根据众包流量观测结果预测溪流持续时间

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Water Resources Research Pub Date : 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1029/2023wr035093
David A. Peterson, Stephanie K. Kampf, Kira C. Puntenney-Desmond, Matthew P. Fairchild, Sam Zipper, John C. Hammond, Matthew R. V. Ross, Megan G. Sears
{"title":"根据众包流量观测结果预测溪流持续时间","authors":"David A. Peterson, Stephanie K. Kampf, Kira C. Puntenney-Desmond, Matthew P. Fairchild, Sam Zipper, John C. Hammond, Matthew R. V. Ross, Megan G. Sears","doi":"10.1029/2023wr035093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Streamflow duration is important for aquatic ecosystems and assigning stream protection status. This study predicts streamflow duration, represented as the fraction of time with flow each year, using a combination of sensor data and crowd-sourced visual observations for a study area in northern Colorado, USA. We used 11 stream stage sensors and 177 visual monitoring points to examine how frequently streams should be sampled to compute flow fractions accurately. This showed that the number of visual observations needed to compute accurate flow fractions increases with decreasing flow duration. We then developed random forest models to predict mean annual flow fractions using climate, topographic, and land cover predictors and found that snow persistence, summer precipitation, and drainage area were important predictors. Model performance was best when using sites with ≥10 visual observations. Our model predicts that almost all (98%) of streams in the study region are non-perennial, about 10% more than the amount of non-perennial streams in the National Hydrography Dataset. Stream type maps are sensitive to the time period of data collection and to thresholds used to represent perennial versus non-perennial flow. To improve maps of non-perennial streams, we recommend moving beyond categorical classification of streams to a continuous variable like flow fraction. These efforts can be best supported with frequent observations in time that span streams with a wide range of flow fractions and drainage area attributes.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Streamflow Duration From Crowd-Sourced Flow Observations\",\"authors\":\"David A. Peterson, Stephanie K. Kampf, Kira C. Puntenney-Desmond, Matthew P. Fairchild, Sam Zipper, John C. Hammond, Matthew R. V. Ross, Megan G. Sears\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2023wr035093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Streamflow duration is important for aquatic ecosystems and assigning stream protection status. This study predicts streamflow duration, represented as the fraction of time with flow each year, using a combination of sensor data and crowd-sourced visual observations for a study area in northern Colorado, USA. We used 11 stream stage sensors and 177 visual monitoring points to examine how frequently streams should be sampled to compute flow fractions accurately. This showed that the number of visual observations needed to compute accurate flow fractions increases with decreasing flow duration. We then developed random forest models to predict mean annual flow fractions using climate, topographic, and land cover predictors and found that snow persistence, summer precipitation, and drainage area were important predictors. Model performance was best when using sites with ≥10 visual observations. Our model predicts that almost all (98%) of streams in the study region are non-perennial, about 10% more than the amount of non-perennial streams in the National Hydrography Dataset. Stream type maps are sensitive to the time period of data collection and to thresholds used to represent perennial versus non-perennial flow. To improve maps of non-perennial streams, we recommend moving beyond categorical classification of streams to a continuous variable like flow fraction. These efforts can be best supported with frequent observations in time that span streams with a wide range of flow fractions and drainage area attributes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Resources Research\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Resources Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr035093\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr035093","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

溪流持续时间对于水生生态系统和确定溪流保护状态非常重要。本研究在美国科罗拉多州北部的一个研究区域,结合传感器数据和群众提供的目测数据,预测溪流持续时间,即每年有水流的时间比例。我们使用了 11 个溪流水位传感器和 177 个目测监测点,研究了为准确计算流量分数而对溪流进行采样的频率。结果表明,准确计算流量分数所需的目视观测次数会随着流量持续时间的减少而增加。然后,我们建立了随机森林模型,利用气候、地形和土地覆盖预测因子来预测年平均流量分数,结果发现积雪持续时间、夏季降水量和流域面积是重要的预测因子。当使用目测观测点≥10 个时,模型性能最佳。根据我们的模型预测,研究区域内几乎所有(98%)的溪流都是非多年生溪流,比国家水文数据集中的非多年生溪流数量多出约 10%。溪流类型图对数据收集的时间段以及代表常年流与非常年流的阈值很敏感。为了改进非常年性溪流地图,我们建议从溪流的分类转为像流量分数这样的连续变量。这些工作的最佳支持是对具有多种流量分数和排水区属性的溪流进行频繁的时间观测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting Streamflow Duration From Crowd-Sourced Flow Observations
Streamflow duration is important for aquatic ecosystems and assigning stream protection status. This study predicts streamflow duration, represented as the fraction of time with flow each year, using a combination of sensor data and crowd-sourced visual observations for a study area in northern Colorado, USA. We used 11 stream stage sensors and 177 visual monitoring points to examine how frequently streams should be sampled to compute flow fractions accurately. This showed that the number of visual observations needed to compute accurate flow fractions increases with decreasing flow duration. We then developed random forest models to predict mean annual flow fractions using climate, topographic, and land cover predictors and found that snow persistence, summer precipitation, and drainage area were important predictors. Model performance was best when using sites with ≥10 visual observations. Our model predicts that almost all (98%) of streams in the study region are non-perennial, about 10% more than the amount of non-perennial streams in the National Hydrography Dataset. Stream type maps are sensitive to the time period of data collection and to thresholds used to represent perennial versus non-perennial flow. To improve maps of non-perennial streams, we recommend moving beyond categorical classification of streams to a continuous variable like flow fraction. These efforts can be best supported with frequent observations in time that span streams with a wide range of flow fractions and drainage area attributes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
期刊最新文献
Quantifying Streambed Grain Size, Uncertainty, and Hydrobiogeochemical Parameters Using Machine Learning Model YOLO iFLOW: A Framework and GUI to Quantify Effective Thermal Diffusivity and Advection in Permeable Materials From Temperature Time Series Assessing Potential Groundwater Storage Capacity for Sustainable Groundwater Management in the Transitioning Post-Subsidence Metropolitan Area Zeta Potential of Supercritical CO2-Water-Sandstone Systems and Its Correlation With Wettability and Residual Subsurface Trapping of CO2 Measuring River Surface Velocity Using UAS-Borne Doppler Radar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1