纸胶带可改善疤痕美观,防止伤口闭合并发症。

Catherine Stratis, Syed Ali Haider, Olachi Oleru, Nargiz Seyidova, Hani Sbitany, Peter W Henderson
{"title":"纸胶带可改善疤痕美观,防止伤口闭合并发症。","authors":"Catherine Stratis, Syed Ali Haider, Olachi Oleru, Nargiz Seyidova, Hani Sbitany, Peter W Henderson","doi":"10.1097/PSN.0000000000000537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is uncertainty whether postoperative application of paper tape (PT) improves scar aesthetics and reduces wound closure complications. This study aimed to review and assess the quality of applicable findings from studies investigating PT's efficacy. We queried PubMed and SCOPUS using the search terms \"((\"paper tape\") AND (wound OR closure OR heal* OR complication OR skin OR prevent* OR scar*)).\" We excluded articles that were duplicates, basic science, or not clinically relevant. We assessed the level of evidence for each article using the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) Rating Levels of Evidence and Grading Recommendations for Therapeutic Studies, ranging from I (highest) to V (lowest). Of 186 publications reviewed, we included eight studies in the literature review. Five of these studies reported statistically significant positive outcomes on scar aesthetics and wound closure associated with using PT. Using the ASPS rating system, we found that two studies were Level I, three studies were Level II, two studies were Level IV, and one study was Level V. Notably, heterogeneity in the study designs limited outcome comparison. The data from the studies included in this literature review support using PT to optimize scar and wound management. The lack of higher levels of evidence, however, suggests the need for additional randomized controlled trials to rigorously evaluate patient outcomes when using PT compared with other forms of adhesive dressings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74460,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and aesthetic nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10964990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paper Tape May Improve Scar Aesthetics and Prevent Wound Closure Complications.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Stratis, Syed Ali Haider, Olachi Oleru, Nargiz Seyidova, Hani Sbitany, Peter W Henderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PSN.0000000000000537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is uncertainty whether postoperative application of paper tape (PT) improves scar aesthetics and reduces wound closure complications. This study aimed to review and assess the quality of applicable findings from studies investigating PT's efficacy. We queried PubMed and SCOPUS using the search terms \\\"((\\\"paper tape\\\") AND (wound OR closure OR heal* OR complication OR skin OR prevent* OR scar*)).\\\" We excluded articles that were duplicates, basic science, or not clinically relevant. We assessed the level of evidence for each article using the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) Rating Levels of Evidence and Grading Recommendations for Therapeutic Studies, ranging from I (highest) to V (lowest). Of 186 publications reviewed, we included eight studies in the literature review. Five of these studies reported statistically significant positive outcomes on scar aesthetics and wound closure associated with using PT. Using the ASPS rating system, we found that two studies were Level I, three studies were Level II, two studies were Level IV, and one study was Level V. Notably, heterogeneity in the study designs limited outcome comparison. The data from the studies included in this literature review support using PT to optimize scar and wound management. The lack of higher levels of evidence, however, suggests the need for additional randomized controlled trials to rigorously evaluate patient outcomes when using PT compared with other forms of adhesive dressings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and aesthetic nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10964990/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and aesthetic nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PSN.0000000000000537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and aesthetic nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PSN.0000000000000537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

术后应用纸胶带(PT)是否能改善疤痕美观并减少伤口闭合并发症,目前尚不确定。本研究旨在回顾和评估有关 PT 疗效的研究结果的质量。我们使用检索词"(("纸胶带")和(伤口或闭合或愈合*或并发症或皮肤或预防*或疤痕*))"查询了 PubMed 和 SCOPUS。我们排除了重复、基础科学或与临床无关的文章。我们采用美国整形外科医师学会 (ASPS) 的治疗研究证据等级和分级建议对每篇文章的证据等级进行了评估,从 I 级(最高)到 V 级(最低)不等。在查阅的 186 篇出版物中,我们将 8 项研究纳入了文献综述。其中五项研究报告了使用 PT 对疤痕美学和伤口闭合产生的具有统计学意义的积极效果。使用 ASPS 评级系统,我们发现两项研究为 I 级,三项研究为 II 级,两项研究为 IV 级,一项研究为 V 级。本文献综述中的研究数据支持使用 PT 来优化疤痕和伤口管理。但是,由于缺乏更高级别的证据,因此需要进行更多的随机对照试验,以严格评估使用 PT 与其他形式的粘合敷料相比对患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Paper Tape May Improve Scar Aesthetics and Prevent Wound Closure Complications.

There is uncertainty whether postoperative application of paper tape (PT) improves scar aesthetics and reduces wound closure complications. This study aimed to review and assess the quality of applicable findings from studies investigating PT's efficacy. We queried PubMed and SCOPUS using the search terms "(("paper tape") AND (wound OR closure OR heal* OR complication OR skin OR prevent* OR scar*))." We excluded articles that were duplicates, basic science, or not clinically relevant. We assessed the level of evidence for each article using the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) Rating Levels of Evidence and Grading Recommendations for Therapeutic Studies, ranging from I (highest) to V (lowest). Of 186 publications reviewed, we included eight studies in the literature review. Five of these studies reported statistically significant positive outcomes on scar aesthetics and wound closure associated with using PT. Using the ASPS rating system, we found that two studies were Level I, three studies were Level II, two studies were Level IV, and one study was Level V. Notably, heterogeneity in the study designs limited outcome comparison. The data from the studies included in this literature review support using PT to optimize scar and wound management. The lack of higher levels of evidence, however, suggests the need for additional randomized controlled trials to rigorously evaluate patient outcomes when using PT compared with other forms of adhesive dressings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
11 Insightful Data Points to Monitor for Your Medical Aesthetics Practice. 2024 Plastic and Aesthetic Nursing Journal Award Winners! A Personalized Protocol for Facial Rejuvenation Using Two Soft Hyaluronic Acid Fillers With High Cohesivity. Consensus Recommendations for Treatment of the Upper Face With LetibotulinumtoxinA. Managing Vital and Nonvital Tooth Bleaching Among Endodontists and General Dental Practitioners: A Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1