在不同气候情景下,保护区网络可能不足以保护一个支离破碎的热带热点地区的鸟类多样性

IF 4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pecon.2023.12.002
Vinicius Tonetti , Fernanda Bocalini , Fabio Schunck , Maurício Humberto Vancine , Mariella Butti , Milton Ribeiro , Marco Pizo
{"title":"在不同气候情景下,保护区网络可能不足以保护一个支离破碎的热带热点地区的鸟类多样性","authors":"Vinicius Tonetti ,&nbsp;Fernanda Bocalini ,&nbsp;Fabio Schunck ,&nbsp;Maurício Humberto Vancine ,&nbsp;Mariella Butti ,&nbsp;Milton Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Marco Pizo","doi":"10.1016/j.pecon.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We identified the 30% most-important forest remnants for conservation in the Atlantic Forest domain in South America based on three bird diversity components: (1) overall species potential distribution, (2) potential distribution of threatened species, and (3) diversity of functional traits. We evaluated the extent of overlap among priority areas using the different approaches and analysed the efficiency of the current Protected Areas network at protecting biodiversity in current and potential future (2040 and 2080) climate scenarios. The overlap among the most important areas is low among the different bird diversity components in all climate scenarios, and few changes were found in priority areas between the current and future scenario. The proportion of species that reached the minimum amount of their distribution areas protected varied from zero to 4% depending on the climate scenario and the species conservation status (threatened or not). Priority areas based on the potential distribution of threatened species were less correlated to areas based on the overall species potential distribution than to functional traits in all climate scenarios, suggesting that there might be considerable differences between species composition and their functionalities. Our analyses point out the main regions where resources should be allocated to conservation of birds in a mega-biodiversity region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56034,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"22 1","pages":"Pages 63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064423000780/pdfft?md5=a52ed1046b7dd14398833114b01fd922&pid=1-s2.0-S2530064423000780-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Protected Areas network may be insufficient to protect bird diversity in a fragmented tropical hotspot under different climate scenarios\",\"authors\":\"Vinicius Tonetti ,&nbsp;Fernanda Bocalini ,&nbsp;Fabio Schunck ,&nbsp;Maurício Humberto Vancine ,&nbsp;Mariella Butti ,&nbsp;Milton Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Marco Pizo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecon.2023.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We identified the 30% most-important forest remnants for conservation in the Atlantic Forest domain in South America based on three bird diversity components: (1) overall species potential distribution, (2) potential distribution of threatened species, and (3) diversity of functional traits. We evaluated the extent of overlap among priority areas using the different approaches and analysed the efficiency of the current Protected Areas network at protecting biodiversity in current and potential future (2040 and 2080) climate scenarios. The overlap among the most important areas is low among the different bird diversity components in all climate scenarios, and few changes were found in priority areas between the current and future scenario. The proportion of species that reached the minimum amount of their distribution areas protected varied from zero to 4% depending on the climate scenario and the species conservation status (threatened or not). Priority areas based on the potential distribution of threatened species were less correlated to areas based on the overall species potential distribution than to functional traits in all climate scenarios, suggesting that there might be considerable differences between species composition and their functionalities. Our analyses point out the main regions where resources should be allocated to conservation of birds in a mega-biodiversity region.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 63-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064423000780/pdfft?md5=a52ed1046b7dd14398833114b01fd922&pid=1-s2.0-S2530064423000780-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064423000780\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064423000780","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们根据鸟类多样性的三个组成部分,确定了南美洲大西洋森林地区最重要的 30% 森林保护区:(1) 总体物种潜在分布;(2) 受威胁物种潜在分布;(3) 功能特征多样性。我们使用不同的方法评估了优先区域之间的重叠程度,并分析了当前保护区网络在当前和潜在的未来(2040 年和 2080 年)气候情景下保护生物多样性的效率。在所有气候情景下,鸟类多样性的不同组成部分中最重要区域之间的重叠程度都很低,而且在当前情景和未来情景之间,优先区域几乎没有变化。根据气候情景和物种保护状况(受威胁或不受威胁)的不同,达到其分布区最小保护量的物种比例从零到 4% 不等。在所有气候情景下,基于受威胁物种潜在分布的优先区域与基于整体物种潜在分布的区域的相关性低于与功能特征的相关性,这表明物种组成及其功能之间可能存在很大差异。我们的分析指出了特大生物多样性地区鸟类保护应分配资源的主要区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Protected Areas network may be insufficient to protect bird diversity in a fragmented tropical hotspot under different climate scenarios

We identified the 30% most-important forest remnants for conservation in the Atlantic Forest domain in South America based on three bird diversity components: (1) overall species potential distribution, (2) potential distribution of threatened species, and (3) diversity of functional traits. We evaluated the extent of overlap among priority areas using the different approaches and analysed the efficiency of the current Protected Areas network at protecting biodiversity in current and potential future (2040 and 2080) climate scenarios. The overlap among the most important areas is low among the different bird diversity components in all climate scenarios, and few changes were found in priority areas between the current and future scenario. The proportion of species that reached the minimum amount of their distribution areas protected varied from zero to 4% depending on the climate scenario and the species conservation status (threatened or not). Priority areas based on the potential distribution of threatened species were less correlated to areas based on the overall species potential distribution than to functional traits in all climate scenarios, suggesting that there might be considerable differences between species composition and their functionalities. Our analyses point out the main regions where resources should be allocated to conservation of birds in a mega-biodiversity region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation (PECON) is a scientific journal devoted to improving theoretical and conceptual aspects of conservation science. It has the main purpose of communicating new research and advances to different actors of society, including researchers, conservationists, practitioners, and policymakers. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation publishes original papers on biodiversity conservation and restoration, on the main drivers affecting native ecosystems, and on nature’s benefits to people and human wellbeing. This scope includes studies on biodiversity patterns, the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, biological invasion and climate change on biodiversity, conservation genetics, spatial conservation planning, ecosystem management, ecosystem services, sustainability and resilience of socio-ecological systems, conservation policy, among others.
期刊最新文献
Declining representation of imperiled Atlantic Forest birds in community-science datasets Climate influence on future suitability of high-altitude wetlands in two natural protected areas from the Central Andes of Argentina Is banning Persistent Organic Pollutants efficient? A quantitative and qualitative systematic review in bats Identifying priority conservation areas for the Andean Condor in Colombia Past references are insufficient for Latin American biodiversity conservation in the Anthropocene
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1