体弱对使用 COVID-19 的重症监护室住院患者出院后长期存活率的影响

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care and Resuscitation Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.11.001
Ashwin Subramaniam MBBS MMed FRACP FCICM PhD , Ryan Ruiyang Ling Dr MBBS , David Pilcher MBBS MRCP(UK) FRACP FCICM
{"title":"体弱对使用 COVID-19 的重症监护室住院患者出院后长期存活率的影响","authors":"Ashwin Subramaniam MBBS MMed FRACP FCICM PhD ,&nbsp;Ryan Ruiyang Ling Dr MBBS ,&nbsp;David Pilcher MBBS MRCP(UK) FRACP FCICM","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3><strong>Objective</strong></h3><p>Though frailty is associated with mortality, its impact on long-term survival after an ICU admission with COVID-19 is unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between frailty and long-term survival in patients after an ICU admission with COVID-19.</p></div><div><h3><strong>Design, Setting and Participants</strong></h3><p>This registry-based multicentre, retrospective, cohort study included all patients ≥16 years discharged alive from the hospital following an ICU admission with COVID-19 and documented clinical frailty scale (CFS). Data from 118 ICUs between 01/01/2020 through 31/12/2020 in New Zealand and 31/12/2021 in Australia were reported in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database. The patients were categorised as ‘not frail’ (CFS 1-3), ‘mildly frail’ (CFS 4-5) and ‘moderately-to-severely frail’ (CFS 6-8).</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was survival time up to two years, which we analysed using Cox regression models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 4028 patients with COVID-19 in the final analysis. ‘Moderately-to-severely frail’ patients were older (66.6 [56.3–75.8] vs. 69.9 [60.3–78.1]; p &lt; 0.001) than those without frailty (median [interquartile range] 53.0 [40.1–64.6]), had higher sequential organ failure assessment scores (p &lt; 0.001), and less likely to receive mechanical ventilation (p &lt; 0.001) than patients without frailty or mild frailty. After adjusting for confounders, patients with mild frailty (adjusted hazards ratio: 2.31, 95%-CI: 1.75–3.05) and moderate-to-severe frailty (adjusted hazards ratio: 2.54, 95%-CI: 1.89–3.42) had higher mortality rates than those without frailty.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Frailty was independently associated with shorter survival times to two years in patients with severe COVID-19 in ANZ following hospital discharge. Recognising frailty provides individualised patient intervention in those with frailty admitted to ICUs with severe COVID-19.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":"26 1","pages":"Pages 16-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S144127722302224X/pdfft?md5=623a0c26eafbdc32cf648670cb8341a7&pid=1-s2.0-S144127722302224X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of frailty on long-term survival in patients discharged alive from hospital after an ICU admission with COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Ashwin Subramaniam MBBS MMed FRACP FCICM PhD ,&nbsp;Ryan Ruiyang Ling Dr MBBS ,&nbsp;David Pilcher MBBS MRCP(UK) FRACP FCICM\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3><strong>Objective</strong></h3><p>Though frailty is associated with mortality, its impact on long-term survival after an ICU admission with COVID-19 is unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between frailty and long-term survival in patients after an ICU admission with COVID-19.</p></div><div><h3><strong>Design, Setting and Participants</strong></h3><p>This registry-based multicentre, retrospective, cohort study included all patients ≥16 years discharged alive from the hospital following an ICU admission with COVID-19 and documented clinical frailty scale (CFS). Data from 118 ICUs between 01/01/2020 through 31/12/2020 in New Zealand and 31/12/2021 in Australia were reported in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database. The patients were categorised as ‘not frail’ (CFS 1-3), ‘mildly frail’ (CFS 4-5) and ‘moderately-to-severely frail’ (CFS 6-8).</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was survival time up to two years, which we analysed using Cox regression models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 4028 patients with COVID-19 in the final analysis. ‘Moderately-to-severely frail’ patients were older (66.6 [56.3–75.8] vs. 69.9 [60.3–78.1]; p &lt; 0.001) than those without frailty (median [interquartile range] 53.0 [40.1–64.6]), had higher sequential organ failure assessment scores (p &lt; 0.001), and less likely to receive mechanical ventilation (p &lt; 0.001) than patients without frailty or mild frailty. After adjusting for confounders, patients with mild frailty (adjusted hazards ratio: 2.31, 95%-CI: 1.75–3.05) and moderate-to-severe frailty (adjusted hazards ratio: 2.54, 95%-CI: 1.89–3.42) had higher mortality rates than those without frailty.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Frailty was independently associated with shorter survival times to two years in patients with severe COVID-19 in ANZ following hospital discharge. Recognising frailty provides individualised patient intervention in those with frailty admitted to ICUs with severe COVID-19.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 16-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S144127722302224X/pdfft?md5=623a0c26eafbdc32cf648670cb8341a7&pid=1-s2.0-S144127722302224X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S144127722302224X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S144127722302224X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的虽然虚弱与死亡率有关,但其对使用 COVID-19 入住 ICU 后长期生存的影响尚不清楚。这项基于登记的多中心、回顾性、队列研究纳入了所有因 COVID-19 而入住 ICU 并有临床虚弱量表(CFS)记录的≥16 岁出院的患者。澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护协会成人患者数据库(Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database)报告了新西兰118个重症监护病房在2020年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间以及澳大利亚在2021年12月31日期间的数据。患者被分为 "不虚弱"(CFS 1-3)、"轻度虚弱"(CFS 4-5)和 "中度至重度虚弱"(CFS 6-8)。中度至重度虚弱 "患者的年龄(66.6 [56.3-75.8] vs. 69.9 [60.3-78.1]; p <0.001)高于无虚弱患者(中位数 [四分位间范围] 53.0 [40.1-64.6]),器官功能衰竭顺序评估评分更高(p <0.001),接受机械通气的可能性也低于无虚弱或轻度虚弱患者(p <0.001)。在对混杂因素进行调整后,轻度虚弱(调整后危险比:2.31,95%-CI:1.75-3.05)和中重度虚弱(调整后危险比:2.54,95%-CI:1.89-3.42)患者的死亡率高于无虚弱患者。识别虚弱程度可为入住重症监护病房的重症 COVID-19 患者提供个体化干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of frailty on long-term survival in patients discharged alive from hospital after an ICU admission with COVID-19

