{"title":"亚里士多德《诗学》的最后一章","authors":"Stavros Tsitsiridis","doi":"10.1163/1568525x-bja10237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the following close examination of chapter 26 of Aristotle’s <em>Poetics</em> it is argued (<em>a</em>) that unlike the main part of the treatise, tragedy and epic are no longer compared in the frame of ‘poetic art’, i.e. as literary genres, but rather as <em>Gesamtkunstwerke</em> judged by elitist criteria; (<em>b</em>) that the chapter adopts a logical method of argumentation founded on the dialectical method of the <em>Topics</em>; (<em>c</em>) that, as at the end of Book 8 of the <em>Politics</em>, it mainly reflects disputes in the Academy instigated by the so-called ‘New Music’; (<em>d</em>) that for a variety of reasons this chapter of the <em>Poetics</em> and hence the earlier layer of the treatise dates back to Aristotle’s first Athenian period (367-347 <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">BCE</span>).</p>","PeriodicalId":46134,"journal":{"name":"MNEMOSYNE","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Final Chapter of Aristotle’s Poetics\",\"authors\":\"Stavros Tsitsiridis\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/1568525x-bja10237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the following close examination of chapter 26 of Aristotle’s <em>Poetics</em> it is argued (<em>a</em>) that unlike the main part of the treatise, tragedy and epic are no longer compared in the frame of ‘poetic art’, i.e. as literary genres, but rather as <em>Gesamtkunstwerke</em> judged by elitist criteria; (<em>b</em>) that the chapter adopts a logical method of argumentation founded on the dialectical method of the <em>Topics</em>; (<em>c</em>) that, as at the end of Book 8 of the <em>Politics</em>, it mainly reflects disputes in the Academy instigated by the so-called ‘New Music’; (<em>d</em>) that for a variety of reasons this chapter of the <em>Poetics</em> and hence the earlier layer of the treatise dates back to Aristotle’s first Athenian period (367-347 <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">BCE</span>).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MNEMOSYNE\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MNEMOSYNE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-bja10237\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MNEMOSYNE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-bja10237","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
In the following close examination of chapter 26 of Aristotle’s Poetics it is argued (a) that unlike the main part of the treatise, tragedy and epic are no longer compared in the frame of ‘poetic art’, i.e. as literary genres, but rather as Gesamtkunstwerke judged by elitist criteria; (b) that the chapter adopts a logical method of argumentation founded on the dialectical method of the Topics; (c) that, as at the end of Book 8 of the Politics, it mainly reflects disputes in the Academy instigated by the so-called ‘New Music’; (d) that for a variety of reasons this chapter of the Poetics and hence the earlier layer of the treatise dates back to Aristotle’s first Athenian period (367-347 BCE).
期刊介绍：
Since its first appearance as a journal of textual criticism in 1852, Mnemosyne has secured a position as one of the leading journals in its field worldwide. Its reputation is built on the Dutch academic tradition, famous for its rigour and thoroughness. It attracts contributions from all over the world, with the result that Mnemosyne is distinctive for a combination of scholarly approaches from both sides of the Atlantic and the Equator. Its presence in libraries around the globe is a sign of its continued reputation as an invaluable resource for scholarship in Classical studies.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
