红狐在涉禽繁殖地湿草地栖息地的移动生态学和最小密度估计

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY European Journal of Wildlife Research Pub Date : 2023-12-28 DOI:10.1007/s10344-023-01759-y
Tom A. Porteus, Mike J. Short, Andrew N. Hoodless, Jonathan C. Reynolds
{"title":"红狐在涉禽繁殖地湿草地栖息地的移动生态学和最小密度估计","authors":"Tom A. Porteus, Mike J. Short, Andrew N. Hoodless, Jonathan C. Reynolds","doi":"10.1007/s10344-023-01759-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The red fox (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>) is a widely distributed generalist meso-predator implicated in declines of wading bird populations. In the wet grassland habitats where waders breed, wildlife managers work to mitigate fox predation risk to waders during the nesting period through lethal and non-lethal control methods. However, limited knowledge on fox movement ecology in these habitats makes it difficult to design effective management strategies. We used GPS telemetry to understand fox home range size, daily activity and movement patterns, and how these metrics may vary among wet grassland sites with different management. We caught and GPS-tagged 35 foxes in the March–June wader nesting period on two wet grassland sites in central southern England; Britford during 2016/17 and Somerley during 2018/19. We estimated home range areas from location data using local convex hulls, and from these estimates we derived the minimum fox density at each site and year. Daily activity patterns and movement behaviour of each fox were obtained using both telemetry and trail camera data. Mean fox home range area at Britford (0.21 km<sup>2</sup>, SE = 0.025) was significantly smaller than at Somerley (0.68 km<sup>2</sup>, SE = 0.067), and estimated minimum densities were around four times higher (Britford = 10.6 foxes/km<sup>2</sup>, Somerley = 2.4 foxes/km<sup>2</sup>). Foxes were more active and moved faster during twilight and night hours, but both telemetry and camera data indicate they were also active for one-third of daylight hours. Distances moved per day were variable between foxes but generally smaller at Britford. We also found evidence for dispersal during spring, with movements of up to 19 km per day. Home ranges at both wet grassland sites were smaller than comparable sites elsewhere. These indicated foxes were living at exceptionally high densities at Britford, where there is no fox control, increased food availability and where waders no longer breed. Spatio-temporal movement patterns were closely related to home range metrics, with higher levels of fox activity at Somerley, where home ranges were larger. The movements of itinerant and dispersing foxes during the nesting period suggests that lethal control would need to be very intensive to be effective. The likely anthropogenic food subsidy of fox density at Britford suggests that controlling access to similar food resources would help reduce predation pressure on breeding waders.</p>","PeriodicalId":51044,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Wildlife Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Movement ecology and minimum density estimates of red foxes in wet grassland habitats used by breeding wading birds\",\"authors\":\"Tom A. Porteus, Mike J. Short, Andrew N. Hoodless, Jonathan C. Reynolds\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10344-023-01759-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The red fox (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>) is a widely distributed generalist meso-predator implicated in declines of wading bird populations. In the wet grassland habitats where waders breed, wildlife managers work to mitigate fox predation risk to waders during the nesting period through lethal and non-lethal control methods. However, limited knowledge on fox movement ecology in these habitats makes it difficult to design effective management strategies. We used GPS telemetry to understand fox home range size, daily activity and movement patterns, and how these metrics may vary among wet grassland sites with different management. We caught and GPS-tagged 35 foxes in the March–June wader nesting period on two wet grassland sites in central southern England; Britford during 2016/17 and Somerley during 2018/19. We estimated home range areas from location data using local convex hulls, and from these estimates we derived the minimum fox density at each site and year. Daily activity patterns and movement behaviour of each fox were obtained using both telemetry and trail camera data. Mean fox home range area at Britford (0.21 km<sup>2</sup>, SE = 0.025) was significantly smaller than at Somerley (0.68 km<sup>2</sup>, SE = 0.067), and estimated minimum densities were around four times higher (Britford = 10.6 foxes/km<sup>2</sup>, Somerley = 2.4 foxes/km<sup>2</sup>). Foxes were more active and moved faster during twilight and night hours, but both telemetry and camera data indicate they were also active for one-third of daylight hours. Distances moved per day were variable between foxes but generally smaller at Britford. We also found evidence for dispersal during spring, with movements of up to 19 km per day. Home ranges at both wet grassland sites were smaller than comparable sites elsewhere. These indicated foxes were living at exceptionally high densities at Britford, where there is no fox control, increased food availability and where waders no longer breed. Spatio-temporal movement patterns were closely related to home range metrics, with higher levels of fox activity at Somerley, where home ranges were larger. The movements of itinerant and dispersing foxes during the nesting period suggests that lethal control would need to be very intensive to be effective. The likely anthropogenic food subsidy of fox density at Britford suggests that controlling access to similar food resources would help reduce predation pressure on breeding waders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Wildlife Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Wildlife Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-023-01759-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Wildlife Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-023-01759-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

