C. Wood, Kathleen R. Johnson, Lindsey. E. Lewis, K. Wright, Jessica K. Wang, A. Borsato, Michael L. Griffiths, Andrew Mason, Gideon M. Henderson, Jacob B. Setera, S. Frisia, Sengphone Keophanhya, Joyce C. White
{"title":"东南亚大陆 8.2 ka 事件的高分辨率多代理地层记录","authors":"C. Wood, Kathleen R. Johnson, Lindsey. E. Lewis, K. Wright, Jessica K. Wang, A. Borsato, Michael L. Griffiths, Andrew Mason, Gideon M. Henderson, Jacob B. Setera, S. Frisia, Sengphone Keophanhya, Joyce C. White","doi":"10.1029/2023pa004675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 8.2 ka event is the most significant global climate anomaly of the Holocene epoch, but a lack of records from Mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA) currently limits our understanding of the spatial and temporal extent of the climate response. A newly developed speleothem record from Tham Doun Mai Cave, Northern Laos provides the first high‐resolution record of this event in MSEA. Our multiproxy record (δ18O, δ13C, Mg/Ca, Sr/Ca, and petrographic data), anchored in time by 9 U‐Th ages, reveals a significant reduction in local rainfall amount and weakening of the monsoon at the event onset at ∼8.29 ± 0.03 ka BP. This response lasts for a minimum of ∼170 years, similar to event length estimates from other speleothem δ18O monsoon records. Interestingly, however, our δ13C and Mg/Ca data, proxies for local hydrology, show that abrupt changes to local rainfall amounts began decades earlier (∼70 years) than registered in the δ18O. Moreover, the δ13C and Mg/Ca also show that reductions in rainfall continued for at least ∼200 years longer than the weakening of the monsoon inferred from the δ18O. Our interpretations suggest that drier conditions brought on by the 8.2 ka event in MSEA were felt beyond the temporal boundaries defined by δ18O‐inferred monsoon intensity, and an initial wet period (or precursor event) may have preceded the local drying. Most existing Asian Monsoon proxy records of the 8.2 ka event may lack the resolution and/or multiproxy information necessary to establish local and regional hydrological sensitivity to abrupt climate change.","PeriodicalId":54239,"journal":{"name":"Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology","volume":"198 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High‐Resolution, Multiproxy Speleothem Record of the 8.2 ka Event From Mainland Southeast Asia\",\"authors\":\"C. Wood, Kathleen R. Johnson, Lindsey. E. Lewis, K. Wright, Jessica K. Wang, A. Borsato, Michael L. Griffiths, Andrew Mason, Gideon M. Henderson, Jacob B. Setera, S. Frisia, Sengphone Keophanhya, Joyce C. White\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2023pa004675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 8.2 ka event is the most significant global climate anomaly of the Holocene epoch, but a lack of records from Mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA) currently limits our understanding of the spatial and temporal extent of the climate response. A newly developed speleothem record from Tham Doun Mai Cave, Northern Laos provides the first high‐resolution record of this event in MSEA. Our multiproxy record (δ18O, δ13C, Mg/Ca, Sr/Ca, and petrographic data), anchored in time by 9 U‐Th ages, reveals a significant reduction in local rainfall amount and weakening of the monsoon at the event onset at ∼8.29 ± 0.03 ka BP. This response lasts for a minimum of ∼170 years, similar to event length estimates from other speleothem δ18O monsoon records. Interestingly, however, our δ13C and Mg/Ca data, proxies for local hydrology, show that abrupt changes to local rainfall amounts began decades earlier (∼70 years) than registered in the δ18O. Moreover, the δ13C and Mg/Ca also show that reductions in rainfall continued for at least ∼200 years longer than the weakening of the monsoon inferred from the δ18O. Our interpretations suggest that drier conditions brought on by the 8.2 ka event in MSEA were felt beyond the temporal boundaries defined by δ18O‐inferred monsoon intensity, and an initial wet period (or precursor event) may have preceded the local drying. Most existing Asian Monsoon proxy records of the 8.2 ka event may lack the resolution and/or multiproxy information necessary to establish local and regional hydrological sensitivity to abrupt climate change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023pa004675\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023pa004675","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
