利用机器学习对前列腺癌患者进行治疗预测。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-26 DOI:10.1080/10255842.2023.2298364
Emre Alataş, Handan Tanyıldızı Kökkülünk, Hilal Tanyıldızı, Goksel Alcın
{"title":"利用机器学习对前列腺癌患者进行治疗预测。","authors":"Emre Alataş, Handan Tanyıldızı Kökkülünk, Hilal Tanyıldızı, Goksel Alcın","doi":"10.1080/10255842.2023.2298364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are various treatment modalities for prostate cancer, which has a high incidence. In this study, it is aimed to make predictions with machine learning in order to determine the optimal treatment option for prostate cancer patients. The study included 88 male patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Independent variables were determined as Gleason scores, biopsy, PSA, SUV<sub>max</sub>, and age. Prostate cancer treatments, which are dependent variables, were determined as hormone therapy(<i>n</i> = 30), radiotherapy(<i>n</i> = 28) and radiotherapy + hormone therapy(<i>n</i> = 30). Machine learning was carried out in the Python with SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost. Metrics such as accuracy, ROC curve, and AUC were used to evaluate the performance of multi-class predictions. The model with the highest number of successful predictions was the XGBoost. False negative rates for hormone therapy, radiotherapy, and radiotherapy + hormone therapy treatments were, respectively, 12.5, 33.3, and 0%. The accuracy values were computed as 0.61, 0.83, 0.83, 0.72 and 0.89 for SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost, respectively. The three features that had the greatest influence on the treatment model prediction for prostate cancer with XGBoost were biopsy, Gleason score (3 + 3), and PSA level, respectively. According to the AUC, ROC and accuracy, it was determined that the XGBoost was the model that made the best estimation of prostate cancer treatment. Among the variables biopsy, Gleason score, and PSA level are identified as key variables in prediction of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50640,"journal":{"name":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":"572-580"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment prediction with machine learning in prostate cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Emre Alataş, Handan Tanyıldızı Kökkülünk, Hilal Tanyıldızı, Goksel Alcın\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10255842.2023.2298364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are various treatment modalities for prostate cancer, which has a high incidence. In this study, it is aimed to make predictions with machine learning in order to determine the optimal treatment option for prostate cancer patients. The study included 88 male patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Independent variables were determined as Gleason scores, biopsy, PSA, SUV<sub>max</sub>, and age. Prostate cancer treatments, which are dependent variables, were determined as hormone therapy(<i>n</i> = 30), radiotherapy(<i>n</i> = 28) and radiotherapy + hormone therapy(<i>n</i> = 30). Machine learning was carried out in the Python with SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost. Metrics such as accuracy, ROC curve, and AUC were used to evaluate the performance of multi-class predictions. The model with the highest number of successful predictions was the XGBoost. False negative rates for hormone therapy, radiotherapy, and radiotherapy + hormone therapy treatments were, respectively, 12.5, 33.3, and 0%. The accuracy values were computed as 0.61, 0.83, 0.83, 0.72 and 0.89 for SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost, respectively. The three features that had the greatest influence on the treatment model prediction for prostate cancer with XGBoost were biopsy, Gleason score (3 + 3), and PSA level, respectively. According to the AUC, ROC and accuracy, it was determined that the XGBoost was the model that made the best estimation of prostate cancer treatment. Among the variables biopsy, Gleason score, and PSA level are identified as key variables in prediction of treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"572-580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2023.2298364\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2023.2298364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前列腺癌发病率高,治疗方法多种多样。本研究旨在利用机器学习进行预测,以确定前列腺癌患者的最佳治疗方案。研究对象包括 88 名确诊为前列腺癌的男性患者。自变量包括格里森评分、活检、PSA、SUVmax 和年龄。作为因变量的前列腺癌治疗方法被确定为激素疗法(n = 30)、放射疗法(n = 28)和放射疗法+激素疗法(n = 30)。在 Python 中使用 SVM、RF、DT、ETC 和 XGBoost 进行了机器学习。准确率、ROC 曲线和 AUC 等指标用于评估多类预测的性能。预测成功率最高的模型是 XGBoost。激素疗法、放疗和放疗+激素疗法的假阴性率分别为 12.5%、33.3% 和 0%。SVM、RF、DT、ETC 和 XGBoost 的准确率分别为 0.61、0.83、0.83、0.72 和 0.89。对 XGBoost 预测前列腺癌治疗模型影响最大的三个特征分别是活检、Gleason 评分(3 + 3)和 PSA 水平。根据AUC、ROC和准确率,可以确定XGBoost是对前列腺癌治疗做出最佳估计的模型。在这些变量中,活检、格里森评分和 PSA 水平被认为是预测治疗的关键变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment prediction with machine learning in prostate cancer patients.

There are various treatment modalities for prostate cancer, which has a high incidence. In this study, it is aimed to make predictions with machine learning in order to determine the optimal treatment option for prostate cancer patients. The study included 88 male patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Independent variables were determined as Gleason scores, biopsy, PSA, SUVmax, and age. Prostate cancer treatments, which are dependent variables, were determined as hormone therapy(n = 30), radiotherapy(n = 28) and radiotherapy + hormone therapy(n = 30). Machine learning was carried out in the Python with SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost. Metrics such as accuracy, ROC curve, and AUC were used to evaluate the performance of multi-class predictions. The model with the highest number of successful predictions was the XGBoost. False negative rates for hormone therapy, radiotherapy, and radiotherapy + hormone therapy treatments were, respectively, 12.5, 33.3, and 0%. The accuracy values were computed as 0.61, 0.83, 0.83, 0.72 and 0.89 for SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost, respectively. The three features that had the greatest influence on the treatment model prediction for prostate cancer with XGBoost were biopsy, Gleason score (3 + 3), and PSA level, respectively. According to the AUC, ROC and accuracy, it was determined that the XGBoost was the model that made the best estimation of prostate cancer treatment. Among the variables biopsy, Gleason score, and PSA level are identified as key variables in prediction of treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
179
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary aims of Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering are to provide a means of communicating the advances being made in the areas of biomechanics and biomedical engineering and to stimulate interest in the continually emerging computer based technologies which are being applied in these multidisciplinary subjects. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering will also provide a focus for the importance of integrating the disciplines of engineering with medical technology and clinical expertise. Such integration will have a major impact on health care in the future.
期刊最新文献
Functionally graded stem optimizes the fixed and sliding surface coupling mechanism. Towards a radiation free numerical modelling framework to predict spring assisted correction of scaphocephaly. A physiologically enhanced muscle spindle model: using a Hill-type model for extrafusal fibers as template for intrafusal fibers. Modeling and simulation credibility assessments of whole-body finite element computational models for use in NASA extravehicular activity applications. A fractional modeling approach for the transmission dynamics of measles with double-dose vaccination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1