哪些瞄准运动模型适合不同深度的远端指向?

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1177/00187208231222329
Yuqian Wang, Ravindra S Goonetilleke, Ray F Lin
{"title":"哪些瞄准运动模型适合不同深度的远端指向?","authors":"Yuqian Wang, Ravindra S Goonetilleke, Ray F Lin","doi":"10.1177/00187208231222329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>With the rapid improvements in drone technology, there is an increasing interest in distal pointing to diffuse drones. This study investigated the effect of depth on distal pointing when the hand does not traverse the entire distance from start to target so that the most suitable mathematical model can be assessed.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Starting from the Fitts paradigm, researchers have proposed different models to predict movement time when the distance to the target is variable. They do consider distance, but they are based on statistical modeling rather than the underlying control mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four participants volunteered for an experiment in a full-factorial Fitts' paradigm task (3 levels of movement amplitude *7 levels of target width *3 levels of distance from participant to screen). Movement time and the number of errors were the dependent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Depth has a significant effect when the target width is small, but depth has no effect when the target width is large. The angular version of the two-part model is superior to the one-part Fitts' model at larger distances. Besides, Index of difficulty for distal pointing, <math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow><mtext>DP</mtext></msub></mrow></math> with adjustable <i>k</i> achieves the best fit even though the model is very sensitive to the value of <i>k</i> and the complexity of the model could be resulting in an overfitting. The result implies that the effects of movement amplitude and target width are not comparable and grouping them to form a dependent index of difficulty can be misleading especially when distance is an added variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The angular version of the two-part model is a viable and meaningful description for distal pointing. Even though the <math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow><mtext>DP</mtext></msub></mrow></math> with adjustable <i>k</i> is the best predictor for movement time when depth is an added variable, there is no physical interpretation for it.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>A reasonable predictive model for performance assessments and predictions in distal pointing.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"2636-2650"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Aimed Movement Models Fit Distal Pointing With Varying Depth?\",\"authors\":\"Yuqian Wang, Ravindra S Goonetilleke, Ray F Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00187208231222329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>With the rapid improvements in drone technology, there is an increasing interest in distal pointing to diffuse drones. This study investigated the effect of depth on distal pointing when the hand does not traverse the entire distance from start to target so that the most suitable mathematical model can be assessed.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Starting from the Fitts paradigm, researchers have proposed different models to predict movement time when the distance to the target is variable. They do consider distance, but they are based on statistical modeling rather than the underlying control mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four participants volunteered for an experiment in a full-factorial Fitts' paradigm task (3 levels of movement amplitude *7 levels of target width *3 levels of distance from participant to screen). Movement time and the number of errors were the dependent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Depth has a significant effect when the target width is small, but depth has no effect when the target width is large. The angular version of the two-part model is superior to the one-part Fitts' model at larger distances. Besides, Index of difficulty for distal pointing, <math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow><mtext>DP</mtext></msub></mrow></math> with adjustable <i>k</i> achieves the best fit even though the model is very sensitive to the value of <i>k</i> and the complexity of the model could be resulting in an overfitting. The result implies that the effects of movement amplitude and target width are not comparable and grouping them to form a dependent index of difficulty can be misleading especially when distance is an added variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The angular version of the two-part model is a viable and meaningful description for distal pointing. Even though the <math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>I</mi><mi>D</mi></mrow><mtext>DP</mtext></msub></mrow></math> with adjustable <i>k</i> is the best predictor for movement time when depth is an added variable, there is no physical interpretation for it.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>A reasonable predictive model for performance assessments and predictions in distal pointing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Factors\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2636-2650\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231222329\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231222329","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:随着无人机技术的飞速发展,人们对无人机的远端指向漫射越来越感兴趣。本研究调查了当手没有走完从起点到目标的整个距离时,深度对远端指向的影响,以便评估最合适的数学模型:背景:从菲茨范式出发,研究人员提出了不同的模型,用于预测与目标距离可变时的移动时间。这些模型确实考虑了距离,但它们都是基于统计建模,而不是基于潜在的控制机制:24名参与者自愿参加了全因子菲茨范式任务实验(3级运动幅度*7级目标宽度*3级参与者到屏幕的距离)。运动时间和错误次数是因变量:结果:当目标宽度较小时,深度有明显影响,但当目标宽度较大时,深度没有影响。在较大距离上,两部分模型的角度版本优于单部分菲茨模型。此外,尽管模型对 k 值非常敏感,而且模型的复杂性可能会导致过度拟合,但在远端指向难度指数方面,可调节 k 值的 IDDP 实现了最佳拟合。这一结果表明,运动幅度和目标宽度的影响并不具有可比性,将它们组合在一起形成一个因变量难度指数可能会产生误导,特别是当距离是一个附加变量时:结论:两部分模型的角度版本是对远端指向的一种可行且有意义的描述。尽管当深度是一个附加变量时,可调节 k 的 IDDP 是运动时间的最佳预测指标,但它并没有物理解释:应用:一个合理的预测模型,用于远端指向的性能评估和预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Aimed Movement Models Fit Distal Pointing With Varying Depth?

Objective: With the rapid improvements in drone technology, there is an increasing interest in distal pointing to diffuse drones. This study investigated the effect of depth on distal pointing when the hand does not traverse the entire distance from start to target so that the most suitable mathematical model can be assessed.

Background: Starting from the Fitts paradigm, researchers have proposed different models to predict movement time when the distance to the target is variable. They do consider distance, but they are based on statistical modeling rather than the underlying control mechanisms.

Methods: Twenty-four participants volunteered for an experiment in a full-factorial Fitts' paradigm task (3 levels of movement amplitude *7 levels of target width *3 levels of distance from participant to screen). Movement time and the number of errors were the dependent variables.

Results: Depth has a significant effect when the target width is small, but depth has no effect when the target width is large. The angular version of the two-part model is superior to the one-part Fitts' model at larger distances. Besides, Index of difficulty for distal pointing, IDDP with adjustable k achieves the best fit even though the model is very sensitive to the value of k and the complexity of the model could be resulting in an overfitting. The result implies that the effects of movement amplitude and target width are not comparable and grouping them to form a dependent index of difficulty can be misleading especially when distance is an added variable.

Conclusion: The angular version of the two-part model is a viable and meaningful description for distal pointing. Even though the IDDP with adjustable k is the best predictor for movement time when depth is an added variable, there is no physical interpretation for it.

Application: A reasonable predictive model for performance assessments and predictions in distal pointing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Attentional Tunneling in Pilots During a Visual Tracking Task With a Head Mounted Display. Examining Patterns and Predictors of ADHD Teens' Skill-Learning Trajectories During Enhanced FOrward Concentration and Attention Learning (FOCAL+) Training. Is Less Sometimes More? An Experimental Comparison of Four Measures of Perceived Usability. An Automobile's Tail Lights: Sacrificing Safety for Playful Design? Virtual Reality Adaptive Training for Personalized Stress Inoculation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1