Andrea Papa MD, Teodor Serban MD, Ivo Strebel PhD, Sven Knecht DSc, PhD, Corinne Isenegger MMed, Thomas Nestelberger MD, Christoph Kaiser MD, Gregor Leibundgut MD, Philipp Haaf MD, Beat Schaer MD, Philipp Krisai MD, Stefan Osswald MD, Christian Sticherling MD, Michael Kühne MD, Patrick Badertscher MD
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣置换术后植入深度和钙负荷对瓣下传导延迟的影响","authors":"Andrea Papa MD, Teodor Serban MD, Ivo Strebel PhD, Sven Knecht DSc, PhD, Corinne Isenegger MMed, Thomas Nestelberger MD, Christoph Kaiser MD, Gregor Leibundgut MD, Philipp Haaf MD, Beat Schaer MD, Philipp Krisai MD, Stefan Osswald MD, Christian Sticherling MD, Michael Kühne MD, Patrick Badertscher MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2023.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Infranodal conduction disorders are common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Risk factors are incompletely understood.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of valve implantation depth and calcium burden of the device landing zone on infranodal conduction intraprocedure pre- and post-TAVR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In all patients undergoing TAVR between June 2020 and June 2021, the His-ventricle (HV) interval was measured pre- and post-valve deployment. The difference between the 2 measurements defined delta HV, whereas infranodal conduction delay was defined as HV interval >55 ms. Valve implantation depth was measured as the distance between the aortic annular plane and the ventricular prosthesis end. Calcium burden was quantified as the volume of calcium in 6 regions of interest: the non-, right, and left coronary cusps (NCC, RCC, and LCC, respectively) and the corresponding regions of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) underlying each cusp (LVOT<sub>NCC</sub>, LVOT<sub>RCC</sub>, LVOT<sub>LCC</sub>, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 101 patients (mean age 81 ± 5.7 years; 47% women), 37 demonstrated infranodal conduction delay intraprocedure post-TAVR. Overall, mean implantation depth was 5 ± 3.1 mm, median calcium volume was 2080 mm<sup>3</sup> [interquartile range 632–2400]. Delta HV showed no correlation with implantation depth or calcium burden (r = –0.08 and r = 0.12, respectively). However, LVOT<sub>NCC</sub> calcification was a significant predictor for infranodal conduction delay post-valve deployment in a multivariable logistic regression model (odds ratio 1.62 per 100-mm<sup>3</sup> increase (95% confidence interval 1.06–2.69; <em>P</em> = .04).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Assessment of LVOT<sub>NCC</sub> calcification may identify patients at risk for infranodal conduction delay after TAVR, whereas implantation depth did not predict infranodal conduction delay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 113-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501823003331/pdfft?md5=e6605a3bc18bceee3c6128c0d47a4664&pid=1-s2.0-S2666501823003331-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of implantation depth and calcium burden on infranodal conduction delay after transcatheter aortic valve replacement\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Papa MD, Teodor Serban MD, Ivo Strebel PhD, Sven Knecht DSc, PhD, Corinne Isenegger MMed, Thomas Nestelberger MD, Christoph Kaiser MD, Gregor Leibundgut MD, Philipp Haaf MD, Beat Schaer MD, Philipp Krisai MD, Stefan Osswald MD, Christian Sticherling MD, Michael Kühne MD, Patrick Badertscher MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hroo.2023.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Infranodal conduction disorders are common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Risk factors are incompletely understood.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of valve implantation depth and calcium burden of the device landing zone on infranodal conduction intraprocedure pre- and post-TAVR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In all patients undergoing TAVR between June 2020 and June 2021, the His-ventricle (HV) interval was measured pre- and post-valve deployment. The difference between the 2 measurements defined delta HV, whereas infranodal conduction delay was defined as HV interval >55 ms. Valve implantation depth was measured as the distance between the aortic annular plane and the ventricular prosthesis end. Calcium burden was quantified as the volume of calcium in 6 regions of interest: the non-, right, and left coronary cusps (NCC, RCC, and LCC, respectively) and the corresponding regions of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) underlying each cusp (LVOT<sub>NCC</sub>, LVOT<sub>RCC</sub>, LVOT<sub>LCC</sub>, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 101 patients (mean age 81 ± 5.7 years; 47% women), 37 demonstrated infranodal conduction delay intraprocedure post-TAVR. Overall, mean implantation depth was 5 ± 3.1 mm, median calcium volume was 2080 mm<sup>3</sup> [interquartile range 632–2400]. Delta HV showed no correlation with implantation depth or calcium burden (r = –0.08 and r = 0.12, respectively). However, LVOT<sub>NCC</sub> calcification was a significant predictor for infranodal conduction delay post-valve deployment in a multivariable logistic regression model (odds ratio 1.62 per 100-mm<sup>3</sup> increase (95% confidence interval 1.06–2.69; <em>P</em> = .04).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Assessment of LVOT<sub>NCC</sub> calcification may identify patients at risk for infranodal conduction delay after TAVR, whereas implantation depth did not predict infranodal conduction delay.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 113-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501823003331/pdfft?md5=e6605a3bc18bceee3c6128c0d47a4664&pid=1-s2.0-S2666501823003331-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501823003331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501823003331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of implantation depth and calcium burden on infranodal conduction delay after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Background
Infranodal conduction disorders are common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Risk factors are incompletely understood.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of valve implantation depth and calcium burden of the device landing zone on infranodal conduction intraprocedure pre- and post-TAVR.
Methods
In all patients undergoing TAVR between June 2020 and June 2021, the His-ventricle (HV) interval was measured pre- and post-valve deployment. The difference between the 2 measurements defined delta HV, whereas infranodal conduction delay was defined as HV interval >55 ms. Valve implantation depth was measured as the distance between the aortic annular plane and the ventricular prosthesis end. Calcium burden was quantified as the volume of calcium in 6 regions of interest: the non-, right, and left coronary cusps (NCC, RCC, and LCC, respectively) and the corresponding regions of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) underlying each cusp (LVOTNCC, LVOTRCC, LVOTLCC, respectively).
Results
Of 101 patients (mean age 81 ± 5.7 years; 47% women), 37 demonstrated infranodal conduction delay intraprocedure post-TAVR. Overall, mean implantation depth was 5 ± 3.1 mm, median calcium volume was 2080 mm3 [interquartile range 632–2400]. Delta HV showed no correlation with implantation depth or calcium burden (r = –0.08 and r = 0.12, respectively). However, LVOTNCC calcification was a significant predictor for infranodal conduction delay post-valve deployment in a multivariable logistic regression model (odds ratio 1.62 per 100-mm3 increase (95% confidence interval 1.06–2.69; P = .04).
Conclusion
Assessment of LVOTNCC calcification may identify patients at risk for infranodal conduction delay after TAVR, whereas implantation depth did not predict infranodal conduction delay.