本质性高血压患者的腹主动脉钙和几何形状

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.diii.2023.12.005
Damian Craiem , Federico Guilenea , Jean-Batiste de Freminville , Michel Azizi , Mariano E. Casciaro , Umit Gencer , Anne-Sophie Jannot , Laurence Amar , Gilles Soulat , Elie Mousseaux
{"title":"本质性高血压患者的腹主动脉钙和几何形状","authors":"Damian Craiem ,&nbsp;Federico Guilenea ,&nbsp;Jean-Batiste de Freminville ,&nbsp;Michel Azizi ,&nbsp;Mariano E. Casciaro ,&nbsp;Umit Gencer ,&nbsp;Anne-Sophie Jannot ,&nbsp;Laurence Amar ,&nbsp;Gilles Soulat ,&nbsp;Elie Mousseaux","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2023.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Abdominal aorta calcium (AAC) burden and dilatation are associated with an increased risk of mortality. The purpose of this study was to investigate determinants of AAC and abdominal aorta size in patients with essential hypertension.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension who had undergone non-enhanced abdominal CT to rule out secondary hypertension in addition to biological test were recruited between 2010 and 2018. A semi-automatic system was designed to estimate the aortic size (diameter, length, volume) and quantify the AAC from mesenteric artery to bifurcation using the Agatston score. Determinants of aortic size and those related to AAC were searched for using uni- and multivariables analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Among 293 randomly selected patients with hypertension (age 52 ± 11 [SD] years) included, 23% had resistant hypertension. Mean abdominal aorta diameter was 20.1 ± 2.1 (SD) mm. Eight (3%) patients had abdominal aorta aneurysm ≥ 30 mm and 58 (20%) had dilated abdominal aorta ≥ 27 mm. Median AAC score was 38 and calcifications were detected in the infra- and supra-renal abdominal aortic portions in 59% and 26% of the patients, respectively. After adjustment for age, male sex and body surface area, abdominal aorta diameter was positively associated with diastolic blood pressure (</span><em>P</em> = 0.0019). Smoking was the single variable associated with calcified abdominal aorta (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) after adjustment for cofactors. In patients with calcifications of abdominal aorta, the score increased with smoking history (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), statins treatment (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), greater number of anti-hypertensive drugs (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), larger abdominal aorta (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) and greater systolic blood pressure (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Patients with resistant hypertension had more AAC in the supra-renal abdominal aorta portion than those without resistant hypertension (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In patients with essential hypertension, abdominal aorta dilation is related with diastolic blood pressure while AAC is associated with smoking history and resistant hypertension when located to the supra-renal abdominal aorta portion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abdominal aortic calcium and geometry in patients with essential hypertension\",\"authors\":\"Damian Craiem ,&nbsp;Federico Guilenea ,&nbsp;Jean-Batiste de Freminville ,&nbsp;Michel Azizi ,&nbsp;Mariano E. Casciaro ,&nbsp;Umit Gencer ,&nbsp;Anne-Sophie Jannot ,&nbsp;Laurence Amar ,&nbsp;Gilles Soulat ,&nbsp;Elie Mousseaux\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.diii.2023.12.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Abdominal aorta calcium (AAC) burden and dilatation are associated with an increased risk of mortality. The purpose of this study was to investigate determinants of AAC and abdominal aorta size in patients with essential hypertension.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension who had undergone non-enhanced abdominal CT to rule out secondary hypertension in addition to biological test were recruited between 2010 and 2018. A semi-automatic system was designed to estimate the aortic size (diameter, length, volume) and quantify the AAC from mesenteric artery to bifurcation using the Agatston score. Determinants of aortic size and those related to AAC were searched for using uni- and multivariables analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Among 293 randomly selected patients with hypertension (age 52 ± 11 [SD] years) included, 23% had resistant hypertension. Mean abdominal aorta diameter was 20.1 ± 2.1 (SD) mm. Eight (3%) patients had abdominal aorta aneurysm ≥ 30 mm and 58 (20%) had dilated abdominal aorta ≥ 27 mm. Median AAC score was 38 and calcifications were detected in the infra- and supra-renal abdominal aortic portions in 59% and 26% of the patients, respectively. After adjustment for age, male sex and body surface area, abdominal aorta diameter was positively associated with diastolic blood pressure (</span><em>P</em> = 0.0019). Smoking was the single variable associated with calcified abdominal aorta (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) after adjustment for cofactors. In patients with calcifications of abdominal aorta, the score increased with smoking history (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), statins treatment (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), greater number of anti-hypertensive drugs (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), larger abdominal aorta (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) and greater systolic blood pressure (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Patients with resistant hypertension had more AAC in the supra-renal abdominal aorta portion than those without resistant hypertension (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In patients with essential hypertension, abdominal aorta dilation is related with diastolic blood pressure while AAC is associated with smoking history and resistant hypertension when located to the supra-renal abdominal aorta portion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211568423002413\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211568423002413","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 腹主动脉钙(AAC)负荷和扩张与死亡风险增加有关。本研究的目的是调查原发性高血压患者腹主动脉钙化和腹主动脉大小的决定因素。材料和方法在 2010 年至 2018 年间招募了无并发症的原发性高血压患者,他们除了接受生物检测外,还接受了非增强腹部 CT 以排除继发性高血压。设计了一个半自动系统来估算主动脉大小(直径、长度、容积),并使用 Agatston 评分量化从肠系膜动脉到分叉处的 AAC。结果在随机抽取的 293 名高血压患者(年龄 52 ± 11 [SD] 岁)中,23% 患有抵抗性高血压。腹主动脉平均直径为 20.1 ± 2.1 (SD) mm。8名(3%)患者腹主动脉瘤≥30毫米,58名(20%)患者腹主动脉扩张≥27毫米。AAC 评分中位数为 38,分别有 59% 和 26% 的患者在肾下和肾上腹主动脉部分发现钙化。在对年龄、男性性别和体表面积进行调整后,腹主动脉直径与舒张压呈正相关(P = 0.0019)。在对辅助因素进行调整后,吸烟是与腹主动脉钙化相关的唯一变量(P < 0.001)。在腹主动脉钙化患者中,得分随着吸烟史(P <0.001)、他汀类药物治疗(P <0.01)、服用抗高血压药物次数增多(P <0.01)、腹主动脉增大(P <0.05)和收缩压升高(P <0.05)而增加。结论 在原发性高血压患者中,腹主动脉扩张与舒张压有关,而当腹主动脉AAC位于肾上主动脉部分时,则与吸烟史和原发性高血压有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abdominal aortic calcium and geometry in patients with essential hypertension

