Marian I. Hamilton , Sandi R. Copeland , Sherry V. Nelson
{"title":"重新分析作为南非类人猿散布指标的锶同位素比率","authors":"Marian I. Hamilton , Sandi R. Copeland , Sherry V. Nelson","doi":"10.1016/j.jhevol.2023.103480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Dispersal patterns in primates have major implications for behavior and sociality but are difficult to reconstruct for fossil species. This study applies novel strontium isotope methodologies that have reliably predicted philopatry and dispersal patterns in chimpanzees and other modern primates to previously published strontium isotope ratios (</span><sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr) of two South African hominins, <em>Australopithecus africanus</em> and <em>Australopithecus robustus</em>. In this study, the difference or ‘offset’ was calculated between the <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr of each fossil tooth compared to local bioavailable <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr as defined by cluster analysis of modern plant isotope ratios. Large teeth (presumably belonging to males) have low offsets from local <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr proxies, while small teeth (presumably from females) have greater offsets from local <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr proxies. This supports previous conclusions of male philopatry and female dispersal in both <em>A. africanus</em> and <em>A. robustus</em>. Furthermore, <em>A. robustus</em> shows more extreme differences between presumed males and females compared to <em>A. africanus</em><span>. This is analogous to differences seen in modern olive baboons compared to chimpanzees and suggests that </span><em>A. africanus</em> may have had a larger home range than <em>A. robustus</em>. Neither hominin species has <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr consistent with riparian habitat preferences despite the demonstrated presence of riparian habitats in South Africa at the time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Evolution","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 103480"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A reanalysis of strontium isotope ratios as indicators of dispersal in South African hominins\",\"authors\":\"Marian I. Hamilton , Sandi R. Copeland , Sherry V. Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhevol.2023.103480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Dispersal patterns in primates have major implications for behavior and sociality but are difficult to reconstruct for fossil species. This study applies novel strontium isotope methodologies that have reliably predicted philopatry and dispersal patterns in chimpanzees and other modern primates to previously published strontium isotope ratios (</span><sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr) of two South African hominins, <em>Australopithecus africanus</em> and <em>Australopithecus robustus</em>. In this study, the difference or ‘offset’ was calculated between the <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr of each fossil tooth compared to local bioavailable <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr as defined by cluster analysis of modern plant isotope ratios. Large teeth (presumably belonging to males) have low offsets from local <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr proxies, while small teeth (presumably from females) have greater offsets from local <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr proxies. This supports previous conclusions of male philopatry and female dispersal in both <em>A. africanus</em> and <em>A. robustus</em>. Furthermore, <em>A. robustus</em> shows more extreme differences between presumed males and females compared to <em>A. africanus</em><span>. This is analogous to differences seen in modern olive baboons compared to chimpanzees and suggests that </span><em>A. africanus</em> may have had a larger home range than <em>A. robustus</em>. Neither hominin species has <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr consistent with riparian habitat preferences despite the demonstrated presence of riparian habitats in South Africa at the time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Evolution\",\"volume\":\"187 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248423001598\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248423001598","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A reanalysis of strontium isotope ratios as indicators of dispersal in South African hominins
Dispersal patterns in primates have major implications for behavior and sociality but are difficult to reconstruct for fossil species. This study applies novel strontium isotope methodologies that have reliably predicted philopatry and dispersal patterns in chimpanzees and other modern primates to previously published strontium isotope ratios (87Sr/86Sr) of two South African hominins, Australopithecus africanus and Australopithecus robustus. In this study, the difference or ‘offset’ was calculated between the 87Sr/86Sr of each fossil tooth compared to local bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr as defined by cluster analysis of modern plant isotope ratios. Large teeth (presumably belonging to males) have low offsets from local 87Sr/86Sr proxies, while small teeth (presumably from females) have greater offsets from local 87Sr/86Sr proxies. This supports previous conclusions of male philopatry and female dispersal in both A. africanus and A. robustus. Furthermore, A. robustus shows more extreme differences between presumed males and females compared to A. africanus. This is analogous to differences seen in modern olive baboons compared to chimpanzees and suggests that A. africanus may have had a larger home range than A. robustus. Neither hominin species has 87Sr/86Sr consistent with riparian habitat preferences despite the demonstrated presence of riparian habitats in South Africa at the time.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Human Evolution concentrates on publishing the highest quality papers covering all aspects of human evolution. The central focus is aimed jointly at paleoanthropological work, covering human and primate fossils, and at comparative studies of living species, including both morphological and molecular evidence. These include descriptions of new discoveries, interpretative analyses of new and previously described material, and assessments of the phylogeny and paleobiology of primate species. Submissions should address issues and questions of broad interest in paleoanthropology.