抗精神病药物透视:过去、现在和未来。

Q2 Medicine Senior Care Pharmacist Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4140/TCP.n.2024.5
Steven A Levenson
{"title":"抗精神病药物透视:过去、现在和未来。","authors":"Steven A Levenson","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For more than half a century, there has been controversy and conflict over using psychotropic medications (\"psychotropics\") as strategies to modulate behavior, enhance mood, and address cognitive issues for nursing home residents. The current situation reflects a long history of investigation, reports, discussions, government and professional activity, and other attempted improvement. Although attention has focused primarily on the use of antipsychotics, particularly to manage symptoms associated with dementia, there are much broader issues. The use of all psychotropics has arguably been challenging and inconsistent. Although antipsychotic use in nursing homes has been reduced substantially, many controversies and concerns remain, such as the continuing significant use of other psychotropics. It is tempting to conclude that efforts to reduce the use of these medications might have been deliberately stymied, and that more drastic-if not coercive-measures are needed to correct these issues. However, many other compelling considerations must be defined accurately and addressed. Further improvement in the current situation requires reconsidering some current beliefs and approaches. A pause and reopening of meaningful discussion is needed. This 3-part series (in this and the next 2 issues of <i>The Senior Care Pharmacist</i>) will examine the history of the issues (this month), various perspectives on the issues (part 2), and lessons and recommended approaches for the future (part 3).</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"39 1","pages":"5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antipsychotics in Perspective: Past, Present, and Future.\",\"authors\":\"Steven A Levenson\",\"doi\":\"10.4140/TCP.n.2024.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For more than half a century, there has been controversy and conflict over using psychotropic medications (\\\"psychotropics\\\") as strategies to modulate behavior, enhance mood, and address cognitive issues for nursing home residents. The current situation reflects a long history of investigation, reports, discussions, government and professional activity, and other attempted improvement. Although attention has focused primarily on the use of antipsychotics, particularly to manage symptoms associated with dementia, there are much broader issues. The use of all psychotropics has arguably been challenging and inconsistent. Although antipsychotic use in nursing homes has been reduced substantially, many controversies and concerns remain, such as the continuing significant use of other psychotropics. It is tempting to conclude that efforts to reduce the use of these medications might have been deliberately stymied, and that more drastic-if not coercive-measures are needed to correct these issues. However, many other compelling considerations must be defined accurately and addressed. Further improvement in the current situation requires reconsidering some current beliefs and approaches. A pause and reopening of meaningful discussion is needed. This 3-part series (in this and the next 2 issues of <i>The Senior Care Pharmacist</i>) will examine the history of the issues (this month), various perspectives on the issues (part 2), and lessons and recommended approaches for the future (part 3).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Senior Care Pharmacist\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"5-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Senior Care Pharmacist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2024.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Senior Care Pharmacist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2024.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

半个多世纪以来,关于使用精神药物("psychotropic medications",简称 "精神药物")来调节疗养院居民的行为、改善情绪和解决认知问题的策略,一直存在争议和冲突。目前的情况反映了长期以来的调查、报告、讨论、政府和专业活动以及其他尝试改进的情况。尽管人们的注意力主要集中在抗精神病药物的使用上,尤其是在控制痴呆症相关症状方面,但这其中还存在着更广泛的问题。可以说,所有精神药物的使用都具有挑战性且不一致。尽管疗养院中抗精神病药物的使用已大幅减少,但许多争议和担忧依然存在,例如其他精神药物的持续大量使用。我们很容易得出这样的结论:减少这些药物使用的努力可能是被蓄意阻挠的,因此需要采取更严厉的措施(如果不是强制措施的话)来纠正这些问题。然而,还必须准确界定和解决许多其他迫在眉睫的问题。要进一步改善目前的状况,就必须重新考虑当前的一些观念和方法。需要暂停并重新开展有意义的讨论。本系列由三部分组成(本期和下两期的《老年护理药剂师》),将探讨这些问题的历史(本月)、对这些问题的各种观点(第 2 部分)以及经验教训和对未来的建议方法(第 3 部分)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antipsychotics in Perspective: Past, Present, and Future.

For more than half a century, there has been controversy and conflict over using psychotropic medications ("psychotropics") as strategies to modulate behavior, enhance mood, and address cognitive issues for nursing home residents. The current situation reflects a long history of investigation, reports, discussions, government and professional activity, and other attempted improvement. Although attention has focused primarily on the use of antipsychotics, particularly to manage symptoms associated with dementia, there are much broader issues. The use of all psychotropics has arguably been challenging and inconsistent. Although antipsychotic use in nursing homes has been reduced substantially, many controversies and concerns remain, such as the continuing significant use of other psychotropics. It is tempting to conclude that efforts to reduce the use of these medications might have been deliberately stymied, and that more drastic-if not coercive-measures are needed to correct these issues. However, many other compelling considerations must be defined accurately and addressed. Further improvement in the current situation requires reconsidering some current beliefs and approaches. A pause and reopening of meaningful discussion is needed. This 3-part series (in this and the next 2 issues of The Senior Care Pharmacist) will examine the history of the issues (this month), various perspectives on the issues (part 2), and lessons and recommended approaches for the future (part 3).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Senior Care Pharmacist
Senior Care Pharmacist PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
期刊最新文献
Co-designing Medication Optimization Patient-Centered Outcomes Research With Older People and Caregivers as Research Partners. Heart Failure Part 3: Diuretic Management in Older People. How Should the Scope of Pharmacy Practice Be Decided? Marsha Meyer PRESIDENT 2024-2025. Notes on the Consultant Pharmacist Practice Model: At Home and Abroad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1