我们希望与技术建立何种关系?学校中的技术怀疑论

IF 2.6 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Harvard Educational Review Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.17763/1943-5045-93.4.486
Jacob Pleasants, Daniel G. Krutka, T. P. Nichols
{"title":"我们希望与技术建立何种关系?学校中的技术怀疑论","authors":"Jacob Pleasants, Daniel G. Krutka, T. P. Nichols","doi":"10.17763/1943-5045-93.4.486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, Jacob Pleasants, Dani el G. Krutka, and T. Philip Nichols outline a vision for how technology education can and ought to occur through the core subject areas of science, social studies, and English language arts. In their argument for the development of a technoskeptical stance for thinking critically and making informed decisions about technology, they discuss past and current efforts to address both the teaching and use of technology within the subject areas and possibilities for a deeper and more coherent technology education. To support that goal, they present the Technoskepticism Iceberg as a conceptual framework to identify the technical, psycho social, and political dimensions of technology and highlight ways of thinking with greater depth about those dimensions.","PeriodicalId":48207,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Educational Review","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Relationships Do We Want with Technology? Toward Technoskepticism in Schools\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Pleasants, Daniel G. Krutka, T. P. Nichols\",\"doi\":\"10.17763/1943-5045-93.4.486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this essay, Jacob Pleasants, Dani el G. Krutka, and T. Philip Nichols outline a vision for how technology education can and ought to occur through the core subject areas of science, social studies, and English language arts. In their argument for the development of a technoskeptical stance for thinking critically and making informed decisions about technology, they discuss past and current efforts to address both the teaching and use of technology within the subject areas and possibilities for a deeper and more coherent technology education. To support that goal, they present the Technoskepticism Iceberg as a conceptual framework to identify the technical, psycho social, and political dimensions of technology and highlight ways of thinking with greater depth about those dimensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Educational Review\",\"volume\":\"14 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Educational Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-93.4.486\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Educational Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-93.4.486","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,雅各布-普莱森茨(Jacob Pleasants)、丹尼-克鲁特卡(Dani el G. Krutka)和T-菲利普-尼科尔斯(T. Philip Nichols)概述了如何通过科学、社会研究和英语语言艺术等核心学科领域开展技术教育的愿景。他们主张发展技术怀疑论的立场,以便对技术进行批判性思考并做出明智的决定。他们讨论了过去和当前在学科领域内解决技术教学和使用问题的努力,以及更深入、更连贯的技术教育的可能性。为了支持这一目标,他们提出了技术怀疑论冰山(Technoskepticism Iceberg)这一概念框架,以确定技术的技术、社会心理和政治层面,并强调对这些层面进行更深入思考的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Relationships Do We Want with Technology? Toward Technoskepticism in Schools
In this essay, Jacob Pleasants, Dani el G. Krutka, and T. Philip Nichols outline a vision for how technology education can and ought to occur through the core subject areas of science, social studies, and English language arts. In their argument for the development of a technoskeptical stance for thinking critically and making informed decisions about technology, they discuss past and current efforts to address both the teaching and use of technology within the subject areas and possibilities for a deeper and more coherent technology education. To support that goal, they present the Technoskepticism Iceberg as a conceptual framework to identify the technical, psycho social, and political dimensions of technology and highlight ways of thinking with greater depth about those dimensions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Harvard Educational Review
Harvard Educational Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Harvard Educational Review (HER) accepts contributions from researchers, scholars, policy makers, practitioners, teachers, students, and informed observers in education and related fields. In addition to original reports of research and theory, HER welcomes articles that reflect on teaching and practice in educational settings in the United States and abroad.
期刊最新文献
“Whatever You Want to Call It”: Science of Reading Mythologies in the Education Reform Movement Language and Education in Africa: A Fresh Approach to the Debates on Language, Education, and Cultural Identity, by Bert van Pinxteren From Democratic Participation to Cariño: Exploring the Core Commitments of Foundational Scholars in the Field of Youth Participatory Action Research What Relationships Do We Want with Technology? Toward Technoskepticism in Schools Expanding the Reasons We Give: Black Parents’ Collective Engagement as Resisting White Supremacy at School
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1