Hongzhi Su, Yulan Zhang, Guohui Wu, Zhenhua Chen, Nan Jiang, Weiwen Qiu, Lijun Chen
{"title":"不同玉米残茬管理对中国东北不同土层土壤有机氮循环的影响","authors":"Hongzhi Su, Yulan Zhang, Guohui Wu, Zhenhua Chen, Nan Jiang, Weiwen Qiu, Lijun Chen","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.13123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A field experiment was conducted in northeast China to examine the response of nitrogen cycling enzymes, that is, protease, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), amidase, urease, and peptidase, as well soil organic nitrogen (SON) fractions and their relationships to RT (no maize residue application), NT (no tillage with maize residues placed on the surface), TT (plow maize residues into the soil at 0–35 cm depth in the first year, 0–20 cm in the second year, and 0–15 cm in the third year), and PT (plow maize residues into soil at 0–35 cm depth). The results have shown that NT significantly enhanced the activities of protease and NAG at 0–10 cm soil depth in comparison with other treatments. NT and TT significantly enhanced the activities of protease compared to RT and PT at 10–20 cm soil depth. TT significantly enhanced the activities of NAG in comparison with RT at 10–20 cm soil depth. TT and PT significantly enhanced the activities of NAG and peptidase compared to RT and NT at 20–35 cm soil depth. PT significantly increased the activities of protease in comparison with RT at 20–35 cm soil depth. NT, TT, and PT significantly enhanced the activities of peptidase compared to RT at 10–20 cm soil depth. NT significantly increased the concentration of hydrolyzable <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msubsup>\n <mi>NH</mi>\n <mn>4</mn>\n <mo>+</mo>\n </msubsup>\n <mo>-</mo>\n <mi>N</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{NH}}_4^{+}\\hbox{-} \\mathrm{N} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> in comparison with other treatments at 0–10 cm soil depth. PT significantly enhanced the concentration of hydrolyzable <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msubsup>\n <mi>NH</mi>\n <mn>4</mn>\n <mo>+</mo>\n </msubsup>\n <mo>-</mo>\n <mi>N</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\mathrm{NH}}_4^{+}\\hbox{-} \\mathrm{N} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and amino acid N compared to other treatments at 20–35 cm soil depth. Redundancy analysis showed that protease played a crucial role in the cycling of SON under RT and NT, whereas peptidase and NAG played a significant role in the cycling of SON under TT and PT, respectively. This study provided a comprehensive understanding of crop residue return methods for regulating soil N cycling.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13123","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different maize residue managements on soil organic nitrogen cycling in different soil layers in northeast China\",\"authors\":\"Hongzhi Su, Yulan Zhang, Guohui Wu, Zhenhua Chen, Nan Jiang, Weiwen Qiu, Lijun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.13123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A field experiment was conducted in northeast China to examine the response of nitrogen cycling enzymes, that is, protease, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), amidase, urease, and peptidase, as well soil organic nitrogen (SON) fractions and their relationships to RT (no maize residue application), NT (no tillage with maize residues placed on the surface), TT (plow maize residues into the soil at 0–35 cm depth in the first year, 0–20 cm in the second year, and 0–15 cm in the third year), and PT (plow maize residues into soil at 0–35 cm depth). The results have shown that NT significantly enhanced the activities of protease and NAG at 0–10 cm soil depth in comparison with other treatments. NT and TT significantly enhanced the activities of protease compared to RT and PT at 10–20 cm soil depth. TT significantly enhanced the activities of NAG in comparison with RT at 10–20 cm soil depth. TT and PT significantly enhanced the activities of NAG and peptidase compared to RT and NT at 20–35 cm soil depth. PT significantly increased the activities of protease in comparison with RT at 20–35 cm soil