries original papers on health promotion and education research, policy development and good practice.