值班心脏病学对二级中心 STEMI 患者再灌注治疗的影响。

Q4 Medicine REC: CardioClinics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rccl.2023.11.002
{"title":"值班心脏病学对二级中心 STEMI 患者再灌注治疗的影响。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rccl.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>The care of patients with cardiovascular disease by specialist in cardiology has shown better results in different spectrums. However, the presence of an on-call cardiologist is still rare in non-tertiary hospitals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>STEMI was recorded consecutively between 2006 and 2016 in a second level center. We analyzed and compared two periods: regional heart attack care network without a cardiology guard (2006-2011) and a second period (2012-2016) with both measures working.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1524 patients were included, 47.2% after the start of cardiology shift. We observed an increase in primary angioplasty (34.3% to 75.7%, <em>P</em> &lt;<!--> <!-->.001) as well as a reduction in door-to-balloon time of 64<!--> <!-->minutes (220 [IQR, 167-290] to 156 [IQR, 130-197], <em>P</em> &lt;<!--> <!-->.001). This translates into a shorter hospital stay as well as a reduction in complications during hospitalization, mainly recurrent ischemia. Although there is a trend towards lower hospital mortality, mortality during follow-up did not change with the cardiology guard.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The presence of a cardiologist on call increases the number of patients reperfused, and shortens the time until it. This translates into a shorter hospital stay, as well as lower short-term mortality. Our results indicate that the creation of the cardiological guard brings additional benefit to the care network for patients with STEMI.</p><p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: <span><span>NCT02501070</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36870,"journal":{"name":"REC: CardioClinics","volume":"59 3","pages":"Pages 159-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacto de la guardia de cardiología en el tratamiento de reperfusión de los pacientes con IAMCEST en un centro de segundo nivel\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rccl.2023.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>The care of patients with cardiovascular disease by specialist in cardiology has shown better results in different spectrums. However, the presence of an on-call cardiologist is still rare in non-tertiary hospitals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>STEMI was recorded consecutively between 2006 and 2016 in a second level center. We analyzed and compared two periods: regional heart attack care network without a cardiology guard (2006-2011) and a second period (2012-2016) with both measures working.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1524 patients were included, 47.2% after the start of cardiology shift. We observed an increase in primary angioplasty (34.3% to 75.7%, <em>P</em> &lt;<!--> <!-->.001) as well as a reduction in door-to-balloon time of 64<!--> <!-->minutes (220 [IQR, 167-290] to 156 [IQR, 130-197], <em>P</em> &lt;<!--> <!-->.001). This translates into a shorter hospital stay as well as a reduction in complications during hospitalization, mainly recurrent ischemia. Although there is a trend towards lower hospital mortality, mortality during follow-up did not change with the cardiology guard.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The presence of a cardiologist on call increases the number of patients reperfused, and shortens the time until it. This translates into a shorter hospital stay, as well as lower short-term mortality. Our results indicate that the creation of the cardiological guard brings additional benefit to the care network for patients with STEMI.</p><p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: <span><span>NCT02501070</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REC: CardioClinics\",\"volume\":\"59 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 159-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REC: CardioClinics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2605153223003345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC: CardioClinics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2605153223003345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言和目的由心脏病学专家对心血管疾病患者进行治疗在不同领域都取得了较好的效果。然而,在非三级医院中,心脏病专家值班的情况仍然很少见。方法2006年至2016年期间,一家二级中心连续记录了STEMI。我们对两个时期进行了分析和比较:没有心内科门卫的地区性心脏病治疗网络(2006-2011 年)和有这两种措施的第二个时期(2012-2016 年)。结果 1524 名患者被纳入其中,47.2% 的患者是在心内科值班开始后接受治疗的。我们观察到初级血管成形术的比例有所上升(从 34.3% 上升到 75.7%,P < .001),从门诊到气球植入术的时间缩短了 64 分钟(从 220 [IQR, 167-290] 下降到 156 [IQR, 130-197],P < .001)。这不仅缩短了住院时间,还减少了住院期间的并发症,主要是复发性缺血。虽然住院死亡率有降低的趋势,但随访期间的死亡率并没有因为有心脏病专家值班而发生变化。这不仅缩短了住院时间,还降低了短期死亡率。我们的研究结果表明,设立心脏科警卫能为 STEMI 患者的护理网络带来更多益处:NCT02501070。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impacto de la guardia de cardiología en el tratamiento de reperfusión de los pacientes con IAMCEST en un centro de segundo nivel

Introduction and objectives

The care of patients with cardiovascular disease by specialist in cardiology has shown better results in different spectrums. However, the presence of an on-call cardiologist is still rare in non-tertiary hospitals.

Methods

STEMI was recorded consecutively between 2006 and 2016 in a second level center. We analyzed and compared two periods: regional heart attack care network without a cardiology guard (2006-2011) and a second period (2012-2016) with both measures working.

Results

1524 patients were included, 47.2% after the start of cardiology shift. We observed an increase in primary angioplasty (34.3% to 75.7%, P < .001) as well as a reduction in door-to-balloon time of 64 minutes (220 [IQR, 167-290] to 156 [IQR, 130-197], P < .001). This translates into a shorter hospital stay as well as a reduction in complications during hospitalization, mainly recurrent ischemia. Although there is a trend towards lower hospital mortality, mortality during follow-up did not change with the cardiology guard.

Conclusions

The presence of a cardiologist on call increases the number of patients reperfused, and shortens the time until it. This translates into a shorter hospital stay, as well as lower short-term mortality. Our results indicate that the creation of the cardiological guard brings additional benefit to the care network for patients with STEMI.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02501070.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REC: CardioClinics
REC: CardioClinics Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
Origen anómalo de la arteria pulmonar derecha en un adulto Characterizing the “iceberg peak” in valvular heart disease: Outcomes and costs of in-hospital procedures in Spain Non-invasive multiparametric assessment of intracardiac tumor Fibroelastoma papilar aórtico e ictus: un caso ilustrativo Underuse of systemic thrombolysis in pulmonary embolism: A single center retrospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1