59 纤维肌痛患者与非纤维肌痛患者数字时钟绘制的初步调查

IF 2.6 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI:10.1017/s1355617723009177
Yonah Joffe, Catherine Dion, Emily F Matusz, Shawna Amini, Patrick J Tighe, Michael E Robinson, Catherine Price
{"title":"59 纤维肌痛患者与非纤维肌痛患者数字时钟绘制的初步调查","authors":"Yonah Joffe, Catherine Dion, Emily F Matusz, Shawna Amini, Patrick J Tighe, Michael E Robinson, Catherine Price","doi":"10.1017/s1355617723009177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:Widespread musculoskeletal pain disorders like fibromyalgia are often accompanied by varying levels of cognitive dysfunction. Fibromyalgia research suggests that around the time of diagnosis, typically 30-50 years of age, many patients are already showing cognitive difficulties on various neuropsychological assessments. It is unknown, however, how older adults with fibromyalgia perform on rapid cognitive screeners in clinical settings. The present study compared older adults with and without fibromyalgia on a digitized version of a classic neuropsychological screener, the clock drawing test.Participants and Methods:Participants aged 65+ were recruited as part of a larger IRB-approved and federally funded investigation within the preoperative surgical center at the University of Florida (UF) and UF Health. Participant data were obtained with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) waiver and honest broker medical extraction from January 2018 to December 2019 (N=14,807). Based on medical record diagnostic code, participants were categorized into fibromyalgia or non-fibromyalgia groups, then propensity score matched based on age, ethnicity, race, sex, and years of education. The final sample contained 718 older adults (mean age= 71.3±4.89, education years= 13.7±2.62, female= 98.1%, white= 87.9%) (n=359 in each group). All participants completed the command and copy condition of the digital Clock Drawing Test (dCDT). Variables of interest for both conditions included: total completion time (TCT), pre-first hand latency (PFHL), clock face area (CFA), and digit misplacement. These variables were chosen to represent two latency and two graphomotor variables. A natural log transformation was applied to all dCDT variables to achieve normality of the distribution.Results:We confirmed that there was no significant group difference in age, ethnicity, race, sex, and years of education following the propensity match. Fibromyalgia patients had higher comorbidity scores on American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA) <jats:italic>(p=</jats:italic> 0.003). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant group difference in TCT for both command [F(1,637)= 5.13, p= 0.024, d=0.178] and copy conditions [F(1,466)= 4.03, <jats:italic>p=</jats:italic> 0.045, d=0.179j. Controlling for ASA, a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that groups still differed in TCT in the command condition [F(1,630)= 4.21, p= 0.041, n<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>= 0.007; Fibromyalgia &gt; Non-Fibromyalgia], but not in the copy condition.Conclusions:In our sample, older adults with fibromyalgia showed slower TCT to command by approximately three seconds compared to non-fibromyalgia peers. Since TCT to command taps into multiple domains of cognitive functioning, our results are consistent with previous work demonstrating poorer performance across many cognitive domains in fibromyalgia. Future research should continue investigating digital cognitive assessments to identify older adults with fibromyalgia who may be at higher risk for cognitive change. Data acquired through NIH R01 AG055337.","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"59 A Preliminary Investigation of Digital Clock Drawing in Fibromyalgia Patients Versus Non-Fibromyalgia Peers\",\"authors\":\"Yonah Joffe, Catherine Dion, Emily F Matusz, Shawna Amini, Patrick J Tighe, Michael E Robinson, Catherine Price\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1355617723009177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective:Widespread