红狐(Vulpes vulpes)是一种广泛分布的中型食肉动物,与涉禽种群数量下降有一定关系。在涉禽繁殖的湿草地栖息地,野生动物管理者通过致命和非致命的控制方法来降低狐狸在筑巢期间对涉禽的捕食风险。然而,由于对狐狸在这些栖息地的活动生态了解有限,因此很难设计出有效的管理策略。我们使用 GPS 遥测技术来了解狐狸的家园范围大小、日常活动和移动模式,以及这些指标在不同管理的湿地草场中会有怎样的变化。我们在英格兰中南部的两个湿地草场(2016/17 年度的布里特福德和 2018/19 年度的索默雷)捕获了 35 只狐狸,并在 3 月至 6 月的鸻鹬筑巢期间对其进行了 GPS 标记。我们使用局部凸壳法根据位置数据估算了狐狸的活动范围,并根据这些估算得出了每个地点和年份的最小狐狸密度。通过遥测和跟踪相机数据,我们获得了每只狐狸的日常活动模式和移动行为。布里特福德的平均狐狸家园面积(0.21 平方公里,SE = 0.025)明显小于萨默雷(0.68 平方公里,SE = 0.067),而估计的最小密度则高出约四倍(布里特福德 = 10.6 只/平方公里,萨默雷 = 2.4 只/平方公里)。狐狸在黄昏和夜间更加活跃,移动速度更快,但遥测和照相机数据表明,它们在白天三分之一的时间里也很活跃。不同狐狸每天移动的距离不同,但在布里特福德,狐狸每天移动的距离一般较小。我们还发现了狐狸在春季分散活动的证据,每天的活动距离可达 19 公里。两处湿草地的狐群活动范围均小于其他地方的同类活动范围。这表明狐狸在布里特福德的生活密度特别高,因为那里没有狐狸控制,食物供应增加,而且鸻鹬类不再在那里繁殖。狐狸的时空移动模式与家园范围指标密切相关,在家园范围较大的索默雷,狐狸的活动水平较高。狐狸在筑巢期间的流动和分散表明,致命控制必须非常密集才能有效。布里特福德的狐狸密度可能是人为食物补贴,这表明控制类似食物资源的获取将有助于减少对繁殖鸻鹬的捕食压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Movement ecology and minimum density estimates of red foxes in wet grassland habitats used by breeding wading birds

The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is a widely distributed generalist meso-predator implicated in declines of wading bird populations. In the wet grassland habitats where waders breed, wildlife managers work to mitigate fox predation risk to waders during the nesting period through lethal and non-lethal control methods. However, limited knowledge on fox movement ecology in these habitats makes it difficult to design effective management strategies. We used GPS telemetry to understand fox home range size, daily activity and movement patterns, and how these metrics may vary among wet grassland sites with different management. We caught and GPS-tagged 35 foxes in the March–June wader nesting period on two wet grassland sites in central southern England; Britford during 2016/17 and Somerley during 2018/19. We estimated home range areas from location data using local convex hulls, and from these estimates we derived the minimum fox density at each site and year. Daily activity patterns and movement behaviour of each fox were obtained using both telemetry and trail camera data. Mean fox home range area at Britford (0.21 km2, SE = 0.025) was significantly smaller than at Somerley (0.68 km2, SE = 0.067), and estimated minimum densities were around four times higher (Britford = 10.6 foxes/km2, Somerley = 2.4 foxes/km2). Foxes were more active and moved faster during twilight and night hours, but both telemetry and camera data indicate they were also active for one-third of daylight hours. Distances moved per day were variable between foxes but generally smaller at Britford. We also found evidence for dispersal during spring, with movements of up to 19 km per day. Home ranges at both wet grassland sites were smaller than comparable sites elsewhere. These indicated foxes were living at exceptionally high densities at Britford, where there is no fox control, increased food availability and where waders no longer breed. Spatio-temporal movement patterns were closely related to home range metrics, with higher levels of fox activity at Somerley, where home ranges were larger. The movements of itinerant and dispersing foxes during the nesting period suggests that lethal control would need to be very intensive to be effective. The likely anthropogenic food subsidy of fox density at Britford suggests that controlling access to similar food resources would help reduce predation pressure on breeding waders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Wildlife Research focuses on all aspects of wildlife biology. Main areas are: applied wildlife ecology; diseases affecting wildlife population dynamics, conservation, economy or public health; ecotoxicology; management for conservation, hunting or pest control; population genetics; and the sustainable use of wildlife as a natural resource. Contributions to socio-cultural aspects of human-wildlife relationships and to the history and sociology of hunting will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Hunting bag statistics of wild mammals in Portugal (1989–2022): on the need to improve data report and compilation Observation of threatened pinyon jays Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus in the EU pet market as a potential additional threat Dietary differences in males and females of a strongly sexually dimorphic ungulate Understanding the patterns and predictors of human-elephant conflict in Tamil Nadu, India Two neotropical spotted felids in the Nevado de Toluca Volcano? The highest altitude records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1