米兰唾液腺细胞病理学报告系统--实用性和恶性风险评估。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Indian journal of cancer Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.4103/ijc.IJC_158_21
Annu E Prakash, Renu Sukumaran, Nileena Nayak, K Lakshmi, Anitha Mathews, Jayasree Kattoor
{"title":"米兰唾液腺细胞病理学报告系统--实用性和恶性风险评估。","authors":"Annu E Prakash, Renu Sukumaran, Nileena Nayak, K Lakshmi, Anitha Mathews, Jayasree Kattoor","doi":"10.4103/ijc.IJC_158_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytological diagnosis of salivary gland lesions furnishes several challenges to pathologists and clinicians owing to their diverse morphology and varying reporting terminology. The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology was proposed to overcome these defects. The aim of this study was to grade histopathologically diagnosed cases of salivary gland pathology using Milan system and to correlate Milan system with histopathological diagnosis. The study aims to assess the utility of the Milan system and the risk of malignancy in each category.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of 4 years duration. All the cases of salivary gland pathology with fine-needle aspiration cytology findings from January 2015 to December 2018 were retrieved and classified according to the Milan system. Histopathology follow-up of these cases were reviewed from the archives, and risk of malignancy was calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated using histopathological diagnosis as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cytology slides of 151 cases were reviewed, and the Milan system was applied. Histopathology follow-up was obtained in 94 cases (attrition rate = 37.74%). The percentage of cases in each category were as follows: nondiagnostic = 9.27%, nonneoplastic = 4.64%, atypia of undetermined significance = 3.97%, benign neoplasm = 23.84%, neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential = 8.61%, suspicious for malignancy = 11.92%, and malignant = 37.75%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Milan system were 94.20%, 96.00%, 98.48%, and 85.71%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Milan system has high sensitivity and specificity in comparison with histopathology. This system proves helpful to the pathologist as well as the clinician in achieving uniformity of reporting terminology by classifying salivary gland lesions into subcategories with prognostic relevance.</p>","PeriodicalId":13505,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology - Assessment of utility and the risk of malignancy.\",\"authors\":\"Annu E Prakash, Renu Sukumaran, Nileena Nayak, K Lakshmi, Anitha Mathews, Jayasree Kattoor\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijc.IJC_158_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytological diagnosis of salivary gland lesions furnishes several challenges to pathologists and clinicians owing to their diverse morphology and varying reporting terminology. The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology was proposed to overcome these defects. The aim of this study was to grade histopathologically diagnosed cases of salivary gland pathology using Milan system and to correlate Milan system with histopathological diagnosis. The study aims to assess the utility of the Milan system and the risk of malignancy in each category.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of 4 years duration. All the cases of salivary gland pathology with fine-needle aspiration cytology findings from January 2015 to December 2018 were retrieved and classified according to the Milan system. Histopathology follow-up of these cases were reviewed from the archives, and risk of malignancy was calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated using histopathological diagnosis as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cytology slides of 151 cases were reviewed, and the Milan system was applied. Histopathology follow-up was obtained in 94 cases (attrition rate = 37.74%). The percentage of cases in each category were as follows: nondiagnostic = 9.27%, nonneoplastic = 4.64%, atypia of undetermined significance = 3.97%, benign neoplasm = 23.84%, neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential = 8.61%, suspicious for malignancy = 11.92%, and malignant = 37.75%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Milan system were 94.20%, 96.00%, 98.48%, and 85.71%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Milan system has high sensitivity and specificity in comparison with histopathology. This system proves helpful to the pathologist as well as the clinician in achieving uniformity of reporting terminology by classifying salivary gland lesions into subcategories with prognostic relevance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.IJC_158_21\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.IJC_158_21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于涎腺病变形态各异,报告术语也不尽相同,因此涎腺病变的细胞学诊断给病理学家和临床医生带来了诸多挑战。米兰唾液腺细胞病理学报告系统的提出就是为了克服这些缺陷。本研究的目的是使用米兰系统对组织病理学诊断的涎腺病理病例进行分级,并将米兰系统与组织病理学诊断相关联。研究旨在评估米兰系统的实用性以及每个类别的恶性肿瘤风险:这是一项为期 4 年的回顾性研究。检索了 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间所有细针穿刺细胞学检查结果为唾液腺病变的病例,并根据米兰系统进行分类。从档案中查阅了这些病例的组织病理学随访情况,并计算了恶性肿瘤的风险。以组织病理学诊断为金标准,计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值:结果:对 151 个病例的细胞学切片进行了审查,并采用了米兰系统。94例病例获得了组织病理学随访(自然减员率=37.74%)。各类病例的百分比如下:无诊断意义 = 9.27%,非肿瘤性 = 4.64%,不典型性意义不明 = 3.97%,良性肿瘤 = 23.84%,恶性可能性不确定的肿瘤 = 8.61%,可疑恶性肿瘤 = 11.92%,恶性肿瘤 = 37.75%。米兰系统的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 94.20%、96.00%、98.48% 和 85.71%:与组织病理学相比,米兰系统具有较高的灵敏度和特异性。通过将涎腺病变分为具有预后相关性的亚类,该系统有助于病理学家和临床医生实现报告术语的统一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology - Assessment of utility and the risk of malignancy.

Background: Cytological diagnosis of salivary gland lesions furnishes several challenges to pathologists and clinicians owing to their diverse morphology and varying reporting terminology. The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology was proposed to overcome these defects. The aim of this study was to grade histopathologically diagnosed cases of salivary gland pathology using Milan system and to correlate Milan system with histopathological diagnosis. The study aims to assess the utility of the Milan system and the risk of malignancy in each category.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of 4 years duration. All the cases of salivary gland pathology with fine-needle aspiration cytology findings from January 2015 to December 2018 were retrieved and classified according to the Milan system. Histopathology follow-up of these cases were reviewed from the archives, and risk of malignancy was calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated using histopathological diagnosis as the gold standard.

Results: Cytology slides of 151 cases were reviewed, and the Milan system was applied. Histopathology follow-up was obtained in 94 cases (attrition rate = 37.74%). The percentage of cases in each category were as follows: nondiagnostic = 9.27%, nonneoplastic = 4.64%, atypia of undetermined significance = 3.97%, benign neoplasm = 23.84%, neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential = 8.61%, suspicious for malignancy = 11.92%, and malignant = 37.75%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Milan system were 94.20%, 96.00%, 98.48%, and 85.71%, respectively.

Conclusion: The Milan system has high sensitivity and specificity in comparison with histopathology. This system proves helpful to the pathologist as well as the clinician in achieving uniformity of reporting terminology by classifying salivary gland lesions into subcategories with prognostic relevance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of cancer
Indian journal of cancer Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Cancer (ISSN 0019-509X), the show window of the progress of ontological sciences in India, was established in 1963. Indian Journal of Cancer is the first and only periodical serving the needs of all the specialties of oncology in India.
期刊最新文献
Carcinoma colon masquerading as bleeding per vagina. Gene of the month: C-KIT. Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients visiting the Palliative Care outpatient department in a tertiary care oncology centre in India. Introduction of HPV vaccine in universal immunization programme of India: A step in the right direction for the elimination of cervical cancer. Role of adaptive radiotherapy during concomitant chemoradiotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1