下载PDF
{"title":"从单室生理学患者心脏磁共振成像注册表中评估心室容积的深度学习管道。","authors":"Tina Yao, Nicole St Clair, Gabriel F Miller, Adam L Dorfman, Mark A Fogel, Sunil Ghelani, Rajesh Krishnamurthy, Christopher Z Lam, Michael Quail, Joshua D Robinson, David Schidlow, Timothy C Slesnick, Justin Weigand, Jennifer A Steeden, Rahul H Rathod, Vivek Muthurangu","doi":"10.1148/ryai.230132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To develop an end-to-end deep learning (DL) pipeline for automated ventricular segmentation of cardiac MRI data from a multicenter registry of patients with Fontan circulation (Fontan Outcomes Registry Using CMR Examinations [FORCE]). Materials and Methods This retrospective study used 250 cardiac MRI examinations (November 2007-December 2022) from 13 institutions for training, validation, and testing. The pipeline contained three DL models: a classifier to identify short-axis cine stacks and two U-Net 3+ models for image cropping and segmentation. The automated segmentations were evaluated on the test set (<i>n</i> = 50) by using the Dice score. Volumetric and functional metrics derived from DL and ground truth manual segmentations were compared using Bland-Altman and intraclass correlation analysis. The pipeline was further qualitatively evaluated on 475 unseen examinations. Results There were acceptable limits of agreement (LOA) and minimal biases between the ground truth and DL end-diastolic volume (EDV) (bias: -0.6 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, LOA: -20.6 to 19.5 mL/m<sup>2</sup>) and end-systolic volume (ESV) (bias: -1.1 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, LOA: -18.1 to 15.9 mL/m<sup>2</sup>), with high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs > 0.97) and Dice scores (EDV, 0.91 and ESV, 0.86). There was moderate agreement for ventricular mass (bias: -1.9 g/m<sup>2</sup>, LOA: -17.3 to 13.5 g/m<sup>2</sup>) and an ICC of 0.94. There was also acceptable agreement for stroke volume (bias: 0.6 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, LOA: -17.2 to 18.3 mL/m<sup>2</sup>) and ejection fraction (bias: 0.6%, LOA: -12.2% to 13.4%), with high ICCs (>0.81). The pipeline achieved satisfactory segmentation in 68% of the 475 unseen examinations, while 26% needed minor adjustments, 5% needed major adjustments, and in 0.4%, the cropping model failed. Conclusion The DL pipeline can provide fast standardized segmentation for patients with single ventricle physiology across multiple centers. This pipeline can be applied to all cardiac MRI examinations in the FORCE registry. <b>Keywords:</b> Cardiac, Adults and Pediatrics, MR Imaging, Congenital, Volume Analysis, Segmentation, Quantification <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":"6 1","pages":"e230132"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10831511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Deep Learning Pipeline for Assessing Ventricular Volumes from a Cardiac MRI Registry of Patients with Single Ventricle Physiology.\",\"authors\":\"Tina Yao, Nicole St Clair, Gabriel F Miller, Adam L Dorfman, Mark A Fogel, Sunil Ghelani, Rajesh Krishnamurthy, Christopher Z Lam, Michael Quail, Joshua D Robinson, David Schidlow, Timothy C Slesnick, Justin Weigand, Jennifer A Steeden, Rahul H Rathod, Vivek Muthurangu\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/ryai.230132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose To develop an end-to-end deep learning (DL) pipeline for automated ventricular segmentation of cardiac MRI data from a multicenter registry of patients with Fontan circulation (Fontan Outcomes Registry Using CMR Examinations [FORCE]). Materials and Methods This retrospective study used 250 cardiac MRI examinations (November 2007-December 2022) from 13 institutions for training, validation, and testing. The pipeline contained three DL models: a classifier to identify short-axis cine stacks and two U-Net 3+ models for image cropping and segmentation. The automated segmentations were evaluated on the test set (<i>n</i> = 50) by using the Dice score. Volumetric and functional metrics derived from DL and ground truth manual segmentations were compared using Bland-Altman and intraclass correlation analysis. The pipeline was further qualitatively evaluated on 475 unseen examinations. Results There were acceptable limits of agreement (LOA) and minimal biases between the ground truth and DL end-diastolic volume (EDV) (bias: -0.6 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, LOA: -20.6 to 19.5 mL/m<sup>2</sup>) and end-systolic volume (ESV) (bias: -1.1 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, LOA: -18.1 to 15.9 mL/m<sup>2</sup>), with high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs > 0.97) and Dice scores (EDV, 0.91 and ESV, 0.86). There was moderate agreement for ventricular mass (bias: -1.9 g/m<sup>2</sup>, LOA: -17.3 to 13.5 g/m<sup>2</sup>) and an ICC of 0.94. There was also acceptable agreement for stroke volume (bias: 0.6 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, LOA: -17.2 to 18.3 mL/m<sup>2</sup>) and ejection fraction (bias: 0.6%, LOA: -12.2% to 13.4%), with high ICCs (>0.81). The pipeline achieved satisfactory segmentation in 68% of the 475 unseen examinations, while 26% needed minor adjustments, 5% needed major adjustments, and in 0.4%, the cropping model failed. Conclusion The DL pipeline can provide fast standardized segmentation for patients with single ventricle physiology across multiple centers. This pipeline can be applied to all cardiac MRI examinations in the FORCE registry. <b>Keywords:</b> Cardiac, Adults and Pediatrics, MR Imaging, Congenital, Volume Analysis, Segmentation, Quantification <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"e230132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10831511/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用