评估模型响应对城市排放变化的敏感性以支持减排战略

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Air Quality Atmosphere and Health Pub Date : 2023-12-26 DOI:10.1007/s11869-023-01469-z
Bertrand Bessagnet, Kees Cuvelier, Alexander de Meij, Alexandra Monteiro, Enrico Pisoni, Philippe Thunis, Angelos Violaris, Jonilda Kushta, Bruce R. Denby, Qing Mu, Eivind G. Wærsted, Marta G. Vivanco, Mark R. Theobald, Victoria Gil, Ranjeet S. Sokhi, Kester Momoh, Ummugulsum Alyuz, Rajasree VPM, Saurabh Kumar, Elissavet Bossioli, Georgia Methymaki, Darijo Brzoja, Velimir Milić, Arineh Cholakian, Romain Pennel, Sylvain Mailler, Laurent Menut, Gino Briganti, Mihaela Mircea, Claudia Flandorfer, Kathrin Baumann-Stanzer, Virginie Hutsemékers, Elke Trimpeneers
{"title":"评估模型响应对城市排放变化的敏感性以支持减排战略","authors":"Bertrand Bessagnet,&nbsp;Kees Cuvelier,&nbsp;Alexander de Meij,&nbsp;Alexandra Monteiro,&nbsp;Enrico Pisoni,&nbsp;Philippe Thunis,&nbsp;Angelos Violaris,&nbsp;Jonilda Kushta,&nbsp;Bruce R. Denby,&nbsp;Qing Mu,&nbsp;Eivind G. Wærsted,&nbsp;Marta G. Vivanco,&nbsp;Mark R. Theobald,&nbsp;Victoria Gil,&nbsp;Ranjeet S. Sokhi,&nbsp;Kester Momoh,&nbsp;Ummugulsum Alyuz,&nbsp;Rajasree VPM,&nbsp;Saurabh Kumar,&nbsp;Elissavet Bossioli,&nbsp;Georgia Methymaki,&nbsp;Darijo Brzoja,&nbsp;Velimir Milić,&nbsp;Arineh Cholakian,&nbsp;Romain Pennel,&nbsp;Sylvain Mailler,&nbsp;Laurent Menut,&nbsp;Gino Briganti,&nbsp;Mihaela Mircea,&nbsp;Claudia Flandorfer,&nbsp;Kathrin Baumann-Stanzer,&nbsp;Virginie Hutsemékers,&nbsp;Elke Trimpeneers","doi":"10.1007/s11869-023-01469-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The sensitivity of air quality model responses to modifications in input data (e.g. emissions, meteorology and boundary conditions) or model configurations is recognized as an important issue for air quality modelling applications in support of air quality plans. In the framework of FAIRMODE (Forum of Air Quality Modelling in Europe, https://fairmode.jrc.ec.europa.eu/) a dedicated air quality modelling exercise has been designed to address this issue. The main goal was to evaluate the magnitude and variability of air quality model responses when studying emission scenarios/projections by assessing the changes of model output in response to emission changes. This work is based on several air quality models that are used to support model users and developers, and, consequently, policy makers. We present the FAIRMODE exercise and the participating models, and provide an analysis of the variability of O<sub>3</sub> and PM concentrations due to emission reduction scenarios. The key novel feature, in comparison with other exercises, is that emission reduction strategies in the present work are applied and evaluated at urban scale over a large number of cities using new indicators such as the absolute potential, the relative potential and the absolute potency. The results show that there is a larger variability of concentration changes between models, when the emission reduction scenarios are applied, than for their respective baseline absolute concentrations. For ozone, the variability between models of absolute baseline concentrations is below 10%, while the variability of concentration changes (when emissions are similarly perturbed) exceeds, in some instances 100% or higher during episodes. Combined emission reductions are usually more efficient than the sum of single precursor emission reductions both for O<sub>3</sub> and PM. In particular for ozone, model responses, in terms of linearity and additivity, show a clear impact of non-linear chemistry processes. This analysis gives an insight into the impact of model’ sensitivity to emission reductions that may be considered when designing air quality plans and paves the way of more in-depth analysis to disentangle the role of emissions from model formulation for present and future air quality assessments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"17 4","pages":"681 - 706"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11869-023-01469-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the sensitivity of model responses to urban emission changes in support of emission reduction strategies\",\"authors\":\"Bertrand Bessagnet,&nbsp;Kees Cuvelier,&nbsp;Alexander de Meij,&nbsp;Alexandra Monteiro,&nbsp;Enrico Pisoni,&nbsp;Philippe Thunis,&nbsp;Angelos Violaris,&nbsp;Jonilda Kushta,&nbsp;Bruce R. Denby,&nbsp;Qing Mu,&nbsp;Eivind G. Wærsted,&nbsp;Marta G. Vivanco,&nbsp;Mark R. Theobald,&nbsp;Victoria Gil,&nbsp;Ranjeet S. Sokhi,&nbsp;Kester Momoh,&nbsp;Ummugulsum Alyuz,&nbsp;Rajasree VPM,&nbsp;Saurabh Kumar,&nbsp;Elissavet Bossioli,&nbsp;Georgia Methymaki,&nbsp;Darijo Brzoja,&nbsp;Velimir Milić,&nbsp;Arineh Cholakian,&nbsp;Romain Pennel,&nbsp;Sylvain Mailler,&nbsp;Laurent Menut,&nbsp;Gino Briganti,&nbsp;Mihaela Mircea,&nbsp;Claudia Flandorfer,&nbsp;Kathrin Baumann-Stanzer,&nbsp;Virginie Hutsemékers,&nbsp;Elke Trimpeneers\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11869-023-01469-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The sensitivity of air quality model responses to modifications in input data (e.g. emissions, meteorology and boundary conditions) or model configurations is recognized as an important issue for air quality modelling applications in support of air quality plans. In the framework of FAIRMODE (Forum of Air Quality Modelling in Europe, https://fairmode.jrc.ec.europa.eu/) a dedicated air quality modelling exercise has been designed to address this issue. The main goal was to evaluate the magnitude and variability of air quality model responses when studying emission scenarios/projections by assessing the changes of model output in response to emission changes. This work is based on several air quality models that are used to support model users and developers, and, consequently, policy makers. We present the FAIRMODE exercise and the participating models, and provide an analysis of the variability of O<sub>3</sub> and PM concentrations due to emission reduction scenarios. The key novel feature, in comparison with other exercises, is that emission reduction strategies in the present work are applied and evaluated at urban scale over a large number of cities using new indicators such as the absolute potential, the relative potential and the absolute potency. The results show that there is a larger variability of concentration changes between models, when the emission reduction scenarios are applied, than for their respective baseline absolute concentrations. For ozone, the variability between models of absolute baseline concentrations is below 10%, while the variability of concentration changes (when emissions are similarly perturbed) exceeds, in some instances 100% or higher during episodes. Combined emission reductions are usually more efficient than the sum of single precursor emission reductions both for O<sub>3</sub> and PM. In particular for ozone, model responses, in terms of linearity and additivity, show a clear impact of non-linear chemistry processes. This analysis gives an insight into the impact of model’ sensitivity to emission reductions that may be considered when designing air quality plans and paves the way of more in-depth analysis to disentangle the role of emissions from model formulation for present and future air quality assessments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"681 - 706\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11869-023-01469-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-023-01469-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-023-01469-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

