Carlos Henrique Carvalhal Gasparelli DDS, MSc, Marília Fagury Videira Marceliano-Alves DDS, MSc, PhD, Luan Ferreira Bastos MSc, PhD, Ricardo Tadeu Lopes MSc, PhD, Ana Grasiela da Silva Limoeiro DDS, MSc, PhD, Wayne Martins Nascimento DDS, MSc, Luiz Meton Horta dos Santos DDS, MSc, Tchilalo Boukpessi DDS, MSc, PhD, Adriana de Jesus Soares DDS, MSc, PhD, Marcos Frozoni DDS, MSc, PhD
{"title":"使用不同灌洗方案分析 5.25% NaOCl 对牙本质小管的渗透：体外研究","authors":"Carlos Henrique Carvalhal Gasparelli DDS, MSc, Marília Fagury Videira Marceliano-Alves DDS, MSc, PhD, Luan Ferreira Bastos MSc, PhD, Ricardo Tadeu Lopes MSc, PhD, Ana Grasiela da Silva Limoeiro DDS, MSc, PhD, Wayne Martins Nascimento DDS, MSc, Luiz Meton Horta dos Santos DDS, MSc, Tchilalo Boukpessi DDS, MSc, PhD, Adriana de Jesus Soares DDS, MSc, PhD, Marcos Frozoni DDS, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1111/aej.12824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of the study was to investigate the 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) penetration into the dentinal tubules after different irrigation methods. Seventy canines were stained with 1% crystal violet and divided into groups (<i>n</i> = 20): GEC—EasyClean; GPUI—E1 Irrisonic ultrasonic insert; GXP—XP-Endo finisher; GPC—conventional irrigation and GNC—stained tooth without irrigation. Axial sections (16×) were assessed and irrigant penetration was quantified as a bleaching halo on the surface of the apical, middle and coronal third. In the apical third, GPUI promoted greater NaOCl penetration (<i>p</i> < 0.05). GXP was better than GEC (<i>p</i> < 0.05), as was GPC (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The GPUI and GXP groups were similar in the middle and coronal third (<i>p</i> > 0.05). GPUI and GXP showed better results than GEC (<i>p</i> < 0.05). GPUI was more effective in the apical third and like GXP in the cervical and middle third.</p>","PeriodicalId":55581,"journal":{"name":"Australian Endodontic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aej.12824","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the penetration of NaOCl 5.25% into dentinal tubules using different irrigation protocols: An ex vivo study\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Henrique Carvalhal Gasparelli DDS, MSc, Marília Fagury Videira Marceliano-Alves DDS, MSc, PhD, Luan Ferreira Bastos MSc, PhD, Ricardo Tadeu Lopes MSc, PhD, Ana Grasiela da Silva Limoeiro DDS, MSc, PhD, Wayne Martins Nascimento DDS, MSc, Luiz Meton Horta dos Santos DDS, MSc, Tchilalo Boukpessi DDS, MSc, PhD, Adriana de Jesus Soares DDS, MSc, PhD, Marcos Frozoni DDS, MSc, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aej.12824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The objective of the study was to investigate the 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) penetration into the dentinal tubules after different irrigation methods. Seventy canines were stained with 1% crystal violet and divided into groups (<i>n</i> = 20): GEC—EasyClean; GPUI—E1 Irrisonic ultrasonic insert; GXP—XP-Endo finisher; GPC—conventional irrigation and GNC—stained tooth without irrigation. Axial sections (16×) were assessed and irrigant penetration was quantified as a bleaching halo on the surface of the apical, middle and coronal third. In the apical third, GPUI promoted greater NaOCl penetration (<i>p</i> < 0.05). GXP was better than GEC (<i>p</i> < 0.05), as was GPC (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The GPUI and GXP groups were similar in the middle and coronal third (<i>p</i> > 0.05). GPUI and GXP showed better results than GEC (<i>p</i> < 0.05). GPUI was more effective in the apical third and like GXP in the cervical and middle third.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aej.12824\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.12824\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.12824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of the penetration of NaOCl 5.25% into dentinal tubules using different irrigation protocols: An ex vivo study
The objective of the study was to investigate the 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) penetration into the dentinal tubules after different irrigation methods. Seventy canines were stained with 1% crystal violet and divided into groups (n = 20): GEC—EasyClean; GPUI—E1 Irrisonic ultrasonic insert; GXP—XP-Endo finisher; GPC—conventional irrigation and GNC—stained tooth without irrigation. Axial sections (16×) were assessed and irrigant penetration was quantified as a bleaching halo on the surface of the apical, middle and coronal third. In the apical third, GPUI promoted greater NaOCl penetration (p < 0.05). GXP was better than GEC (p < 0.05), as was GPC (p > 0.05). The GPUI and GXP groups were similar in the middle and coronal third (p > 0.05). GPUI and GXP showed better results than GEC (p < 0.05). GPUI was more effective in the apical third and like GXP in the cervical and middle third.
期刊介绍：
The Australian Endodontic Journal provides a forum for communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for all specialists and dentists with an interest in the morphology, physiology, and pathology of the human tooth, in particular the dental pulp, root and peri-radicular tissues.
The Journal features regular clinical updates, research reports and case reports from authors worldwide, and also publishes meeting abstracts, society news and historical endodontic glimpses.
The Australian Endodontic Journal is a publication for dentists in general and specialist practice devoted solely to endodontics. It aims to promote communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for those dentists who have a special interest in endodontics.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
