{"title":"被埋葬但未死亡:溪流和湿地丧失对红线社区洪水风险的影响","authors":"Jacob Napieralski, Atreyi Guin, Catherine Sulich","doi":"10.1016/j.cacint.2023.100134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The United States government sponsored the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC) in the 1930s to assess and grade neighborhoods based on perceived financial risk. The grades were influenced by the presence of minority racial groups, immigrants, and residents with lower socioeconomic statuses and, even though the practice was eventually outlawed, the impact on low income and underrepresented minorities is still prevalent today. This study was designed to assess spatial patterns and intensity of flood risk to (a) HOLC grade, (b) proximity to coastal zones, (c) intensity of vegetative cover, and (d) relationship to buried (ghost) streams and wetlands to determine which variable has the most impact on flood risk. Flood risk data, acquired from First Street Foundation’s Flood Factor dataset, was summarized by HOLC grade, and ghost streams and wetlands were digitized from historical maps and aggregated by HOLC grade. The results show flood risk is higher in C and D graded neighborhoods, compared to A and B. Regardless of HOLC grade, neighborhoods near the Detroit River and Lake St. Claire have 10 times higher flood risk than inland neighborhoods. Interestingly, B-graded neighborhoods exhibit minimal impact from buried rivers and wetlands, but that risk increases substantially if there is a history of stream or wetland burial within a D graded neighborhood. Flood risk is disproportionately distributed, caused in part by outlawed, racist housing policies. Understanding where risk is highest can help identify optimum locations for adaptation measures to minimize flood damage in these neighborhoods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52395,"journal":{"name":"City and Environment Interactions","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100134"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590252023000363/pdfft?md5=14ad97e73705a5ff2e18218fe227e809&pid=1-s2.0-S2590252023000363-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Buried but not dead: The impact of stream and wetland loss on flood risk in redlined neighborhoods\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Napieralski, Atreyi Guin, Catherine Sulich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cacint.2023.100134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The United States government sponsored the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC) in the 1930s to assess and grade neighborhoods based on perceived financial risk. The grades were influenced by the presence of minority racial groups, immigrants, and residents with lower socioeconomic statuses and, even though the practice was eventually outlawed, the impact on low income and underrepresented minorities is still prevalent today. This study was designed to assess spatial patterns and intensity of flood risk to (a) HOLC grade, (b) proximity to coastal zones, (c) intensity of vegetative cover, and (d) relationship to buried (ghost) streams and wetlands to determine which variable has the most impact on flood risk. Flood risk data, acquired from First Street Foundation’s Flood Factor dataset, was summarized by HOLC grade, and ghost streams and wetlands were digitized from historical maps and aggregated by HOLC grade. The results show flood risk is higher in C and D graded neighborhoods, compared to A and B. Regardless of HOLC grade, neighborhoods near the Detroit River and Lake St. Claire have 10 times higher flood risk than inland neighborhoods. Interestingly, B-graded neighborhoods exhibit minimal impact from buried rivers and wetlands, but that risk increases substantially if there is a history of stream or wetland burial within a D graded neighborhood. Flood risk is disproportionately distributed, caused in part by outlawed, racist housing policies. Understanding where risk is highest can help identify optimum locations for adaptation measures to minimize flood damage in these neighborhoods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"City and Environment Interactions\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590252023000363/pdfft?md5=14ad97e73705a5ff2e18218fe227e809&pid=1-s2.0-S2590252023000363-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"City and Environment Interactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590252023000363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City and Environment Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590252023000363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
20 世纪 30 年代,美国政府发起成立了房屋所有者贷款公司(HOLC),根据预期的金融风险对社区进行评估和分级。尽管这种做法最终被取缔,但对低收入和代表性不足的少数族裔的影响至今仍然普遍存在。本研究旨在评估洪水风险的空间模式和强度,包括:(a) HOLC 等级;(b) 是否靠近沿海地区;(c) 植被覆盖强度;(d) 与被掩埋(幽灵)溪流和湿地的关系,以确定哪个变量对洪水风险的影响最大。洪水风险数据来自 First Street 基金会的洪水因子数据集,并按 HOLC 等级进行了汇总,而幽灵溪流和湿地则是从历史地图中数字化而来,并按 HOLC 等级进行了汇总。结果显示,与 A 级和 B 级社区相比,C 级和 D 级社区的洪水风险更高。无论 HOLC 等级如何,底特律河和圣克莱尔湖附近社区的洪水风险比内陆社区高 10 倍。有趣的是,B 级居民区受河流和湿地掩埋的影响很小,但如果 D 级居民区内曾有河流或湿地掩埋,风险就会大大增加。洪水风险的分布不成比例,部分原因是非法的种族主义住房政策。了解哪些地方的风险最高,有助于确定采取适应措施的最佳地点,从而最大限度地减少这些社区的洪灾损失。
Buried but not dead: The impact of stream and wetland loss on flood risk in redlined neighborhoods
The United States government sponsored the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC) in the 1930s to assess and grade neighborhoods based on perceived financial risk. The grades were influenced by the presence of minority racial groups, immigrants, and residents with lower socioeconomic statuses and, even though the practice was eventually outlawed, the impact on low income and underrepresented minorities is still prevalent today. This study was designed to assess spatial patterns and intensity of flood risk to (a) HOLC grade, (b) proximity to coastal zones, (c) intensity of vegetative cover, and (d) relationship to buried (ghost) streams and wetlands to determine which variable has the most impact on flood risk. Flood risk data, acquired from First Street Foundation’s Flood Factor dataset, was summarized by HOLC grade, and ghost streams and wetlands were digitized from historical maps and aggregated by HOLC grade. The results show flood risk is higher in C and D graded neighborhoods, compared to A and B. Regardless of HOLC grade, neighborhoods near the Detroit River and Lake St. Claire have 10 times higher flood risk than inland neighborhoods. Interestingly, B-graded neighborhoods exhibit minimal impact from buried rivers and wetlands, but that risk increases substantially if there is a history of stream or wetland burial within a D graded neighborhood. Flood risk is disproportionately distributed, caused in part by outlawed, racist housing policies. Understanding where risk is highest can help identify optimum locations for adaptation measures to minimize flood damage in these neighborhoods.