封闭技术对两种硅酸三钙封闭剂牙本质小管渗透的影响:体外研究。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Australian Endodontic Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-25 DOI:10.1111/aej.12825
Emílio Henrique Rocha Gonçalves Ferreira DDS, MSc, César Augusto Perini Rosas DDS, MSc, Ana Grasiela da Silva Limoeiro DDS, MSc, PhD, Samuel Nogueira Lima DDS, MSc, Rafael Amado Silva DDS, MSc, Iris Nogueira Bincelli Seckler DDS, MSc, Alexandre Sigrist De Martin DDS, MSc, PhD, Wayne Martins Nascimento DDS, MSc, Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno DDS, MSc, PhD
{"title":"封闭技术对两种硅酸三钙封闭剂牙本质小管渗透的影响:体外研究。","authors":"Emílio Henrique Rocha Gonçalves Ferreira DDS, MSc,&nbsp;César Augusto Perini Rosas DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Ana Grasiela da Silva Limoeiro DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Samuel Nogueira Lima DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Rafael Amado Silva DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Iris Nogueira Bincelli Seckler DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Alexandre Sigrist De Martin DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Wayne Martins Nascimento DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno DDS, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1111/aej.12825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study was to assess by confocal laser microscope the depth of dentinal tubule penetration of two tricalcium silicate-based sealers promoted by two obturation techniques in curved canals compared with AHPlus. One hundred and twenty canals were divided into six groups (<i>n</i> = 20): BCSC-Bio-C Sealer (BC) and single-cone technique (SC); BCCW-BC and continuous condensation wave (CW); TFSC-Total Fill (TF) and SC; TFCW-TF and CW; AHSC-AH Plus (AH) and SC; AHCW-AH and CW. Data were analysed using the three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (<i>α</i> = 5%). Penetration depth was significantly greater for TFCW than TFSC and greater for AHCW than AHSC (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference between BCCW and BCSC (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The penetration of TF was significantly greater (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The CW technique promoted greater intratubular penetration, except for the BC sealer.</p>","PeriodicalId":55581,"journal":{"name":"Australian Endodontic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of obturation technique on dentinal tubule penetration of two tricalcium silicate–based sealers: Ex vivo study\",\"authors\":\"Emílio Henrique Rocha Gonçalves Ferreira DDS, MSc,&nbsp;César Augusto Perini Rosas DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Ana Grasiela da Silva Limoeiro DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Samuel Nogueira Lima DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Rafael Amado Silva DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Iris Nogueira Bincelli Seckler DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Alexandre Sigrist De Martin DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Wayne Martins Nascimento DDS, MSc,&nbsp;Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno DDS, MSc, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aej.12825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim of this study was to assess by confocal laser microscope the depth of dentinal tubule penetration of two tricalcium silicate-based sealers promoted by two obturation techniques in curved canals compared with AHPlus. One hundred and twenty canals were divided into six groups (<i>n</i> = 20): BCSC-Bio-C Sealer (BC) and single-cone technique (SC); BCCW-BC and continuous condensation wave (CW); TFSC-Total Fill (TF) and SC; TFCW-TF and CW; AHSC-AH Plus (AH) and SC; AHCW-AH and CW. Data were analysed using the three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (<i>α</i> = 5%). Penetration depth was significantly greater for TFCW than TFSC and greater for AHCW than AHSC (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference between BCCW and BCSC (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The penetration of TF was significantly greater (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The CW technique promoted greater intratubular penetration, except for the BC sealer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.12825\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.12825","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是通过激光共聚焦显微镜评估两种硅酸三钙基封闭剂的牙本质小管穿透深度,与 AHPlus 相比,两种封闭技术在弯曲根管中促进了硅酸三钙基封闭剂的穿透。120 根根管被分为六组(n = 20):BCSC-Bio-C封闭剂(BC)和单锥技术(SC);BCCW-BC和连续冷凝波(CW);TFSC-全填充(TF)和SC;TFCW-TF和CW;AHSC-AH Plus(AH)和SC;AHCW-AH和CW。数据分析采用三方方差分析和 Tukey 检验(α = 5%)。渗透深度 TFCW 明显大于 TFSC,AHCW 大于 AHSC(p 0.05)。TF 的穿透深度明显大于 AHSC(p 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of obturation technique on dentinal tubule penetration of two tricalcium silicate–based sealers: Ex vivo study

The aim of this study was to assess by confocal laser microscope the depth of dentinal tubule penetration of two tricalcium silicate-based sealers promoted by two obturation techniques in curved canals compared with AHPlus. One hundred and twenty canals were divided into six groups (n = 20): BCSC-Bio-C Sealer (BC) and single-cone technique (SC); BCCW-BC and continuous condensation wave (CW); TFSC-Total Fill (TF) and SC; TFCW-TF and CW; AHSC-AH Plus (AH) and SC; AHCW-AH and CW. Data were analysed using the three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 5%). Penetration depth was significantly greater for TFCW than TFSC and greater for AHCW than AHSC (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between BCCW and BCSC (p > 0.05). The penetration of TF was significantly greater (p < 0.05). The CW technique promoted greater intratubular penetration, except for the BC sealer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Endodontic Journal
Australian Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
99
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Endodontic Journal provides a forum for communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for all specialists and dentists with an interest in the morphology, physiology, and pathology of the human tooth, in particular the dental pulp, root and peri-radicular tissues. The Journal features regular clinical updates, research reports and case reports from authors worldwide, and also publishes meeting abstracts, society news and historical endodontic glimpses. The Australian Endodontic Journal is a publication for dentists in general and specialist practice devoted solely to endodontics. It aims to promote communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for those dentists who have a special interest in endodontics.
期刊最新文献
Autotransplantation of immature second premolar combined with alveolar ridge splitting: A long-term (6-year) follow-up case report. Comparative analysis of rotary versus manual instrumentation in paediatric pulpectomy procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Can ultrasonography be used to detect root perforation? An in vitro study. Fibre post removal using ultrasonic tips: A comparative in vitro study using different protocols. Acid-etching protocol for bioceramic cements: Evaluation of bond strength, compression and morphology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1