Objective

Though frailty is associated with mortality, its impact on long-term survival after an ICU admission with COVID-19 is unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between frailty and long-term survival in patients after an ICU admission with COVID-19.

Design, Setting and Participants

This registry-based multicentre, retrospective, cohort study included all patients ≥16 years discharged alive from the hospital following an ICU admission with COVID-19 and documented clinical frailty scale (CFS). Data from 118 ICUs between 01/01/2020 through 31/12/2020 in New Zealand and 31/12/2021 in Australia were reported in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database. The patients were categorised as ‘not frail’ (CFS 1-3), ‘mildly frail’ (CFS 4-5) and ‘moderately-to-severely frail’ (CFS 6-8).

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome was survival time up to two years, which we analysed using Cox regression models.

Results

We included 4028 patients with COVID-19 in the final analysis. ‘Moderately-to-severely frail’ patients were older (66.6 [56.3–75.8] vs. 69.9 [60.3–78.1]; p < 0.001) than those without frailty (median [interquartile range] 53.0 [40.1–64.6]), had higher sequential organ failure assessment scores (p < 0.001), and less likely to receive mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001) than patients without frailty or mild frailty. After adjusting for confounders, patients with mild frailty (adjusted hazards ratio: 2.31, 95%-CI: 1.75–3.05) and moderate-to-severe frailty (adjusted hazards ratio: 2.54, 95%-CI: 1.89–3.42) had higher mortality rates than those without frailty.

Conclusions

Frailty was independently associated with shorter survival times to two years in patients with severe COVID-19 in ANZ following hospital discharge. Recognising frailty provides individualised patient intervention in those with frailty admitted to ICUs with severe COVID-19.

Clinical trial registration

Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care and Resuscitation
Critical Care and Resuscitation CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines. The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world. The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.
期刊最新文献
Recommendations for the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM) trainee research project: A modified Delphi study ARDS, guidelines and ANZ practice: The persistent disconnect Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in Australia and New Zealand (SAGE-ANZ): An observational study Sonographic evaluation of intracranial hemodynamics and pressure after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An exploratory sub-study of the TAME trial A retrospective registry-based study into the proportion of patients admitted to intensive care who have anaphylaxis as a principal diagnosis and their outcomes in Australia and New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1