脊髓小脑性共济失调的小脑认知情感/施马曼综合征量表

Louisa P. Selvadurai, Susan L. Perlman, Tetsuo Ashizawa, George R. Wilmot, Chiadi U. Onyike, Liana S. Rosenthal, Vikram G. Shakkottai, Henry L. Paulson, Sub H. Subramony, Khalaf O. Bushara, Sheng-Han Kuo, Cameron Dietiker, Michael D. Geschwind, Alexandra B. Nelson, Christopher M. Gomez, Puneet Opal, Theresa A. Zesiewicz, Trevor Hawkins, Talene A. Yacoubian, Peggy C. Nopoulos, Sharon J. Sha, Peter E. Morrison, Karla P. Figueroa, Stefan M. Pulst, Jeremy D. Schmahmann
{"title":"脊髓小脑性共济失调的小脑认知情感/施马曼综合征量表","authors":"Louisa P. Selvadurai, Susan L. Perlman, Tetsuo Ashizawa, George R. Wilmot, Chiadi U. Onyike, Liana S. Rosenthal, Vikram G. Shakkottai, Henry L. Paulson, Sub H. Subramony, Khalaf O. Bushara, Sheng-Han Kuo, Cameron Dietiker, Michael D. Geschwind, Alexandra B. Nelson, Christopher M. Gomez, Puneet Opal, Theresa A. Zesiewicz, Trevor Hawkins, Talene A. Yacoubian, Peggy C. Nopoulos, Sharon J. Sha, Peter E. Morrison, Karla P. Figueroa, Stefan M. Pulst, Jeremy D. Schmahmann","doi":"10.1007/s12311-023-01651-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome (CCAS) manifests as impaired executive control, linguistic processing, visual spatial function, and affect regulation. The CCAS has been described in the spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), but its prevalence is unknown. We analyzed results of the CCAS/Schmahmann Scale (CCAS-S), developed to detect and quantify CCAS, in two natural history studies of 309 individuals Symptomatic for SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA7, or SCA8, 26 individuals Pre-symptomatic for SCA1 or SCA3, and 37 Controls. We compared total raw scores, domain scores, and total fail scores between Symptomatic, Pre-symptomatic, and Control cohorts, and between SCA types. We calculated scale sensitivity and selectivity based on CCAS category designation among Symptomatic individuals and Controls, and correlated CCAS-S performance against age and education, and in Symptomatic patients, against genetic repeat length, onset age, disease duration, motor ataxia, depression, and fatigue. Definite CCAS was identified in 46% of the Symptomatic group. False positive rate among Controls was 5.4%. Symptomatic individuals had poorer global CCAS-S performance than Controls, accounting for age and education. The domains of semantic fluency, phonemic fluency, and category switching that tap executive function and linguistic processing consistently separated Symptomatic individuals from Controls. CCAS-S scores correlated most closely with motor ataxia. Controls were similar to Pre-symptomatic individuals whose nearness to symptom onset was unknown. The use of the CCAS-S identifies a high CCAS prevalence in a large cohort of SCA patients, underscoring the utility of the scale and the notion that the CCAS is the third cornerstone of clinical ataxiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":22415,"journal":{"name":"The Cerebellum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome Scale in Spinocerebellar Ataxias\",\"authors\":\"Louisa P. Selvadurai, Susan L. Perlman, Tetsuo Ashizawa, George R. Wilmot, Chiadi U. Onyike, Liana S. Rosenthal, Vikram G. Shakkottai, Henry L. Paulson, Sub H. Subramony, Khalaf O. Bushara, Sheng-Han Kuo, Cameron Dietiker, Michael D. Geschwind, Alexandra B. Nelson, Christopher M. Gomez, Puneet Opal, Theresa A. Zesiewicz, Trevor Hawkins, Talene A. Yacoubian, Peggy C. Nopoulos, Sharon J. Sha, Peter E. Morrison, Karla P. Figueroa, Stefan M. Pulst, Jeremy D. Schmahmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12311-023-01651-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome (CCAS) manifests as impaired executive control, linguistic processing, visual spatial function, and affect regulation. The CCAS has been described in the spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), but its prevalence is unknown. We analyzed results of the CCAS/Schmahmann Scale (CCAS-S), developed to detect and quantify CCAS, in two natural history studies of 309 individuals Symptomatic for SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA7, or SCA8, 26 individuals Pre-symptomatic for SCA1 or SCA3, and 37 Controls. We compared total raw scores, domain scores, and total fail scores between Symptomatic, Pre-symptomatic, and Control cohorts, and between SCA types. We calculated scale sensitivity and selectivity based on CCAS category designation among Symptomatic individuals and Controls, and correlated CCAS-S performance