8.2 ka事件是全新世时期最重要的全球气候异常现象,但目前东南亚大陆(MSEA)记录的缺乏限制了我们对气候响应的时空范围的了解。老挝北部 Tham Doun Mai 洞穴新发现的岩浆记录首次提供了东南亚大陆这一事件的高分辨率记录。我们的多代理记录(δ18O、δ13C、Mg/Ca、Sr/Ca 和岩石学数据)以 9 个铀-钍年龄为时间锚定,揭示了在事件开始(8.29 ± 0.03 ka BP)时当地降雨量的显著减少和季风的减弱。这种反应至少持续了 170 年,与其他岩浆δ18O 季风记录估计的事件持续时间相似。然而,有趣的是,我们的δ13C 和 Mg/Ca 数据(当地水文的代用指标)显示,当地降雨量的突然变化比δ18O 记录的时间早几十年(∼70 年)。此外,δ13C 和 Mg/Ca 还表明,降雨量的减少至少持续了 200 年,比根据δ18O 推断的季风减弱的时间要长。我们的解释表明,MSEA 8.2 ka事件带来的较干旱条件超出了δ18O推断的季风强度所定义的时间界限,在局部干燥之前可能有一个初始的湿润期(或前兆事件)。大多数关于 8.2 ka 事件的现有亚洲季风代用记录可能缺乏必要的分辨率和/或多代用信息,无法确定当地和区域水文对突变气候变化的敏感性。
High‐Resolution, Multiproxy Speleothem Record of the 8.2 ka Event From Mainland Southeast Asia
The 8.2 ka event is the most significant global climate anomaly of the Holocene epoch, but a lack of records from Mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA) currently limits our understanding of the spatial and temporal extent of the climate response. A newly developed speleothem record from Tham Doun Mai Cave, Northern Laos provides the first high‐resolution record of this event in MSEA. Our multiproxy record (δ18O, δ13C, Mg/Ca, Sr/Ca, and petrographic data), anchored in time by 9 U‐Th ages, reveals a significant reduction in local rainfall amount and weakening of the monsoon at the event onset at ∼8.29 ± 0.03 ka BP. This response lasts for a minimum of ∼170 years, similar to event length estimates from other speleothem δ18O monsoon records. Interestingly, however, our δ13C and Mg/Ca data, proxies for local hydrology, show that abrupt changes to local rainfall amounts began decades earlier (∼70 years) than registered in the δ18O. Moreover, the δ13C and Mg/Ca also show that reductions in rainfall continued for at least ∼200 years longer than the weakening of the monsoon inferred from the δ18O. Our interpretations suggest that drier conditions brought on by the 8.2 ka event in MSEA were felt beyond the temporal boundaries defined by δ18O‐inferred monsoon intensity, and an initial wet period (or precursor event) may have preceded the local drying. Most existing Asian Monsoon proxy records of the 8.2 ka event may lack the resolution and/or multiproxy information necessary to establish local and regional hydrological sensitivity to abrupt climate change.
期刊介绍:
Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology (PALO) publishes papers dealing with records of past environments, biota and climate. Understanding of the Earth system as it was in the past requires the employment of a wide range of approaches including marine and lacustrine sedimentology and speleothems; ice sheet formation and flow; stable isotope, trace element, and organic geochemistry; paleontology and molecular paleontology; evolutionary processes; mineralization in organisms; understanding tree-ring formation; seismic stratigraphy; physical, chemical, and biological oceanography; geochemical, climate and earth system modeling, and many others. The scope of this journal is regional to global, rather than local, and includes studies of any geologic age (Precambrian to Quaternary, including modern analogs). Within this framework, papers on the following topics are to be included: chronology, stratigraphy (where relevant to correlation of paleoceanographic events), paleoreconstructions, paleoceanographic modeling, paleocirculation (deep, intermediate, and shallow), paleoclimatology (e.g., paleowinds and cryosphere history), global sediment and geochemical cycles, anoxia, sea level changes and effects, relations between biotic evolution and paleoceanography, biotic crises, paleobiology (e.g., ecology of “microfossils” used in paleoceanography), techniques and approaches in paleoceanographic inferences, and modern paleoceanographic analogs, and quantitative and integrative analysis of coupled ocean-atmosphere-biosphere processes. Paleoceanographic and Paleoclimate studies enable us to use the past in order to gain information on possible future climatic and biotic developments: the past is the key to the future, just as much and maybe more than the present is the key to the past.