depth. NT, TT, and PT significantly enhanced the activities of peptidase compared to RT at 10–20 cm soil depth. NT significantly increased the concentration of hydrolyzable <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msubsup>\\n <mi>NH</mi>\\n <mn>4</mn>\\n <mo>+</mo>\\n </msubsup>\\n <mo>-</mo>\\n <mi>N</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {\\\\mathrm{NH}}_4^{+}\\\\hbox{-} \\\\mathrm{N} $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> in comparison with other treatments at 0–10 cm soil depth. PT significantly enhanced the concentration of hydrolyzable <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msubsup>\\n <mi>NH</mi>\\n <mn>4</mn>\\n <mo>+</mo>\\n </msubsup>\\n <mo>-</mo>\\n <mi>N</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {\\\\mathrm{NH}}_4^{+}\\\\hbox{-} \\\\mathrm{N} $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and amino acid N compared to other treatments at 20–35 cm soil depth. Redundancy analysis showed that protease played a crucial role in the cycling of SON under RT and NT, whereas peptidase and NAG played a significant role in the cycling of SON under TT and PT, respectively. This study provided a comprehensive understanding of crop residue return methods for regulating soil N cycling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13123\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13123\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在中国东北地区进行了一项田间试验,研究了氮循环酶,即蛋白酶、N-乙酰-β-D-氨基葡萄糖酶(NAG)、酰胺酶、脲酶和肽酶,以及土壤有机氮(SON)组分的反应及其与RT(不施用玉米秸秆)的关系、NT(不耕作,玉米秸秆置于地表)、TT(第一年将玉米秸秆耕入土壤 0-35 厘米深,第二年耕入土壤 0-20 厘米深,第三年耕入土壤 0-15 厘米深)和 PT(将玉米秸秆耕入土壤 0-35 厘米深)的关系。结果表明,与其他处理相比,NT 能显著提高 0-10 厘米土层中蛋白酶和 NAG 的活性。与 RT 和 PT 相比,NT 和 TT 能明显提高 10-20 厘米土壤深度的蛋白酶活性。与 RT 相比,在 10-20 厘米土层深度,TT 能明显提高 NAG 的活性。与 RT 和 NT 相比,在 20-35 厘米土层深度,TT 和 PT 能明显提高 NAG 和肽酶的活性。在 20-35 厘米土层深度,与 RT 相比,PT 能明显提高蛋白酶的活性。与 RT 相比,在 10-20 厘米土层深度,NT、TT 和 PT 能明显提高肽酶的活性。NT 能明显提高可水解 NH4+-N$$ {\mathrm{NH}}_4^{+}\hbox{-} 的浓度。与 0-10 厘米土层深度的其他处理相比,NT 能明显提高可水解 NH4+-N$$ {\mathrm{NH}}_4^{+}\hbox{-} 的浓度。PT 能明显提高可水解 NH4+-N$$ {\mathrm{NH}}_4^{+}\hbox{-} 的浓度。与 20-35 厘米土层深度的其他处理相比,PT 能明显提高可水解 NH4+-N$$ {\mathrm{NH}}_4^{+}\hbox{-} 和氨基酸 N 的浓度。冗余分析表明,蛋白酶在 RT 和 NT 条件下对 SON 的循环起关键作用,而肽酶和 NAG 分别在 TT 和 PT 条件下对 SON 的循环起重要作用。这项研究使人们对作物秸秆还田调节土壤氮循环的方法有了全面的了解。
Effects of different maize residue managements on soil organic nitrogen cycling in different soil layers in northeast China
A field experiment was conducted in northeast China to examine the response of nitrogen cycling enzymes, that is, protease, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), amidase, urease, and peptidase, as well soil organic nitrogen (SON) fractions and their relationships to RT (no maize residue application), NT (no tillage with maize residues placed on the surface), TT (plow maize residues into the soil at 0–35 cm depth in the first year, 0–20 cm in the second year, and 0–15 cm in the third year), and PT (plow maize residues into soil at 0–35 cm depth). The results have shown that NT significantly enhanced the activities of protease and NAG at 0–10 cm soil depth in comparison with other treatments. NT and TT significantly enhanced the activities of protease compared to RT and PT at 10–20 cm soil depth. TT significantly enhanced the activities of NAG in comparison with RT at 10–20 cm soil depth. TT and PT significantly enhanced the activities of NAG and peptidase compared to RT and NT at 20–35 cm soil depth. PT significantly increased the activities of protease in comparison with RT at 20–35 cm soil depth. NT, TT, and PT significantly enhanced the activities of peptidase compared to RT at 10–20 cm soil depth. NT significantly increased the concentration of hydrolyzable in comparison with other treatments at 0–10 cm soil depth. PT significantly enhanced the concentration of hydrolyzable and amino acid N compared to other treatments at 20–35 cm soil depth. Redundancy analysis showed that protease played a crucial role in the cycling of SON under RT and NT, whereas peptidase and NAG played a significant role in the cycling of SON under TT and PT, respectively. This study provided a comprehensive understanding of crop residue return methods for regulating soil N cycling.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.