against age and education, and in Symptomatic patients, against genetic repeat length, onset age, disease duration, motor ataxia, depression, and fatigue. Definite CCAS was identified in 46% of the Symptomatic group. False positive rate among Controls was 5.4%. Symptomatic individuals had poorer global CCAS-S performance than Controls, accounting for age and education. The domains of semantic fluency, phonemic fluency, and category switching that tap executive function and linguistic processing consistently separated Symptomatic individuals from Controls. CCAS-S scores correlated most closely with motor ataxia. Controls were similar to Pre-symptomatic individuals whose nearness to symptom onset was unknown. The use of the CCAS-S identifies a high CCAS prevalence in a large cohort of SCA patients, underscoring the utility of the scale and the notion that the CCAS is the third cornerstone of clinical ataxiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cerebellum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cerebellum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-023-01651-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cerebellum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-023-01651-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小脑认知情感/施马曼综合征(CCAS)表现为执行控制、语言处理、视觉空间功能和情感调节能力受损。脊髓小脑共济失调症(SCA)中也有关于 CCAS 的描述,但其发病率尚不清楚。我们在两项自然史研究中分析了用于检测和量化 CCAS 的 CCAS/Schmahmann量表(CCAS-S)的结果,研究对象包括 309 名 SCA1、SCA2、SCA3、SCA6、SCA7 或 SCA8 症状患者,26 名 SCA1 或 SCA3 症状前期患者,以及 37 名对照组患者。我们比较了症状组、症状前期组和对照组之间以及不同 SCA 类型之间的原始总分、领域分和不及格总分。我们根据症状患者和对照组的 CCAS 类别指定计算量表的灵敏度和选择性,并将 CCAS-S 的表现与年龄和教育程度相关联,在症状患者中与遗传重复长度、发病年龄、病程、运动性共济失调、抑郁和疲劳相关联。46%的症状组患者被确定为CCAS阳性。对照组的假阳性率为 5.4%。考虑到年龄和教育程度,症状组患者的CCAS-S总体表现比对照组差。在语义流畅性、语音流畅性和类别转换等反映执行功能和语言处理能力的领域中,症状组患者与对照组患者的差异一直很大。CCAS-S得分与运动性共济失调的相关性最为密切。对照组类似于症状前患者,他们的症状发病时间尚不清楚。CCAS-S的使用确定了CCAS在大量SCA患者中的高患病率,强调了该量表的实用性以及CCAS是临床共济失调学第三块基石的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome Scale in Spinocerebellar Ataxias

The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome (CCAS) manifests as impaired executive control, linguistic processing, visual spatial function, and affect regulation. The CCAS has been described in the spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), but its prevalence is unknown. We analyzed results of the CCAS/Schmahmann Scale (CCAS-S), developed to detect and quantify CCAS, in two natural history studies of 309 individuals Symptomatic for SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA7, or SCA8, 26 individuals Pre-symptomatic for SCA1 or SCA3, and 37 Controls. We compared total raw scores, domain scores, and total fail scores between Symptomatic, Pre-symptomatic, and Control cohorts, and between SCA types. We calculated scale sensitivity and selectivity based on CCAS category designation among Symptomatic individuals and Controls, and correlated CCAS-S performance against age and education, and in Symptomatic patients, against genetic repeat length, onset age, disease duration, motor ataxia, depression, and fatigue. Definite CCAS was identified in 46% of the Symptomatic group. False positive rate among Controls was 5.4%. Symptomatic individuals had poorer global CCAS-S performance than Controls, accounting for age and education. The domains of semantic fluency, phonemic fluency, and category switching that tap executive function and linguistic processing consistently separated Symptomatic individuals from Controls. CCAS-S scores correlated most closely with motor ataxia. Controls were similar to Pre-symptomatic individuals whose nearness to symptom onset was unknown. The use of the CCAS-S identifies a high CCAS prevalence in a large cohort of SCA patients, underscoring the utility of the scale and the notion that the CCAS is the third cornerstone of clinical ataxiology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CACNA1G Causes Dominantly Inherited Myoclonus-Ataxia with Intellectual Disability: A Case Report Investigating Cerebello-Frontal Circuits Associated with Emotional Prosody: A Double-Blind tDCS and fNIRS study Altered Function and Structure of the Cerebellum Associated with Gut–Brain Regulation in Crohn’s Disease: a Structural and Functional MRI Study Different Numbers of Conjunctive Stimuli Induce LTP or LTD in Mouse Cerebellar Purkinje Cell Oculomotor and Vestibular Deficits in Friedreich Ataxia - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quantitative Measurements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1