通过再生部位进行正畸牙齿移动:25 年系统回顾

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Seminars in Orthodontics Pub Date : 2023-12-26 DOI:10.1053/j.sodo.2023.12.003
Yehuda Klein , Michal Kimelman Silker , Avi Leibovich , David Polak , Ayala Stabholz , Nardy Casap , Stella Chaushu
{"title":"通过再生部位进行正畸牙齿移动:25 年系统回顾","authors":"Yehuda Klein ,&nbsp;Michal Kimelman Silker ,&nbsp;Avi Leibovich ,&nbsp;David Polak ,&nbsp;Ayala Stabholz ,&nbsp;Nardy Casap ,&nbsp;Stella Chaushu","doi":"10.1053/j.sodo.2023.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This systematic review aimed to investigate the efficacy of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) through bone regenerated with osteoconductive grafts, together with the risk of root resorption (RR), in relation to the material and the timing of force initiation. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, three major electronic databases were searched (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane). Only studies which reported on the primary outcome (OTM rate) were included. Investigations with fewer than 3 participants/groups and an absence of controls were excluded. The final sample consisted of 16 randomized and controlled clinical trials. Among them, 9 reported on RR (the secondary outcome). The articles showed substantial heterogeneity and low-moderate quality. Most studied OTM through alloplasts (7) and xenografts (8), 3 addressed allografts, 3 autografts and 6 analyzed 2 grafts. Timing for force initiation varied from 0 to 13 weeks post-grafting. Based on limited evidence, it can be cautiously concluded that most graft materials have either no impact or slightly impair OTM, with no significant increase in RR. Xenografts might impede OTM and increase RR risk. The optimal timing for force application depends on the state of bone healing. Future studies are mandatory for deciding on the ideal graft and timing for optimal OTM in each clinical setup.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48688,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Orthodontics","volume":"30 2","pages":"Pages 150-161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orthodontic tooth movement through regenerative sites: A 25-year systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Yehuda Klein ,&nbsp;Michal Kimelman Silker ,&nbsp;Avi Leibovich ,&nbsp;David Polak ,&nbsp;Ayala Stabholz ,&nbsp;Nardy Casap ,&nbsp;Stella Chaushu\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sodo.2023.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This systematic review aimed to investigate the efficacy of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) through bone regenerated with osteoconductive grafts, together with the risk of root resorption (RR), in relation to the material and the timing of force initiation. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, three major electronic databases were searched (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane). Only studies which reported on the primary outcome (OTM rate) were included. Investigations with fewer than 3 participants/groups and an absence of controls were excluded. The final sample consisted of 16 randomized and controlled clinical trials. Among them, 9 reported on RR (the secondary outcome). The articles showed substantial heterogeneity and low-moderate quality. Most studied OTM through alloplasts (7) and xenografts (8), 3 addressed allografts, 3 autografts and 6 analyzed 2 grafts. Timing for force initiation varied from 0 to 13 weeks post-grafting. Based on limited evidence, it can be cautiously concluded that most graft materials have either no impact or slightly impair OTM, with no significant increase in RR. Xenografts might impede OTM and increase RR risk. The optimal timing for force application depends on the state of bone healing. Future studies are mandatory for deciding on the ideal graft and timing for optimal OTM in each clinical setup.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 150-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874623001172\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874623001172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统性综述旨在研究通过骨诱导移植物再生的骨进行正畸牙齿移动(OTM)的疗效以及牙根吸收(RR)的风险,这与材料和开始加力的时机有关。根据 PRISMA-ScR 指南,我们检索了三大电子数据库(PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane)。只纳入了报告主要结果(OTM 率)的研究。参与者少于 3 人/组且没有对照组的研究被排除在外。最终样本包括 16 项随机对照临床试验。其中,9 项报告了 RR(次要结果)。这些文章显示出很大的异质性和中低质量。大多数文章研究了通过异体(7 篇)和异种(8 篇)进行的 OTM,3 篇研究了异体移植物,3 篇研究了自体移植物,6 篇分析了 2 种移植物。开始作用力的时间从移植后 0 周到 13 周不等。根据有限的证据,可以谨慎地得出结论:大多数移植物材料对 OTM 没有影响或有轻微影响,RR 没有显著增加。异种移植物可能会妨碍 OTM 并增加 RR 风险。施力的最佳时机取决于骨愈合的状态。今后的研究必须针对每种临床情况决定理想的移植物和最佳 OTM 时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Orthodontic tooth movement through regenerative sites: A 25-year systematic review

This systematic review aimed to investigate the efficacy of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) through bone regenerated with osteoconductive grafts, together with the risk of root resorption (RR), in relation to the material and the timing of force initiation. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, three major electronic databases were searched (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane). Only studies which reported on the primary outcome (OTM rate) were included. Investigations with fewer than 3 participants/groups and an absence of controls were excluded. The final sample consisted of 16 randomized and controlled clinical trials. Among them, 9 reported on RR (the secondary outcome). The articles showed substantial heterogeneity and low-moderate quality. Most studied OTM through alloplasts (7) and xenografts (8), 3 addressed allografts, 3 autografts and 6 analyzed 2 grafts. Timing for force initiation varied from 0 to 13 weeks post-grafting. Based on limited evidence, it can be cautiously concluded that most graft materials have either no impact or slightly impair OTM, with no significant increase in RR. Xenografts might impede OTM and increase RR risk. The optimal timing for force application depends on the state of bone healing. Future studies are mandatory for deciding on the ideal graft and timing for optimal OTM in each clinical setup.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Orthodontics
Seminars in Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
10 days
期刊介绍: Each issue provides up-to-date, state-of-the-art information on a single topic in orthodontics. Readers are kept abreast of the latest innovations, research findings, clinical applications and clinical methods. Collection of the issues will provide invaluable reference material for present and future review.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of geometric changes in basal arch form after maxillary expansion between pure bone-borne and tissue-bone-borne appliance Assessment of the readability of online orthodontic educational resources related to ‘orthodontic treatment’: A cross-sectional study Orthodontic education in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: Overview of programs and challenges The applications of digital technology in postgraduate orthodontic education Shaping the research agenda for dental sleep-disordered breathing education in orthodontic residency programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1