空气质量模型响应对输入数据(如排放、气象和边界条件)或模型配置修改的敏感性被认为是支持空气质量计划的空气质量模型应用的一个重要问题。在 FAIRMODE(欧洲空气质量建模论坛,https://fairmode.jrc.ec.europa.eu/)框架内,设计了一项专门的空气质量建模活动来解决这一问题。主要目标是通过评估模型输出对排放变化的响应变化,评估空气质量模型在研究排放方案/预测时的响应幅度和可变性。这项工作基于几个空气质量模型,这些模型用于支持模型用户和开发人员,进而支持政策制定者。我们介绍了 FAIRMODE 工作和参与模型,并对减排方案导致的臭氧和可吸入颗粒物浓度变化进行了分析。与其他工作相比,本工作的主要新特点是在城市范围内使用绝对潜力、相对潜力和绝对效力等新指标对大量城市的减排战略进行应用和评估。结果表明,与各自的基线绝对浓度相比,在采用减排方案时,不同模型之间的浓度变化差异更大。就臭氧而言,不同模型之间绝对基线浓度的变异性低于 10%,而浓度变化的变异性(当排放量受到类似扰动时)超过了 100%,在某些情况下甚至更高。对于臭氧和可吸入颗粒物,综合减排通常比单一前体减排的总和更有效。特别是对于臭氧,模型响应在线性和相加性方面显示出非线性化学过程的明显影响。这项分析让我们深入了解了模型对减排的敏感性所产生的影响,在设计空气质量计划时可能会考虑到这一点,同时也为更深入的分析铺平了道路,以便在目前和未来的空气质量评估中将排放的作用与模型的制定区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of the sensitivity of model responses to urban emission changes in support of emission reduction strategies

The sensitivity of air quality model responses to modifications in input data (e.g. emissions, meteorology and boundary conditions) or model configurations is recognized as an important issue for air quality modelling applications in support of air quality plans. In the framework of FAIRMODE (Forum of Air Quality Modelling in Europe, https://fairmode.jrc.ec.europa.eu/) a dedicated air quality modelling exercise has been designed to address this issue. The main goal was to evaluate the magnitude and variability of air quality model responses when studying emission scenarios/projections by assessing the changes of model output in response to emission changes. This work is based on several air quality models that are used to support model users and developers, and, consequently, policy makers. We present the FAIRMODE exercise and the participating models, and provide an analysis of the variability of O3 and PM concentrations due to emission reduction scenarios. The key novel feature, in comparison with other exercises, is that emission reduction strategies in the present work are applied and evaluated at urban scale over a large number of cities using new indicators such as the absolute potential, the relative potential and the absolute potency. The results show that there is a larger variability of concentration changes between models, when the emission reduction scenarios are applied, than for their respective baseline absolute concentrations. For ozone, the variability between models of absolute baseline concentrations is below 10%, while the variability of concentration changes (when emissions are similarly perturbed) exceeds, in some instances 100% or higher during episodes. Combined emission reductions are usually more efficient than the sum of single precursor emission reductions both for O3 and PM. In particular for ozone, model responses, in terms of linearity and additivity, show a clear impact of non-linear chemistry processes. This analysis gives an insight into the impact of model’ sensitivity to emission reductions that may be considered when designing air quality plans and paves the way of more in-depth analysis to disentangle the role of emissions from model formulation for present and future air quality assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health. It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes. International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements. This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.
期刊最新文献
AIRQ HARMO21 special issue—PREFACE Long-term changes of surface ozone and ozone sensitivity over the North China Plain based on 2015–2021 satellite retrievals Developing a novel hybrid model based on deep neural networks and discrete wavelet transform algorithm for prediction of daily air temperature The impact of respirable dust exposure on lung function parameters of motorcycle taxi drivers in Bangkok and adjacent provinces, Thailand Ozone production sensitivity in the highland city of Lhasa: a comparative analysis with Beijing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1