musculoskeletal pain disorders like fibromyalgia are often accompanied by varying levels of cognitive dysfunction. Fibromyalgia research suggests that around the time of diagnosis, typically 30-50 years of age, many patients are already showing cognitive difficulties on various neuropsychological assessments. It is unknown, however, how older adults with fibromyalgia perform on rapid cognitive screeners in clinical settings. The present study compared older adults with and without fibromyalgia on a digitized version of a classic neuropsychological screener, the clock drawing test.Participants and Methods:Participants aged 65+ were recruited as part of a larger IRB-approved and federally funded investigation within the preoperative surgical center at the University of Florida (UF) and UF Health. Participant data were obtained with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) waiver and honest broker medical extraction from January 2018 to December 2019 (N=14,807). Based on medical record diagnostic code, participants were categorized into fibromyalgia or non-fibromyalgia groups, then propensity score matched based on age, ethnicity, race, sex, and years of education. The final sample contained 718 older adults (mean age= 71.3±4.89, education years= 13.7±2.62, female= 98.1%, white= 87.9%) (n=359 in each group). All participants completed the command and copy condition of the digital Clock Drawing Test (dCDT). Variables of interest for both conditions included: total completion time (TCT), pre-first hand latency (PFHL), clock face area (CFA), and digit misplacement. These variables were chosen to represent two latency and two graphomotor variables. A natural log transformation was applied to all dCDT variables to achieve normality of the distribution.Results:We confirmed that there was no significant group difference in age, ethnicity, race, sex, and years of education following the propensity match. Fibromyalgia patients had higher comorbidity scores on American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA) <jats:italic>(p=</jats:italic> 0.003). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant group difference in TCT for both command [F(1,637)= 5.13, p= 0.024, d=0.178] and copy conditions [F(1,466)= 4.03, <jats:italic>p=</jats:italic> 0.045, d=0.179j. Controlling for ASA, a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that groups still differed in TCT in the command condition [F(1,630)= 4.21, p= 0.041, n<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>= 0.007; Fibromyalgia &gt; Non-Fibromyalgia], but not in the copy condition.Conclusions:In our sample, older adults with fibromyalgia showed slower TCT to command by approximately three seconds compared to non-fibromyalgia peers. Since TCT to command taps into multiple domains of cognitive functioning, our results are consistent with previous work demonstrating poorer performance across many cognitive domains in fibromyalgia. Future research should continue investigating digital cognitive assessments to identify older adults with fibromyalgia who may be at higher risk for cognitive change. Data acquired through NIH R01 AG055337.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617723009177\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617723009177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:纤维肌痛等广泛性肌肉骨骼疼痛疾病通常伴有不同程度的认知功能障碍。纤维肌痛的研究表明,在确诊时(通常为 30-50 岁),许多患者已经在各种神经心理学评估中表现出认知困难。然而,患有纤维肌痛的老年人在临床环境中的快速认知筛查中表现如何,尚不得而知。本研究比较了患有和未患有纤维肌痛的老年人在经典神经心理筛选器--时钟画图测试--的数字化版本上的表现。参与者和方法:本研究招募了 65 岁以上的参与者,作为佛罗里达大学(UF)和 UF Health 术前外科中心经 IRB 批准并由联邦政府资助的大型调查的一部分。2018年1月至2019年12月期间(N=14,807),通过《健康保险可携性和责任法案》(HIPAA)豁免和诚实经纪人医疗提取获得了参与者数据。根据病历诊断代码,将参与者分为纤维肌痛组和非纤维肌痛组,然后根据年龄、民族、种族、性别和受教育年限进行倾向得分匹配。最终样本包含 718 名老年人(平均年龄= 71.3±4.89,受教育年限= 13.7±2.62,女性= 98.1%,白人= 87.9%)(每组人数=359)。所有参与者都完成了数字时钟绘图测验(dCDT)的指令和复制条件。两种条件下的相关变量包括:总完成时间(TCT)、第一手前潜伏期(PFHL)、钟面面积(CFA)和数位错位。选择这些变量是为了代表两个潜伏期和两个图形运动变量。对所有 dCDT 变量进行了自然对数转换,以实现正态分布。结果:我们证实,在倾向匹配后,年龄、民族、种族、性别和受教育年限没有明显的群体差异。纤维肌痛患者在美国麻醉医师协会分类(ASA)中的合并症得分更高(P= 0.003)。方差分析(ANOVA)显示,命令[F(1,637)= 5.13, p= 0.024, d=0.178]和复制条件[F(1,466)= 4.03, p= 0.045, d=0.179j]的TCT存在显著的组间差异。结论:在我们的样本中,患有纤维肌痛的老年人与非纤维肌痛的同龄人相比,对指令的TCT反应慢了约3秒钟。由于 TCT 命令反应涉及多个认知功能领域,我们的研究结果与之前的研究结果一致,即纤维肌痛患者在多个认知领域的表现较差。未来的研究应继续调查数字认知评估,以确定哪些患有纤维肌痛的老年人可能面临较高的认知变化风险。数据通过美国国立卫生研究院 R01 AG055337 获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
