旧教徒新闻作品汇编

IF 0.4 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI:10.1134/s1019331623070146
L. V. Titova
{"title":"旧教徒新闻作品汇编","authors":"L. V. Titova","doi":"10.1134/s1019331623070146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>Old Believer writers from first-generation opponents of church reform created socially significant works in defense of Russian Church traditions. They present as evidence excerpts from authoritative manuscripts and early printed books testifying to the validity of the defended opinion on innovation. Based on these authoritative works, at the end of the 17th–first quarter of the 18th centuries, new texts began to be compiled, representing a summary of the fundamentals of the doctrine. Analysis of the content of several compilations made it possible to form an idea concerning the purpose of referring to works by the leaders of the first-generation Old Believers. It is shown that the compilers, when using source texts, borrowed and briefly outlined the main arguments in favor of the defended point of view on the reformers’ innovations that violated the traditions of Russian Orthodoxy. However, the focus was on fragments from works by the leaders of the opposition to church reform, in which the current time was characterized as the “kingdom of the Antichrist.” The main theme in the compilations is the assertion of the onset of “the last times” and a warning to powerful tormentors. The authors of the compilations managed to show to “pious readers” the cruelty and inhumanity of the authorities, both ecclesiastical and secular, and the massive scale of executions and persecution of Old Believers. This article uses documentary material to show the secular and church authorities’ assessment of Old Believer journalism and their attitude to it. They understood the danger and propaganda significance of journalistic texts in defense of the “Old Belief,” so they reacted sharply to them, intensifying the persecution of the disseminators of the Old Believer teachings. It is concluded that the compilation texts of the late 17th–first quarter of the 18th centuries that used the writings of the leaders of the first generation of opponents of church reform had a significant influence on the formation of a broad religious and social movement, which researchers call the <i>Old Believers</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":56335,"journal":{"name":"Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compilation Works in Old Believer Journalism\",\"authors\":\"L. V. Titova\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/s1019331623070146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Abstract</h3><p>Old Believer writers from first-generation opponents of church reform created socially significant works in defense of Russian Church traditions. They present as evidence excerpts from authoritative manuscripts and early printed books testifying to the validity of the defended opinion on innovation. Based on these authoritative works, at the end of the 17th–first quarter of the 18th centuries, new texts began to be compiled, representing a summary of the fundamentals of the doctrine. Analysis of the content of several compilations made it possible to form an idea concerning the purpose of referring to works by the leaders of the first-generation Old Believers. It is shown that the compilers, when using source texts, borrowed and briefly outlined the main arguments in favor of the defended point of view on the reformers’ innovations that violated the traditions of Russian Orthodoxy. However, the focus was on fragments from works by the leaders of the opposition to church reform, in which the current time was characterized as the “kingdom of the Antichrist.” The main theme in the compilations is the assertion of the onset of “the last times” and a warning to powerful tormentors. The authors of the compilations managed to show to “pious readers” the cruelty and inhumanity of the authorities, both ecclesiastical and secular, and the massive scale of executions and persecution of Old Believers. This article uses documentary material to show the secular and church authorities’ assessment of Old Believer journalism and their attitude to it. They understood the danger and propaganda significance of journalistic texts in defense of the “Old Belief,” so they reacted sharply to them, intensifying the persecution of the disseminators of the Old Believer teachings. It is concluded that the compilation texts of the late 17th–first quarter of the 18th centuries that used the writings of the leaders of the first generation of opponents of church reform had a significant influence on the formation of a broad religious and social movement, which researchers call the <i>Old Believers</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331623070146\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331623070146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 来自第一代教会改革反对者的老信徒作家们创作了具有重要社会意义的作品来捍卫俄罗斯教会传统。他们从权威手稿和早期印刷书籍中摘录部分内容作为证据,证明所捍卫的革新观点是正确的。在这些权威著作的基础上,17 世纪末至 18 世纪第一季度开始编纂新的文本,作为教义基础的总结。通过对几部汇编的内容进行分析,可以了解到参考第一代旧教徒领袖著作的目的。结果表明,编纂者在使用原始文本时,借用并简要概述了主要论据,以支持对改革者违反俄罗斯东正教传统的创新所持的观点。不过,重点是反对教会改革的领导人的作品片段,其中将当前时代描述为 "敌基督的王国"。汇编的主题是断言 "末世 "的来临,并对强大的折磨者发出警告。汇编的作者设法向 "虔诚的读者 "展示教会和世俗当局的残忍和不人道,以及对旧教徒的大规模处决和迫害。本文利用文献资料展示了世俗和教会当局对旧教徒新闻报道的评价及其态度。他们了解为 "旧信仰 "辩护的新闻报道的危险性和宣传意义,因此对这些报道做出了强烈反应,加强了对旧信仰教义传播者的迫害。结论是,17 世纪末至 18 世纪第一季度使用第一代教会改革反对者领袖著作的汇编文本对一场广泛的宗教和社会运动的形成产生了重大影响,研究人员称之为 "旧教徒"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Compilation Works in Old Believer Journalism

Abstract

Old Believer writers from first-generation opponents of church reform created socially significant works in defense of Russian Church traditions. They present as evidence excerpts from authoritative manuscripts and early printed books testifying to the validity of the defended opinion on innovation. Based on these authoritative works, at the end of the 17th–first quarter of the 18th centuries, new texts began to be compiled, representing a summary of the fundamentals of the doctrine. Analysis of the content of several compilations made it possible to form an idea concerning the purpose of referring to works by the leaders of the first-generation Old Believers. It is shown that the compilers, when using source texts, borrowed and briefly outlined the main arguments in favor of the defended point of view on the reformers’ innovations that violated the traditions of Russian Orthodoxy. However, the focus was on fragments from works by the leaders of the opposition to church reform, in which the current time was characterized as the “kingdom of the Antichrist.” The main theme in the compilations is the assertion of the onset of “the last times” and a warning to powerful tormentors. The authors of the compilations managed to show to “pious readers” the cruelty and inhumanity of the authorities, both ecclesiastical and secular, and the massive scale of executions and persecution of Old Believers. This article uses documentary material to show the secular and church authorities’ assessment of Old Believer journalism and their attitude to it. They understood the danger and propaganda significance of journalistic texts in defense of the “Old Belief,” so they reacted sharply to them, intensifying the persecution of the disseminators of the Old Believer teachings. It is concluded that the compilation texts of the late 17th–first quarter of the 18th centuries that used the writings of the leaders of the first generation of opponents of church reform had a significant influence on the formation of a broad religious and social movement, which researchers call the Old Believers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
141
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences provides a broad coverage of the Russian Academy of Sciences’ activities. It publishes original works, surveys, speeches, and discussions with participation of the members of Russian Academy of Sciences, leading scientists in Russia and worldwide and presents various viewpoints on important subjects related to all fields of science. The journal addresses the questions of scientist’s role in society and the role of scientific knowledge in the modern world.
期刊最新文献
The “Nuclear Winter” Hypothesis and a Responsible Nuclear Policy Medical Services of Russia, France, and Britain in the Crimean War, 1853–1856 The Topical Past: Instrumentalization of the Historical Memory of 1812 during the Crimean War of 1853–1856 B.N. Chicherin: The Crimean War as a Reflection of the Crisis of the Russian Empire The Crimean War and the Kingdom of Sardinia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1