在 COVID-19 大流行期间,糖尿病患者使用远程保健进行糖尿病管理的经验:定性系统审查协议。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-23-00286
Alexander Gerrie, Susan Bellman, Danielle Pollock
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间,糖尿病患者使用远程保健进行糖尿病管理的经验:定性系统审查协议。","authors":"Alexander Gerrie, Susan Bellman, Danielle Pollock","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to explore the experiences of people with diabetes who used telehealth for diabetes management due to COVID-19 pandemic protocols rather than traditional in-person consultations.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>COVID-19 intensified globally from January 2020, eliciting a multinational response to infection control for health preservation, including social distancing in public areas and health care settings. The outcome had a significant impact on the health care system, where people with chronic diseases, such as those with diabetes, were required to transition most of their care to telehealth to align with social restrictions.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include qualitative and mixed methods studies and theses of any research design and in any language that examine the experiences of adults with diabetes who transitioned from in-person consultations to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exclusions will include pre-COVID-19 data; quantitative studies; and secondary, tertiary, and all other gray literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Emcare (Ovid), Embase, PubMed (NCBI), and several ProQuest databases will be conducted. Studies from January 2020 onwards in any language will be assessed for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will retrieve and screen titles and abstracts and full-text studies, and assess the methodological quality of the included studies utilizing the JBI qualitative critical appraisal tool. The included studies will be synthesized utilizing JBI meta-aggregation, and the certainty of the findings will be assessed with ConQual.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023424667.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1329-1335"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences of people with diabetes mellitus of telehealth for diabetes management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative systematic review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Gerrie, Susan Bellman, Danielle Pollock\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-23-00286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to explore the experiences of people with diabetes who used telehealth for diabetes management due to COVID-19 pandemic protocols rather than traditional in-person consultations.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>COVID-19 intensified globally from January 2020, eliciting a multinational response to infection control for health preservation, including social distancing in public areas and health care settings. The outcome had a significant impact on the health care system, where people with chronic diseases, such as those with diabetes, were required to transition most of their care to telehealth to align with social restrictions.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include qualitative and mixed methods studies and theses of any research design and in any language that examine the experiences of adults with diabetes who transitioned from in-person consultations to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exclusions will include pre-COVID-19 data; quantitative studies; and secondary, tertiary, and all other gray literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Emcare (Ovid), Embase, PubMed (NCBI), and several ProQuest databases will be conducted. Studies from January 2020 onwards in any language will be assessed for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will retrieve and screen titles and abstracts and full-text studies, and assess the methodological quality of the included studies utilizing the JBI qualitative critical appraisal tool. The included studies will be synthesized utilizing JBI meta-aggregation, and the certainty of the findings will be assessed with ConQual.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023424667.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1329-1335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本综述旨在探讨糖尿病患者因 COVID-19 大流行协议而利用远程医疗进行糖尿病管理,而非传统的面对面咨询的经历:从 2020 年 1 月起,COVID-19 在全球范围内愈演愈烈,引起了多国为保护健康而采取的感染控制措施,包括在公共场所和医疗机构中拉开社会距离。这一结果对医疗保健系统产生了重大影响,慢性病患者(如糖尿病患者)需要将大部分医疗服务转为远程医疗,以适应社会限制:本综述将包括定性和混合方法研究,以及以任何研究设计和任何语言撰写的论文,这些论文将研究在 COVID-19 大流行期间从面对面咨询过渡到远程医疗的成年糖尿病患者的经历。不包括 COVID-19 之前的数据、定量研究、二级、三级和所有其他灰色文献:将对 CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Scopus、Emcare (Ovid)、Embase (Elsevier)、PubMed (NCBI) 和几个 ProQuest 数据库进行检索。将对 2020 年 1 月以后的任何语言的研究进行评估,以便纳入。两名独立审稿人将检索和筛选标题、摘要和全文研究,并使用 JBI 定性批判性评估工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。将利用 JBI 元聚合对纳入的研究进行综合,并利用 ConQual.Review 注册对研究结果的确定性进行评估:综述注册:PREMCORD42023424667。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experiences of people with diabetes mellitus of telehealth for diabetes management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

Objective: The objective of this review is to explore the experiences of people with diabetes who used telehealth for diabetes management due to COVID-19 pandemic protocols rather than traditional in-person consultations.

Introduction: COVID-19 intensified globally from January 2020, eliciting a multinational response to infection control for health preservation, including social distancing in public areas and health care settings. The outcome had a significant impact on the health care system, where people with chronic diseases, such as those with diabetes, were required to transition most of their care to telehealth to align with social restrictions.

Inclusion criteria: This review will include qualitative and mixed methods studies and theses of any research design and in any language that examine the experiences of adults with diabetes who transitioned from in-person consultations to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exclusions will include pre-COVID-19 data; quantitative studies; and secondary, tertiary, and all other gray literature.

Methods: A search of CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Emcare (Ovid), Embase, PubMed (NCBI), and several ProQuest databases will be conducted. Studies from January 2020 onwards in any language will be assessed for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will retrieve and screen titles and abstracts and full-text studies, and assess the methodological quality of the included studies utilizing the JBI qualitative critical appraisal tool. The included studies will be synthesized utilizing JBI meta-aggregation, and the certainty of the findings will be assessed with ConQual.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023424667.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
期刊最新文献
Value-based outcome evaluation methods used by occupational therapists in primary care: a scoping review. Parents' and guardians' experiences of barriers and facilitators in accessing autism spectrum disorder diagnostic services for their children: a qualitative systematic review. Evidence on the accreditation of health professionals' education in the WHO Africa region: a scoping review protocol. Barriers and facilitators to designing, maintaining, and utilizing rare disease patient registries: a scoping review protocol. Supporting professional practice transition in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1