59 A Preliminary Investigation of Digital Clock Drawing in Fibromyalgia Patients Versus Non-Fibromyalgia Peers
Objective:Widespread musculoskeletal pain disorders like fibromyalgia are often accompanied by varying levels of cognitive dysfunction. Fibromyalgia research suggests that around the time of diagnosis, typically 30-50 years of age, many patients are already showing cognitive difficulties on various neuropsychological assessments. It is unknown, however, how older adults with fibromyalgia perform on rapid cognitive screeners in clinical settings. The present study compared older adults with and without fibromyalgia on a digitized version of a classic neuropsychological screener, the clock drawing test.Participants and Methods:Participants aged 65+ were recruited as part of a larger IRB-approved and federally funded investigation within the preoperative surgical center at the University of Florida (UF) and UF Health. Participant data were obtained with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) waiver and honest broker medical extraction from January 2018 to December 2019 (N=14,807). Based on medical record diagnostic code, participants were categorized into fibromyalgia or non-fibromyalgia groups, then propensity score matched based on age, ethnicity, race, sex, and years of education. The final sample contained 718 older adults (mean age= 71.3±4.89, education years= 13.7±2.62, female= 98.1%, white= 87.9%) (n=359 in each group). All participants completed the command and copy condition of the digital Clock Drawing Test (dCDT). Variables of interest for both conditions included: total completion time (TCT), pre-first hand latency (PFHL), clock face area (CFA), and digit misplacement. These variables were chosen to represent two latency and two graphomotor variables. A natural log transformation was applied to all dCDT variables to achieve normality of the distribution.Results:We confirmed that there was no significant group difference in age, ethnicity, race, sex, and years of education following the propensity match. Fibromyalgia patients had higher comorbidity scores on American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA) (p= 0.003). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant group difference in TCT for both command [F(1,637)= 5.13, p= 0.024, d=0.178] and copy conditions [F(1,466)= 4.03, p= 0.045, d=0.179j. Controlling for ASA, a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that groups still differed in TCT in the command condition [F(1,630)= 4.21, p= 0.041, n2= 0.007; Fibromyalgia > Non-Fibromyalgia], but not in the copy condition.Conclusions:In our sample, older adults with fibromyalgia showed slower TCT to command by approximately three seconds compared to non-fibromyalgia peers. Since TCT to command taps into multiple domains of cognitive functioning, our results are consistent with previous work demonstrating poorer performance across many cognitive domains in fibromyalgia. Future research should continue investigating digital cognitive assessments to identify older adults with fibromyalgia who may be at higher risk for cognitive change. Data acquired through NIH R01 AG055337.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
期刊最新文献
Adherence to high-frequency ecological momentary assessment in persons with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. The Grenada Learning and Memory Scale: Psychometric features and normative data in Caribbean preschool children. Beyond brain injury: Examining the neuropsychological and psychosocial sequelae of post-traumatic epilepsy. Psychometric and adherence considerations for high-frequency, smartphone-based cognitive screening protocols in older adults. Comparing and linking the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1