Purpose

Abdominal aorta calcium (AAC) burden and dilatation are associated with an increased risk of mortality. The purpose of this study was to investigate determinants of AAC and abdominal aorta size in patients with essential hypertension.

Materials and methods

Patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension who had undergone non-enhanced abdominal CT to rule out secondary hypertension in addition to biological test were recruited between 2010 and 2018. A semi-automatic system was designed to estimate the aortic size (diameter, length, volume) and quantify the AAC from mesenteric artery to bifurcation using the Agatston score. Determinants of aortic size and those related to AAC were searched for using uni- and multivariables analyses.

Results

Among 293 randomly selected patients with hypertension (age 52 ± 11 [SD] years) included, 23% had resistant hypertension. Mean abdominal aorta diameter was 20.1 ± 2.1 (SD) mm. Eight (3%) patients had abdominal aorta aneurysm ≥ 30 mm and 58 (20%) had dilated abdominal aorta ≥ 27 mm. Median AAC score was 38 and calcifications were detected in the infra- and supra-renal abdominal aortic portions in 59% and 26% of the patients, respectively. After adjustment for age, male sex and body surface area, abdominal aorta diameter was positively associated with diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.0019). Smoking was the single variable associated with calcified abdominal aorta (P < 0.001) after adjustment for cofactors. In patients with calcifications of abdominal aorta, the score increased with smoking history (P < 0.001), statins treatment (P < 0.01), greater number of anti-hypertensive drugs (P < 0.01), larger abdominal aorta (P < 0.05) and greater systolic blood pressure (P < 0.05). Patients with resistant hypertension had more AAC in the supra-renal abdominal aorta portion than those without resistant hypertension (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

In patients with essential hypertension, abdominal aorta dilation is related with diastolic blood pressure while AAC is associated with smoking history and resistant hypertension when located to the supra-renal abdominal aorta portion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
29.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
11 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging accepts publications originating from any part of the world based only on their scientific merit. The Journal focuses on illustrated articles with great iconographic topics and aims at aiding sharpening clinical decision-making skills as well as following high research topics. All articles are published in English. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging publishes editorials, technical notes, letters, original and review articles on abdominal, breast, cancer, cardiac, emergency, forensic medicine, head and neck, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, interventional, obstetric, pediatric, thoracic and vascular imaging, neuroradiology, nuclear medicine, as well as contrast material, computer developments, health policies and practice, and medical physics relevant to imaging.
期刊最新文献
CT features of tension neck subcutaneous emphysema (tension pneumocollum). Diagnostic and prognostic value of MRI-based Node-RADS for the assessment of regional lymph node metastasis in renal cell carcinoma. Evaluation of a deep learning-based software to automatically detect and quantify breast arterial calcifications on digital mammogram. Artificial intelligence for bone fracture detection: A promising tool but no substitute for human expertise. CT, MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1