Antoinette M. Landor , Virginia L. Ramseyer Winter , Idia Binitie Thurston , Jamie Chan , Nadia Craddock , Brianna A. Ladd , Tracy L. Tylka , Viren Swami , Laurel B. Watson , Sophia Choukas-Bradley
{"title":"社会结构-交错身体形象(SIBI)框架:了解白人至上主义在身体形象研究和实践中的影响","authors":"Antoinette M. Landor , Virginia L. Ramseyer Winter , Idia Binitie Thurston , Jamie Chan , Nadia Craddock , Brianna A. Ladd , Tracy L. Tylka , Viren Swami , Laurel B. Watson , Sophia Choukas-Bradley","doi":"10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.101674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>White supremacy and racial inequities have long pervaded psychological research, including body image scholarship and practice. The experiences of white, heterosexual, able-bodied, cisgender (predominantly college) women from wealthy, Westernized nations have been centered throughout body image research and practice, thereby perpetuating myths of invulnerability among racialized groups and casting white ideals and experiences as the standard by which marginalized bodies are compared. Body image is shaped by multiple axes of oppression that exist within systemic and structural systems, ultimately privileging certain bodies above others. In this position paper, we highlight how white supremacy has shaped body image research and practice. In doing so, we first review the history of body image research and explain how participant sampling, measurement, interpretive frameworks, and dissemination of research have upheld and reinforced white supremacy. Next, grounded in inclusivity and intersectionality, we advance the Sociostructural-Intersectional Body Image (SIBI) framework to more fully understand the body image experiences of those with racialized and minoritized bodies, while challenging and seeking to upend white supremacy in body image research and practice. We encourage other scholars to utilize the SIBI framework to better understand body inequities and the body image experiences of <em>all people, in all bodies.</em></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48312,"journal":{"name":"Body Image","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Sociostructural-Intersectional Body Image (SIBI) framework: Understanding the impact of white supremacy in body image research and practice\",\"authors\":\"Antoinette M. Landor , Virginia L. Ramseyer Winter , Idia Binitie Thurston , Jamie Chan , Nadia Craddock , Brianna A. Ladd , Tracy L. Tylka , Viren Swami , Laurel B. Watson , Sophia Choukas-Bradley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.101674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>White supremacy and racial inequities have long pervaded psychological research, including body image scholarship and practice. The experiences of white, heterosexual, able-bodied, cisgender (predominantly college) women from wealthy, Westernized nations have been centered throughout body image research and practice, thereby perpetuating myths of invulnerability among racialized groups and casting white ideals and experiences as the standard by which marginalized bodies are compared. Body image is shaped by multiple axes of oppression that exist within systemic and structural systems, ultimately privileging certain bodies above others. In this position paper, we highlight how white supremacy has shaped body image research and practice. In doing so, we first review the history of body image research and explain how participant sampling, measurement, interpretive frameworks, and dissemination of research have upheld and reinforced white supremacy. Next, grounded in inclusivity and intersectionality, we advance the Sociostructural-Intersectional Body Image (SIBI) framework to more fully understand the body image experiences of those with racialized and minoritized bodies, while challenging and seeking to upend white supremacy in body image research and practice. We encourage other scholars to utilize the SIBI framework to better understand body inequities and the body image experiences of <em>all people, in all bodies.</em></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Body Image\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Body Image\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144523002176\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Body Image","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144523002176","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
长期以来,白人至上和种族不平等一直充斥着心理学研究,包括身体形象的学术研究和实践。来自西方富裕国家的白人、异性恋、健全、顺性别(主要是大学生)女性的经历一直是整个身体形象研究和实践的中心,从而延续了种族化群体不堪一击的神话,并将白人的理想和经历作为比较边缘化身体的标准。身体形象是由存在于系统性和结构性体系中的多重压迫轴心塑造的,最终使某些身体享有高于其他身体的特权。在本立场文件中,我们强调了白人至上主义是如何塑造身体形象研究和实践的。为此,我们首先回顾了身体形象研究的历史,并解释了参与者抽样、测量、解释框架和研究传播是如何维护和强化白人至上主义的。接下来,我们以包容性和交叉性为基础,提出了社会结构-交叉性身体形象(SIBI)框架,以更全面地了解那些拥有种族化和少数群体身体的人的身体形象经历,同时挑战并寻求颠覆身体形象研究和实践中的白人至上主义。我们鼓励其他学者利用 SIBI 框架来更好地理解身体不平等以及所有人、所有身体的身体形象体验。
The Sociostructural-Intersectional Body Image (SIBI) framework: Understanding the impact of white supremacy in body image research and practice
White supremacy and racial inequities have long pervaded psychological research, including body image scholarship and practice. The experiences of white, heterosexual, able-bodied, cisgender (predominantly college) women from wealthy, Westernized nations have been centered throughout body image research and practice, thereby perpetuating myths of invulnerability among racialized groups and casting white ideals and experiences as the standard by which marginalized bodies are compared. Body image is shaped by multiple axes of oppression that exist within systemic and structural systems, ultimately privileging certain bodies above others. In this position paper, we highlight how white supremacy has shaped body image research and practice. In doing so, we first review the history of body image research and explain how participant sampling, measurement, interpretive frameworks, and dissemination of research have upheld and reinforced white supremacy. Next, grounded in inclusivity and intersectionality, we advance the Sociostructural-Intersectional Body Image (SIBI) framework to more fully understand the body image experiences of those with racialized and minoritized bodies, while challenging and seeking to upend white supremacy in body image research and practice. We encourage other scholars to utilize the SIBI framework to better understand body inequities and the body image experiences of all people, in all bodies.
期刊介绍:
Body Image is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality, scientific articles on body image and human physical appearance. Body Image is a multi-faceted concept that refers to persons perceptions and attitudes about their own body, particularly but not exclusively its appearance. The journal invites contributions from a broad range of disciplines-psychological science, other social and behavioral sciences, and medical and health sciences. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, theoretical and review papers, and science-based practitioner reports of interest. Dissertation abstracts are also published online, and the journal gives an annual award for the best doctoral dissertation in this field.