评估免洗牙科产品中的全氟辛烷磺酸对人类健康和生态环境的潜在影响。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Toxicology and Industrial Health Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-03 DOI:10.1177/07482337231224990
Andrey Massarsky, Jillian A Parker, Lauren Gloekler, Melinda T Donnell, Natalie R Binczewski, Jordan S Kozal, Taryn McKnight, Andrew Patterson, Marisa L Kreider
{"title":"评估免洗牙科产品中的全氟辛烷磺酸对人类健康和生态环境的潜在影响。","authors":"Andrey Massarsky, Jillian A Parker, Lauren Gloekler, Melinda T Donnell, Natalie R Binczewski, Jordan S Kozal, Taryn McKnight, Andrew Patterson, Marisa L Kreider","doi":"10.1177/07482337231224990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contaminated water and food are the main sources of documented per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure in humans. However, other sources may contribute to the overall PFAS intake. While several studies documented the presence of PFAS in consumer products, PFAS evaluation in dental products has been limited to floss and tape to date. This study estimated PFAS exposures from a convenience sample of leave-in dental products (night guards and whitening trays), which remain in contact with the mouth for longer durations than previously evaluated dental products. This analysis evaluated whether consumer usage of these dental products meaningfully contributes to oral exposure of PFAS. Leaching of PFAS upon disposal of products was also considered. Out of 24 PFAS measured, perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA; 3.24-4.17 ng/product or 0.67-0.83 ng/g) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS; 7.25-16.45 ng/product or 1.2-2.3 ng/g) were detected in night guards, and no PFAS were detected in whitening trays. Non-targeted analysis showed additional possible PFAS, which could not be characterized. The findings showed that PFOS and/or PFBA present in night guards were unlikely to pose a health concern. From an ecological perspective, the dental products examined were shown to constitute a negligible contribution to environmental PFAS. In conclusion, the examined dental products do not represent a significant source of exposure to PFAS for humans or the environment. The study demonstrates how risk assessment can be integrated by the industry into product stewardship programs to evaluate the potential health and environmental impacts of chemicals in consumer products.</p>","PeriodicalId":23171,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology and Industrial Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing potential human health and ecological implications of PFAS from leave-in dental products.\",\"authors\":\"Andrey Massarsky, Jillian A Parker, Lauren Gloekler, Melinda T Donnell, Natalie R Binczewski, Jordan S Kozal, Taryn McKnight, Andrew Patterson, Marisa L Kreider\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07482337231224990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Contaminated water and food are the main sources of documented per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure in humans. However, other sources may contribute to the overall PFAS intake. While several studies documented the presence of PFAS in consumer products, PFAS evaluation in dental products has been limited to floss and tape to date. This study estimated PFAS exposures from a convenience sample of leave-in dental products (night guards and whitening trays), which remain in contact with the mouth for longer durations than previously evaluated dental products. This analysis evaluated whether consumer usage of these dental products meaningfully contributes to oral exposure of PFAS. Leaching of PFAS upon disposal of products was also considered. Out of 24 PFAS measured, perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA; 3.24-4.17 ng/product or 0.67-0.83 ng/g) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS; 7.25-16.45 ng/product or 1.2-2.3 ng/g) were detected in night guards, and no PFAS were detected in whitening trays. Non-targeted analysis showed additional possible PFAS, which could not be characterized. The findings showed that PFOS and/or PFBA present in night guards were unlikely to pose a health concern. From an ecological perspective, the dental products examined were shown to constitute a negligible contribution to environmental PFAS. In conclusion, the examined dental products do not represent a significant source of exposure to PFAS for humans or the environment. The study demonstrates how risk assessment can be integrated by the industry into product stewardship programs to evaluate the potential health and environmental impacts of chemicals in consumer products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicology and Industrial Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicology and Industrial Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07482337231224990\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology and Industrial Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07482337231224990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

受污染的水和食物是人类接触全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的主要来源。不过,其他来源也可能造成 PFAS 的总体摄入量。虽然有几项研究记录了消费品中存在的 PFAS,但迄今为止对牙科产品中 PFAS 的评估仅限于牙线和胶带。本研究估算了方便取样的免洗牙科产品(夜用护齿器和美白托盘)中的 PFAS 暴露量,这些产品与口腔接触的时间比之前评估的牙科产品更长。这项分析评估了消费者使用这些牙科产品是否会导致口腔接触 PFAS。此外,还考虑了产品废弃时 PFAS 的沥滤问题。在检测到的 24 种 PFAS 中,全氟丁酸(PFBA;3.24-4.17 纳克/产品或 0.67-0.83 纳克/克)和全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS;7.25-16.45 纳克/产品或 1.2-2.3 纳克/克)在夜用护齿器中被检测到,而在美白托盘中没有检测到 PFAS。非靶向分析显示还可能存在其他全氟辛烷磺酸,但无法确定其特征。研究结果表明,护牙器中的全氟辛烷磺酸和/或全氟辛基磺酸不太可能对健康造成影响。从生态学角度来看,所检查的牙科产品对环境中全氟辛烷磺酸的影响微乎其微。总之,所检查的牙科产品并不是人类或环境接触全氟辛烷磺酸的重要来源。该研究展示了行业如何将风险评估纳入产品监管计划,以评估消费品中的化学物质对健康和环境的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing potential human health and ecological implications of PFAS from leave-in dental products.

Contaminated water and food are the main sources of documented per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure in humans. However, other sources may contribute to the overall PFAS intake. While several studies documented the presence of PFAS in consumer products, PFAS evaluation in dental products has been limited to floss and tape to date. This study estimated PFAS exposures from a convenience sample of leave-in dental products (night guards and whitening trays), which remain in contact with the mouth for longer durations than previously evaluated dental products. This analysis evaluated whether consumer usage of these dental products meaningfully contributes to oral exposure of PFAS. Leaching of PFAS upon disposal of products was also considered. Out of 24 PFAS measured, perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA; 3.24-4.17 ng/product or 0.67-0.83 ng/g) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS; 7.25-16.45 ng/product or 1.2-2.3 ng/g) were detected in night guards, and no PFAS were detected in whitening trays. Non-targeted analysis showed additional possible PFAS, which could not be characterized. The findings showed that PFOS and/or PFBA present in night guards were unlikely to pose a health concern. From an ecological perspective, the dental products examined were shown to constitute a negligible contribution to environmental PFAS. In conclusion, the examined dental products do not represent a significant source of exposure to PFAS for humans or the environment. The study demonstrates how risk assessment can be integrated by the industry into product stewardship programs to evaluate the potential health and environmental impacts of chemicals in consumer products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Toxicology & Industrial Health is a journal dedicated to reporting results of basic and applied toxicological research with direct application to industrial/occupational health. Such research includes the fields of genetic and cellular toxicology and risk assessment associated with hazardous wastes and groundwater.
期刊最新文献
Occupational exposure to arsenic and leukopenia risk: Toxicological alert. Perfluorooctane sulfonate causes damage to L-02 cells via Wnt/β-catenin signal path and endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway. The impact of genetic polymorphism for detecting genotoxicity in workers occupationally exposed to formaldehyde: A systematic review. Impact of xylene exposure during organogenesis on foeto-placental efficiency and foetal viability: Exploring its association with oxidative stress-induced inflammation and apoptosis in utero. Environmental exposure to lead and cadmium only minimally affects the redox system of the follicular fluid and the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1